Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats may unite on plan to pull troops
Boston Globe ^ | February 20, 2006 | Rick Klein

Posted on 02/20/2006 6:08:22 AM PST by AZRepublican

WASHINGTON -- After months of trying unsuccessfully to develop a common message on the war in Iraq, Democratic Party leaders are beginning to coalesce around a broad plan to begin a quick withdrawal of US troops and install them elsewhere in the region, where they could respond to emergencies in Iraq and help fight terrorism in other countries.

The concept, dubbed ''strategic redeployment," is outlined in a slim, nine-page report coauthored by a former Reagan administration assistant Defense secretary, Lawrence J. Korb, in the fall. It sets a goal of a phased troop withdrawal that would take nearly all US troops out of Iraq by the end of 2007, although many Democrats disagree on whether troop draw-downs should be tied to a timeline.

Howard Dean, Democratic National Committee chairman, has endorsed Korb's paper and begun mentioning it in meetings with local Democratic groups. In addition, the study's concepts have been touted by the senator assigned to bring Democrats together on Iraq -- Jack Reed of Rhode Island -- and the report has been circulated among all senators by Senator Dianne Feinstein, an influential moderate Democrat from California.

The party remains divided on some points, including how much detail to include in a party-produced document, fearful of giving too much fodder for attacks by Republicans.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: chairmandean; cutandrun; dnc; dncstrategy; iraq; murtha; surrender; terrorism; troops; withdraw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 02/20/2006 6:08:23 AM PST by AZRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

And the 06-08 Dem platform solidifies. Should be a fun election cycle.


2 posted on 02/20/2006 6:09:53 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

The Democrat platform.
3 posted on 02/20/2006 6:11:33 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
It's 11.18.05 all over again?

"Murtha Urges Iraq Retreat"
4 posted on 02/20/2006 6:13:07 AM PST by jdm (You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
I reckon no one has advised the Dims that they aren't running the war.

Sure, they can attempt to deny funding for it.

Let them try.






5 posted on 02/20/2006 6:13:26 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
'The Iraqis want us to go," said Korb, who has opposed Bush's decision to invade Iraq from the start. ''If you're out by the end of 2007, we'll have been there almost five years. That's not cutting and running."

From the middle of said article.
6 posted on 02/20/2006 6:14:51 AM PST by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: AZRepublican

This is the same strange plan they had last year: pull out US troops from Iraq, camp out somewhere else in the region, and in the (very likely) event of civil war, re-invade Iraq for the 2nd time.


8 posted on 02/20/2006 6:14:53 AM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Rule #1: The Dims never learn.


9 posted on 02/20/2006 6:15:08 AM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Democrat's salute.
10 posted on 02/20/2006 6:15:35 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
Tell ya what guys, when you gain control of the house, senate, and the White House then MAYBE you will be able to achieve this lofty goal of yours.

Until then, STFU.


11 posted on 02/20/2006 6:18:08 AM PST by unixfox (AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Exactly right!

MEMO TO 'RATS:
You need to be the Commander in Chief to order the troops around. Your boy, Vietnam hack John 'effin Kerry LOST THE ELECTION. So, your party cannot order troops around.

There, the lesson in basic Constitutionalism is over. For now.

12 posted on 02/20/2006 6:18:15 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
...Senator Dianne Feinstein, an influential moderate Democrat from California.

Tha author is obviously on drugs.

13 posted on 02/20/2006 6:19:14 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
Demorat surrender Monkeys. Murtha's plan was to deploy forces to places like Okinawa?!?

Trying to objective, this plan assumes that the presence of our forces is the problem. I DISAGREE, our forces are turning over more and more territory to Iraqi forces. If we leave too early (before Iraqi forces are prepared) it will be abandoning Iraqis that had supported us. I would opine that while the Iraqis look forward to the day the USA leaves, they don't want us to leave until the time is right.
14 posted on 02/20/2006 6:21:17 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
And when any of them get elected to be Presidnet- then it will mean something. (I guess Dems don't understand that they need to be elected by the people afore they go actin all presidential and stuff...)(*twits*)
15 posted on 02/20/2006 6:24:06 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (Embrace peace- Hug an American soldier- the real peace keepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Defining and Defending the Terms of Our Surrender:

WE ARE the DEMOCRAT PARTY!


16 posted on 02/20/2006 6:25:51 AM PST by TheRobb7 (The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

True to form, there's still nothing printed on it.


17 posted on 02/20/2006 6:28:27 AM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diva Betsy Ross

I believe that what the article means to say, is that this will be their presidential platform for the 2008 election.

They are certainly entitled to run on this platform, although it will render their chances of winning nugatory.


18 posted on 02/20/2006 6:30:41 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

See post #18 above.


19 posted on 02/20/2006 6:31:20 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: facedown

Well, Ms. Feinstein just may be a moderate Democrat, even though she plays so far out in left field, Barry Bonds couldn't hit one over her. That just shows how insane and cowardly the rest of the democrats are.


20 posted on 02/20/2006 6:32:03 AM PST by Rider on the Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson