Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Has Faith In President's Ports Sale Decision
Local10.com ^ | February 21, 2006 | Local10.com

Posted on 02/21/2006 11:08:07 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest

CORAL GABLES, Fla. -- Gov. Jeb Bush said he has faith in his brother's administration over its decision to allow an Arab-owned company to operate major U.S. ports, including in Miami.

Dubai Ports World, a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates, is expected to take over a British company that has been running six U.S. ports.

Several South Florida Congress members and politicians believe the deal should be closely examined.

U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said she has no specific concerns about the company, although the fact that UAE was where a number of the Sept. 11 hijackers were being harbored warrants further examination.

However, a former security director said there is little cause for concern.

"Being regulated by the federal government and by the state government puts a very high threshold of security standard for any operator at the Port of Miami," Nelson Oramas said.

Florida's governor, who attended a breakfast meeting at the Biltmore Hotel on Tuesday promoting the Central American Free Trade Agreement, said he thinks criticism by some Congress members is unwarranted because his brother, President George W. Bush, could press for more details by the time the sale is supposed to go through on March 2.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has said that the company went through a "very extensive" review process.

Nevertheless, the Republican governors of New York and Maryland said they might try to cancel lease arrangements at ports in their states.

Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sen. Robert Menendez are planning to introduce legislation that would prevent the sale of port operations to foreign governments.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: jebbush; uae; whatasurprise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: L98Fiero
What exactly will be different as a result of this corporate buy-out

I suppose the perception is that some low-level Al Queda type has a better chance of getting a job with the Dubai company than a British one and can then sneak a suitcase nuke on to a container.

Or something like that.

41 posted on 02/21/2006 11:37:06 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jess35

"This reminds me of the "Japan" is buying up all of the USA" hysteria we saw years ago."

Me too. I had heard it said many times that when I got older, I would have a Japanese boss and work for a Japanese company because they were buying everything. Pffft.


42 posted on 02/21/2006 11:37:18 AM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jess35
No, the Pubbies reacted (and rather hysterically, I might add) to the press release because of their political concerns. They're not worried about security. If they were, we'd have heard their concerns during this CFIUS process (it may have been conducted in secret, but let's be real here) or in the past week or two since the news has been made public. We didn't hear a peep until the MSM took up the banner for their DNC masters.
43 posted on 02/21/2006 11:38:15 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: butternut_squash_bisque

The PLA/ChiComs own the Long Beach port and the Panama Canal.


44 posted on 02/21/2006 11:38:34 AM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Menendez has it from the dock workers, they're going to strike if this deal goes thru.

Too bad the sheeple were led by the media.

We have a long way to go. Pity!

45 posted on 02/21/2006 11:39:10 AM PST by OldFriend (MSM ~ controversy, crap, & confusion.....compliments of Alan Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming
and can then sneak a suitcase nuke on to a container.

...which would still have to clear Customs, which falls under Homeland Security.

46 posted on 02/21/2006 11:39:20 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

If Savage isn't screaming, he isn't breathing.


47 posted on 02/21/2006 11:39:53 AM PST by OldFriend (MSM ~ controversy, crap, & confusion.....compliments of Alan Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
CORAL GABLES, Fla. -- Gov. Jeb Bush said he has faith in his brother's administration over its decision to allow an Arab-owned company to operate major U.S. ports, including in Miami.

This is a winner for the socialists(dems).

Jeb is cutting off his brothers escape route.

The press can slant this discussion either way and they will pick the side against Bush. The Repubs better get onboard with the dems and stop this. If it goes through, the Repubs will spend the next few years explaining why this was allowed to happen.

The press can pull people onto the front pages month after month to show how bad a decision the Bushies and Repubs made. The press can exaggerate situations to scare the American people.

It has to be congress, and the American people against the Bushies,and not the Dems and the American people against the Bushies and Repubs. - Tom

48 posted on 02/21/2006 11:39:58 AM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

"...which would still have to clear Customs, which falls under Homeland Security."

Only about 5% of containers are inspected. The other 95% is charged duties based on the manifests. Don't deceive yourself into thinking that container security has no holes. It has plenty of holes.


49 posted on 02/21/2006 11:40:53 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Coop; Siena Dreaming

The point was that it's the conservatives who began making a stink over this deal to begin with. I don't doubt for a moment the liberal media sees a chance at splitting conservatives and are taking advantage of it but the fact remains those originally drawing attention to it all were not them.


50 posted on 02/21/2006 11:41:21 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jess35
Now that our esteemed leader, Frist, has informed the President that if he doesn't cancel the deal, he,Frist will introduce legislation to end the deal.

Of course, they're all on vacation this week....AGAIN!

51 posted on 02/21/2006 11:41:41 AM PST by OldFriend (MSM ~ controversy, crap, & confusion.....compliments of Alan Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Will this be a wildcat strike....or does their contract allow them to handpick who will have the operations contract?

They can be replaced easily. I imagine the line of people waiting for their jobs is rather long.

52 posted on 02/21/2006 11:42:02 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Holes which were there before this deal, and holes which will remain whether or not this deal is cancelled. They're irrelevant to the argument (although of course not to our nation's security).


53 posted on 02/21/2006 11:42:05 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Now, I really feel sick. Yikes.


54 posted on 02/21/2006 11:43:13 AM PST by butternut_squash_bisque (Borders, Language, Cultureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Okay, I can see your point. But unless I see more convincing arguments from Savage or others who led this charge, I'll say they're as ill-informed as most others on this deal.


55 posted on 02/21/2006 11:43:50 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

The next idiot that says the Ports are OWNED by anyone or are being SOLD should be shut dow. The deal is a pretty straight merger where the acquiring company gets the rights to the operating agreements. The only solution to this is to force the Ports to run themselves. LOL.


56 posted on 02/21/2006 11:44:11 AM PST by Sunnyflorida ((Elections Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Look at post #7. Gulp. We're so not in control, it's pathetic.


57 posted on 02/21/2006 11:44:47 AM PST by butternut_squash_bisque (Borders, Language, Cultureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

I get it.. We're suppososed to turn to the DEMOCRATS on issues of national security, fiscal responsibility and border control...


58 posted on 02/21/2006 11:44:49 AM PST by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

WOrse -- the contract that no american company bid for was let back in 2000. These leases have been out there for years.

The leases are not expiring, and there is nothing really involving the U.S government here. Stockholders of the British Company O&P, which won the leases in 2000, have decided they want to sell their company. They put it on the market, there were two interested parties but in the end only one company even put in a bid, that was DP World, a company owned by the UAE (as so many companies are in this business -- Israel owns it's port companies for example).

Since the O&P company owned U.S. leases, the government had obligation by law to evaluate the sale for security issues. Note we are not selling anything, the administration didn't ASK for this, they had nothing to do with who is selling, or who is buying. They simply had to make a legal evaluation of the security issues. There are several, one involving an independent agency and one with the Homeland Security department.

All evaluations came up clean. Now people are saying Bush should have ignored the law and rigged the evaluations. Congress is pushing to make new laws to make this transfer illegal (not the ownership by O&P, but the sale to a company owned by a government).

That is their perogative, but they can't fault Bush for not blocking the sale since no current law allows it.

I think such a law should be carefully considered, as it has many negatives as regards free trade. It shouldn't be adopted in a knee-jerk reaction to this sale, based on political opportunism.


59 posted on 02/21/2006 11:45:23 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Frist needs to be reigned in on this. He's using it for political gain when he knows damned well that port security is the ball he and his fellow congressmen dropped.


60 posted on 02/21/2006 11:45:56 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson