Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laney

If you want to take the religeous point of view. Geopolitically and militarily, all of the arab armies combined have already tried unsucessfully 3 times. And it is not like they got any better at real warfare.


8 posted on 02/21/2006 1:58:01 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: farlander
And it is not like they got any better at real warfare.

They don't need "real warfare" if they have nukes. If Iran drops a few nukes on Tel Aviv and a few other cities, followed by an immediate all out attack from Syria, Israel would be in a much worse position then they were in '67. Sure they could take out Tehran and Damascus, but that would only get the rest of the Muslim world in on the war too. Could they pull off what they did forty years ago, after having their cities devastated by a nuclear attack?

19 posted on 02/21/2006 2:25:49 PM PST by usapatriot28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
Geopolitically and militarily, all of the arab armies combined have already tried unsucessfully 3 times. And it is not like they got any better at real warfare.

Where it gets interesting is when China comes out on Iran's side.

65 posted on 02/23/2006 2:18:02 PM PST by Flavius Josephus (LSM: Controversy, Crap, & Confusion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson