Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Siena Dreaming
and can then sneak a suitcase nuke on to a container.

...which would still have to clear Customs, which falls under Homeland Security.

46 posted on 02/21/2006 11:39:20 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Coop

"...which would still have to clear Customs, which falls under Homeland Security."

Only about 5% of containers are inspected. The other 95% is charged duties based on the manifests. Don't deceive yourself into thinking that container security has no holes. It has plenty of holes.


49 posted on 02/21/2006 11:40:53 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Coop
Right, I tend to agree with you.

But here is the argument in some circles; that there is more chance of the terrorists getting a job with a Dubai company than a British one.

Safeguards are in effect, sure. But chances of more incidents grows with a Middle Eastern company in charge of the port as opposed to the British one.

I see Dubai as a fairly good ally myself. But what I said above is some of the logic from those dissenting.

64 posted on 02/21/2006 11:46:41 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson