Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jimmy Carter's Son: "I'm pro-choice as far as a woman choosing, but I'm against abortion"
LifeSiteNews ^ | 21 February 2006 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 02/20/2006 4:02:32 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

LAS VEGAS, February 20, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Jack Carter, 58, the eldest son of former U.S. President Jimmy Carter has announced he is seeking the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate to represent Nevada. At his launch, Carter spoke with reporters revealing his schizophrenic stand on abortion - a stand similar to that of his father.

Speaking with the Associated Press' Kathleen Hennessey, Carter described his abortion views saying, ""I'm a personal freedoms person. I don't want the government to come in and tell my child or whoever it is that they can't have an abortion. I'm pro-choice as far as a woman choosing, but I'm against abortion."

Stephen F. Hayward, PhD., wrote a 2004 book on Jimmy Carter noting the former President's political exploitation of abortion. In an interview with National Review, Hayward recalled Carter's abortion stand: "The 1976 campaign was the first national election after the Roe decision, and the politics of the issue were still sorting themselves out. Remember that Gerald Ford was pro-abortion, while many Democrats, including Sargent Shriver, one of Carter's rivals, were pro-life. In the Iowa caucuses, which Carter put on the map for the first time, Carter told Catholic audiences (and a gathering of bishops) that he opposed abortion and supported legislation to restrict it, thus cutting into Shriver's support. But he told feminist groups at the same time that he supported abortion rights (indeed, he had done so as governor of Georgia)."

The AP report reveals Jack Carter is Baptist and has, together with his wife Elizabeth, four children from previous marriages.

In 2000, LifeSiteNews.com reported that President Carter left the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC). Carter said at the time that the SBC had adopted policies "that violate the basic premises of my Christian faith," including a denominational statement that prohibits women from being pastors and tells wives to be submissive to their husbands.

However, Morris H. Chapman, chairman of the SBC Executive Committee, noted that Carter, who was originally embraced by Baptist conservatives in 1976 when he publicly described himself as a born-again Christian, lost favour with conservative Christians after such actions as appointing Sarah Weddington - the lead attorney in the landmark 1973 abortion case, Roe v. Wade - to the White House position when he was assistant to the president.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: 2006; abortion; allovertheshop; babykiller; babykillers; babykilling; braindeadjack; dopeydem; jackcarter; jimmah; jimmahjnr; nevada; roevwade; senate; wewontgetfooledagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-190 next last
To: TheMom

I know the point you are trying to make.
If you have an unwanted pregnancy your life will be hard, at least for a time. I have seen that suffering and it isn't easy to see. And maybe you have too. But aborting a child for that reason is a great injustice. Both those on the left and right sense that, and that's why there is discomfort.

I think that discomfort is a warning sign. How is it good for any society to promote or legalize injustice, even on the basis that it makes peoples lives easier in the short term?

A lot of peoples lives were wrecked when they lost their slaves during the Civil War. I imagine some starved. Does that mean we should have continued to allow slavery, so some peoples lives would be easier?


121 posted on 02/20/2006 6:33:58 PM PST by July4th64 ("If someone from Al Qaeda is calling you, we'd like to know why." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: TheMom
What I believe in is the right for a person to make that choice

Bless your heart but there is no difference. You are either for the unborn child whether it be yours or someone else or you are not. Not much difference in I am against slavery but everyone has a right to own one.....Morales is not something you can pick or choose. Again I ask, did your mother make the right choice and if she had made a different choice then your beautiful and wonderful children would have never been born and that my dear, would have been very, very sad for us all.......

122 posted on 02/20/2006 6:34:09 PM PST by Two-Bits (Attn Democrats: Radical Islam does not care whether you are a liberal or conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: TheMom; Eaker
After thinking about it, I figured that's what you meant.

This brings up an interesting issue. Hollyweired incorrectly thinks that there are no repercussions for bad choices. Oh yes, they DO have a choice! Unfortunately, they most often choose to make the wrong choice, and then when we tell them we're critical of them and that we're not going to buy their movies and such, they get offended and cry foul!

As you've correctly noted, they have the right to choose, but they don't comprehend the responsibility and repercussions of wrong choices.

It's a leftist trait to want power without responsibility. I see no greater illustration of this than the murder of our unborn.
123 posted on 02/20/2006 6:57:09 PM PST by hiredhand (My kitty disappeared. NOT the rifle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: stm
Actually, from what I recall of the Winston Groom novels Forrest Gump was akin to an Idiot savant.

The Carter family-on the other hand-is filled with people who are just plain idiots.

124 posted on 02/20/2006 7:12:26 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TheMom
No. I do not believe government on any kind should stick their nose in personal business.

IMPO, abortion should not be allowed after the first trimester.

Then who stops it if not government??

125 posted on 02/20/2006 7:12:36 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104; Aussie Dasher

ROFL -- my first two thoughts and you two had them in posts 1 and 2!


126 posted on 02/20/2006 7:12:53 PM PST by StarCMC (Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

Good points. I agree, I do think it will remain legal, permanently, because there isn't the political will to make it completely illegal. I DO agree with your point that the vast majority wants to keep it legal for rape, incest, life of the mother and birth defects. But I think there are more people who would either not mind or not mind too much if abortion just for the desire to abort were curtailed. I think the reasons to abort I mention above apply to something like 5% of abortions.


127 posted on 02/20/2006 7:13:34 PM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I'm pro-choice as far as a woman choosing, but I'm against abortion."

Huh!Thinking

128 posted on 02/20/2006 7:15:49 PM PST by mystery-ak (Army Wife and Mother.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The Carter House sits underneath a hole in the ozone layer.

Sort of like their own private Idaho.


129 posted on 02/20/2006 7:20:17 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Jimmy Carter's Son: "I'm pro-choice as far as a woman choosing, but I'm against abortion"

While I'm personally against lynching, if it works for Sheets Byrd....

130 posted on 02/20/2006 7:23:59 PM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"I'm pro-choice as far as a woman choosing, but I'm against abortion."

Maybe this guy needs to learn the meaning of courage of convictions. As opposed to being a wuss.
131 posted on 02/20/2006 7:25:10 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMom
No. I do not believe government on any kind should stick their nose in personal business.

The problem is....someone has to define "personal business".

If you say "business that doesn't effect some other person"....

Then we have to define "some other person".

At one point "negros" were less than persons. Jews have been "less than persons". Fetuses are less than persons.....(for now......)

132 posted on 02/20/2006 7:28:06 PM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

similar sire, similar scion


133 posted on 02/20/2006 7:28:10 PM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Like Mario Cumo and Kerry...and the rest of the infanticide bunch.

Both sides of their mouths...anything to get elected. political whores.


134 posted on 02/20/2006 7:29:50 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
*What?*

Excuse me, but I rather think that there is NO comparison between the legalized killing of unborn babies and smoking!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

135 posted on 02/20/2006 7:31:26 PM PST by Al Simmons ("Only those are fit to live who do not fear to die" - Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Two-Bits

Your argument holds no merit with me.

Slavery vs abortion??????? Please, come up with something better.

Yes, not only did my mother & I make the right choice, so did all my ancestors. But, if she had made the wrong decision then how would I know about the loss of my children?


136 posted on 02/20/2006 7:36:12 PM PST by TheMom (Dix now has a fellow Texan to talk politics with. R.I.P. TexasCowboy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

Stumped you?


137 posted on 02/20/2006 7:36:17 PM PST by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - Islam is the cancer, the US Military and Militia is the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

In the case of Jack, I believe Roslyn WAS just a little bit pregnant.


138 posted on 02/20/2006 7:38:50 PM PST by prairiebreeze (The Mainstream Media: today's carnival barkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Then who stops it if not government??

That is why I included the "IMPO".

The government does not have the right to interfere with personal decisions.

139 posted on 02/20/2006 7:38:51 PM PST by TheMom (Dix now has a fellow Texan to talk politics with. R.I.P. TexasCowboy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: TheMom
Can the government interfere one minute after the baby is born should the parents decide they want to kill the baby?

If they can , then why can't they intervene one minute before the baby is born?

You're not making any sense here MoM.

Why is is wrong to kill a baby that is partially delivered and near full term?

140 posted on 02/20/2006 7:40:57 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson