Skip to comments.
Israel warns of ‘evil axis’ World War
YNet ^
| Feb. 21, 2006
| Yitzhak Benhorin
Posted on 02/21/2006 1:49:24 PM PST by Alouette
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
1
posted on
02/21/2006 1:49:25 PM PST
by
Alouette
To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A Jovial Cad; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; adam_az; af_vet_rr; agrace; ahayes; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
2
posted on
02/21/2006 1:50:09 PM PST
by
Alouette
(Psalms of the Day: 108-112)
To: Alouette
We better not leave Israel to stand alone in this.
3
posted on
02/21/2006 1:50:44 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
To: Alouette
That would be one way to find out what happened to Sodom's WMDs. My bet would be on a Syrian stockpile.
4
posted on
02/21/2006 1:52:29 PM PST
by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: Alouette
Does anyone who's not asleep not see the major war headed our direction?
5
posted on
02/21/2006 1:53:46 PM PST
by
Taylor42
To: Alouette
I feel pretty confident that none of these countires will ever be able to wipe Israel off the map as no-one can Kick the GOD of all mankind from his promised land...
No way No how....
6
posted on
02/21/2006 1:55:34 PM PST
by
laney
(I now know who I am a *Crunchy Con*!)
To: Alouette
The arabs and Iranians are playing with fire, and they're about to get burned.
7
posted on
02/21/2006 1:57:44 PM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
To: laney
If you want to take the religeous point of view. Geopolitically and militarily, all of the arab armies combined have already tried unsucessfully 3 times. And it is not like they got any better at real warfare.
8
posted on
02/21/2006 1:58:01 PM PST
by
farlander
To: Taylor42
Does anyone who's not asleep not see the major war headed our direction? You would think, wouldn't you? But Neville Chamberlain is historical proof that supposedly intelligent people sometimes can't see the obvious, even when it's right in front of their faces.
9
posted on
02/21/2006 1:59:17 PM PST
by
jpl
("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
To: My2Cents
Bush has already come out and said the US would defend Israel militarily...the problem is Hamas, Syria, etc. will probably just wait for the next US election to see who is elected before waging a full scale war with Israel.
10
posted on
02/21/2006 2:01:59 PM PST
by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: Alouette
“Imagine al-Qaeda or the PKK running in elections? A dictator’s democracy is a dangerous false impression,” Could not have said it better myself.
You should never enter into a democratic contest with someone who doesn't believe in democracy, doesn't believe in the rule of law, doesn't respect the humanity of his political opponents. Such a person is deadly dangerous, your enemy; you don't settle your conflict with such a person by majority rule, you settle it by more definitive means, the dungeon and the bullet.
Your freedom is not up for grabs by the highest bidder, and no one should be allowed to run for office who is not sworn to respect your freedom. In the moment such a person is elected, you should consider your democracy to be broken, and you are in a state of revolution until he has departed the scene.
11
posted on
02/21/2006 2:04:27 PM PST
by
marron
To: Alouette
If you want to take the religeous point of view. Geopolitically and militarily, all of the arab armies combined have already tried unsucessfully 3 times. And it is not like they got any better at real warfare. That's why they need an atomic bomb. Maybe they can get Musharaff out of power in Nuclear armed Pakistan, and get a more sympathetic Muslim in power in his place.
Or given the time Iran will develop one. - Tom
12
posted on
02/21/2006 2:05:21 PM PST
by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
To: Alouette
Thank you Condi Rice. Thank you Pres. Bush.
Thank you Ariel Sharon. Thank you Ehud Olmert.
Failures all.
13
posted on
02/21/2006 2:05:43 PM PST
by
tomahawk
(Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
To: laney
You're correct.
Genesis 12:3 And I (GOD) will bless them that bless thee (Abraham), and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
14
posted on
02/21/2006 2:11:29 PM PST
by
ol' hoghead
(Some fiend stole my corkscrew. I've had nothing but food and water to live on this week)
To: ol' hoghead
And I believe that with all my heart and soul....
Thanks for posting that scripture...
15
posted on
02/21/2006 2:14:36 PM PST
by
laney
(I now know who I am a *Crunchy Con*!)
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
>That would be one way to find out what happened to Sodoms WMDs. My bet would be on a Syrian stockpile.<
BINGO!
16
posted on
02/21/2006 2:18:16 PM PST
by
Paperdoll
(On the cutting edge)
To: Alouette
17
posted on
02/21/2006 2:19:35 PM PST
by
APRPEH
(the UN is the biggest cartoon. lets riot......)
To: Alouette
18
posted on
02/21/2006 2:24:27 PM PST
by
presidio9
("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
To: farlander
And it is not like they got any better at real warfare. They don't need "real warfare" if they have nukes. If Iran drops a few nukes on Tel Aviv and a few other cities, followed by an immediate all out attack from Syria, Israel would be in a much worse position then they were in '67. Sure they could take out Tehran and Damascus, but that would only get the rest of the Muslim world in on the war too. Could they pull off what they did forty years ago, after having their cities devastated by a nuclear attack?
To: jpl
"But Neville Chamberlain is historical proof that supposedly intelligent people sometimes can't see the obvious, even when it's right in front of their faces."Actually, the more "intellectual" a person considers him or herself, the more easily they fail or refuse to see and accept the obvious.
20
posted on
02/21/2006 2:29:57 PM PST
by
Redleg Duke
(Kennedy and Kerry, the two Commissars of the Peoples' Republic of Massachusetts!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
