Posted on 02/21/2006 9:22:01 PM PST by nickcarraway
Apparently I'm dead.
There can be no other explanation; I have always maintained that I would never live long enough to agree with Charles Schumer about anything. Still, it is ironic that my first posthumous column has to be in support of his position. He is in favor of chucking the recently announced dubious Dubai-U.S. deal to have that Arab emirate operate our major ports in New York and Miami. To be more precise, a quote-company-unquote quote-based-unquote in Dubai.
Okay, enough Schumer for one lifetime. Let me rather align myself with Republican Congressman Vito Fossella, who did hie to seize this matter of political piracy on the high seas, jumping on it early last week (although, in a dirty-pool bank-shot, Peter King's office stole the weekend New York newspaper coverage for their guy). Fossella is a favorite of mine, because I was there in 1996 when Guy Molinari, the cigar-chomping godfather of Staten Island politics, anointed Vito as the presumptive successor for daughter Nancy's Congressional seat.
We were at a rally for Republican foot-soldiers in a "club" on the Brooklyn side of the Verazzano Bridge. I was there flacking for a Republican Congressional candidate amid a gaggle of the mousy bespectacled reporters that New York seems to spawn in such profusion. As I circulated among the buzzing crowd, I heard two responses repeated everywhere. "He looks like a jock, but he was Fordham Law." "Doesn't his wife look exactly like Marisa Tomei?" Than which, in Big Apple parlance, no more vociferous approbation is imaginable.
Vito is concerned that the United Arab Emirates, which has a history of terrorist citizens and princes who go hunting with Bin-Laden, not to mention being officially sworn to destroy Israel, is hardly the sort of entity to manage secure ports on our shores. How well can we possibly have vetted the employees of such an outfit? And how do you pronounce Umm al-Qaiwain (one of the emirates) anyway? But President Bush has an answer for Vito -- a veto! If Congress legislates the transaction into oblivion, the President threatens to break out the veto pen. Bad move, Mr. Prez: you are ignoring some overriding concerns.
He defends the transaction on the basis of the fact that the UAE has been an ally in the War on Terror, is currently managing ports in other countries from which we receive a great deal of shipping, and it would send the wrong signal to black-list, or red-line, certain parts of the world as ineligible for significant roles in our economy. It seems obvious to me that most Americans believe that this would be precisely the right signal to send: we are not going to trust you guys until you show many, many years of incredibly clean security records. This is a flash of the famous Bush obstinacy, but for my money he's fighting a sure-lose battle.
In truth, my concern differs from Vito's a whit. I am the proud coiner of the maxim: "Matters of the moment are rarely matters of moment." The actual fear of a killer, or explosive cargo, osmosing through the Dubai port guys into our cities is slim indeed. It is remote that they would lose control over the screening. Their interest in making the job work for them would supersede any ideological predispositions. They may harbor grudges, but not on our harbors.
My concern is the opposite. Sure Dubai can purge their terrorists. They do it by making them take a long walk off a short pier. They do "mean" well, in fact they do it very well. Brutally, autocratically, repressively, they will out-terrorize the terrorists. Which means, in essence, that we are submitting to a protection racket. Because we fear the terrorists which those leaders allow to breed, the leaders can force us to hire them as the "experts" at cleaning up their own mess.
The War on Terror cannot be limited to fighting terrorists and preventing their achieving political ends through terrorism, nor is it sufficient to trounce the sovereigns that openly assist them. It must also prevent those nasty neighboring autarkies from making a cottage industry out of offering "protection" from the thugs. Look, I know how it works; in Mexico City I had to pay a kid to protect my car in a mall parking lot. Is it acceptable for us to be held hostage to the political version of that reality?
Using the same logic, Hamas should be the ideal party to govern the Palestinian Authority. After all, they have been the most effective at stopping terrorism. When they declare a truce, the bombings magically stop. Indeed the Emirates used to be known as the Trucial States, because their existence was founded on a truce they engineered in the battle of local Arabs against the British. If we want to defeat terror, we must prevent it from becoming a basis for any profiteering. Then we may return to our way of life (or Vito).
LOL, you just schooled that guy. :D
OK, so before everyone starts hyperventilating, does anyone really know what these companies running port facilities would entail?
It should be pointed out that these changes will not affect the security forces at these ports one iota.
I can't beleive that a Republican can stand the taste of this vomit in his mouth.
Neither of you has the slightest clue what is going on. On the other hand both of you have just become the handmaidens of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and their ilk.
You guys have been suckered with Democrat lies, and now are spewing Democrat vomit and don't even know it.
And the Soviet Union was an ally against Nazi Germany...
And the Afghani Mujahadeen was an ally against the Soviet Union...
And Iraq was an ally against Iran...
At least we're being consistent. Consistently WRONG.
This port deal is nothign but a Democrat pump-up that has suckered in all sorts of people who ought to know better.
It is race-baiting of the most cynical kind, and ought to make us sick. I know I am sickened, not by Bush, who is absolutely in the right, but by so-called conservatives who have been drawn out in the most brazen, bu tbrilliant play I have ever seen the Democrats pull off.
They will never tire of tossing our national security in the crapper for domestic poltical gain. We all know that.
But I didn't know how easily conservatives could be drawn off by the scent of this crap. It's disgusting to watch, and you all ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
I have to agree with you on what is actually happening - no biggie except the new management company is Arab. GWB is politically tone deaf. Over at DU land they are suggesting they go out and tangle with the longshoremen!! he he he he - I can't wait for this to happen. They don't know what they are messing with. below is from DU
ingin (21 posts) Wed Feb-22-06 12:08 AM Original message How To Stop the Sale of Our Ports. Shut Them Down! We need to shut down the ports in question. If Bush refuses to stop the sale, and congress doesn't act fast enough, we need to show them that we are serious. We need to picket the gates of the ports. Nothing in or out for at least one day. Even pugs can relate to this. The momentum is on our side. Read my posts on this at http://pleonexiabeyondhubris.blogspot.com / I live near the ports in Philly. The thought of this scares the crap out of me, and it should scare you to. Anybody up for a protest?
Yep. Started with Bush Sr. with Goals 2000. Since then it seems as if everything is being directed toward globalism. Guess who gets (is getting) dumbed down? Doesn't take a genius to figure it out.
" And the Soviet Union was an ally against Nazi Germany..."
" And the Afghani Mujahadeen was an ally against the Soviet Union..."
" And Iraq was an ally against Iran..."
I will keep your post for as long as I am a Freeper because all of those selective allies served their purpose and all they confronted are now in the "Ash Heap of history"
Nazi Germany = Vanquished
Soviet Union = Vanquished
Afghan Mujahadeen = Vanquished
Iraq = Vanquished
END OF STORY!
Thank You for the most delicious laugh I have had in months
I live in AZ and I could not agree with you more. McLame cannot win the nomination for '08, or bad things will happen to conservatives.
"THE STORY GOES ON!"
Glad you got a laugh out of it. The dead aren't laughing. You are one sick puppy.
now do you guys understand why i've i cannot support bush anymore...? this is just another bad piece of policy in a string of bad policy decisions that affect america as a nation and sovereign power...
War is ugly, and as long as they lose, I'm happy... How about you?
Yep, and if history tells us anything, we will be going to war with the UAE sooner than later. If you want to back the leftist pig in the White House, go ahead. He can't run again.
I liked Patton's idea. Don't stop in Berlin. Keep going east until the Soviet Union is crushed. Personally, I believe in "victory over rather than coexistence with any and all forms of communism".
Tens of millions of lives wouldn't have been lost in eastern europe if we'd kept right on going. That you find all of those needless deaths amusing is, quite frankly, disgusting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.