Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
The fact that you are pursuing this line of thought means you are more interested in finding the loopholes than in having the intent of the law followed.

Hey, we're kinda in agreement on something! I was thinking the same thing about folks screaming that a "25-day" review wasn't enough, didn't meet the law, or that the deal was never reviewed for security in the first place.

241 posted on 02/22/2006 10:15:52 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Coop
Hey, we're kinda in agreement on something! I was thinking the same thing about folks screaming that a "25-day" review wasn't enough, didn't meet the law, or that the deal was never reviewed for security in the first place.

Care to translate that as to whether you think the 45-day review is not a legal requirement?

247 posted on 02/22/2006 10:19:41 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson