Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brit Hume: Bush Will Reverse Ports Decision
NewsMax ^ | 2/19/06 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 02/19/2006 10:30:27 AM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-285 next last
Comment #181 Removed by Moderator

Comment #182 Removed by Moderator

To: DoughtyOne; Stellar Dendrite
WELL DONE!!! I just did similar to Pukin Dog on another thread!

Stellar, check DoughtOne's post 105!

I am tired of the 'Bots drinking Industrial Strength Kool-Aid from the official "Cult of Bush" dribble chalices!

EVERU decision our Gub'Mint makes MUST be questioned by EVERYONE!

That is our right, and DUTY as citizens!

Unless we question the 'Bot demi-G_d!

183 posted on 02/19/2006 2:56:31 PM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775

But appearances mean a lot and frankly it just does not LOOK safe to have UAE controlling an area where we have been told we are weak

Your right. And, I'm sure this hasn't been lost on alot of evil islam terrorists.


184 posted on 02/19/2006 3:13:10 PM PST by Isabelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker


If this is true, Chertoff is going to get roasted on a spit at the alter political expediency.



185 posted on 02/19/2006 3:16:27 PM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

And then he goes on to say "we should not have them (any foreigners) running our ports."


186 posted on 02/19/2006 3:40:13 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: epow
It certainly is stupid, very stupid IMHO. Putting a Arab owned company in charge of American ports may be safe if what I have read about the people who will actually operate the ports is correct.

What is stupid is your ignorance. DPWorld bought out P&O in an old fashioned business acquisition and the P&O shareholders approved the sale.

If anything you have animus at the P&O shareholders. But what they hey you don't the facts so you blame Bush.

187 posted on 02/19/2006 3:50:23 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: buffmonster
Bush gave the OK on the deal. Just read the papers

Because DPWorld passed all the regulations.

BTW, what is your solution. Nationalize all the ports, create another huge beaucracy giving union goons and in to raid for more graft, or have a company that recruits the best western talent and will not be in charge of security at the port.

It's easy to b!tch, but I never see you Bush bashers bring up any solutions.

188 posted on 02/19/2006 3:53:59 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: epow

"...why allow the Dems to knock a big hole in that strong point when it isn't necessary?"

Oh puleeeeaze. There are billions at stake for cryin out loud. Course, we (avg joe citizen) won't ever get any of it. But what we'll get in the final is a nuke shoved up our collective colons...brought to our ports all safe and secure courtesy of a UAE (boo hoo but I thought they were our friends) cargo vessel.

Based on the empirical evidence before us, some might correctly conclude that money has taken precendent over our national security. What an effin nightmare.

beam me up scotty


189 posted on 02/19/2006 3:59:26 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: buffmonster

Welcome aboard!

And don't worry about getting called names or being ridiculed, we all are the targets from time to time.


190 posted on 02/19/2006 4:11:00 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Wrong. It was not too long after the American auto industry completely made junk and imports straightened their asses up.


191 posted on 02/19/2006 4:22:37 PM PST by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sgribbley

Yes, if you call handling the coordination of almost 80% of our troop's support. Without the UAE none of our troops would have chow halls in Iraq, or American citizens in support positions, or many other services. They are actually one of our best non-fighting allies over there. That is what I meant.


192 posted on 02/19/2006 4:26:46 PM PST by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: buffmonster

I understand your thoughts, but Turkey is one of our best allies in that region and they are Muslim. We actually have bases in their country. That Muslim nation are trying their best to be more like Europe, which is better than trying to be like some other countries.


193 posted on 02/19/2006 4:29:30 PM PST by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

I meant that buying American was not ALWAYS the best thing to do. If it was, we would still be driving around junk cars fashioned after most of the models in the '70's. My loyalty should not give companies permission to make crap, and by the way the unions are ruining America, she was pretty savy in my opinion.


194 posted on 02/19/2006 4:33:25 PM PST by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: buffmonster
But I noticed intense anger from the posters who didn't want Bush questioned at all on the Dubai purchase. Some even resorted to name calling posters who didn't agree with them. I felt compelled to join Freepers for the first time and lend a voice

Welcome and thanks for sharing your opinions on this matter

I voted for BUSH twice and I like him but on this issue he is making me furious if he lets it stand and lets the Dems take it on (and rightly so ) and reverse this however they can for our own national security and sanity!

I cannot imagine how the GOP can defend this insane plan to let ARABS run our ports.

This is a winner for the DEMS and I support whatever they can do to get it knocked down.

195 posted on 02/19/2006 4:41:54 PM PST by SunnyUsa (No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

Comment #196 Removed by Moderator

To: SunnyUsa
This is a winner for the DEMS and I support whatever they can do to get it knocked down.

No, it isn't. Because the DIMS offer nothing as an alternative. All the GOP has to do in the mid-year and national elections is come down heavy on the war on terror, add some photo ops of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan defending the homeland, and maybe a rerun of GWB landing on an aircraft carrier, and the Pubs win hands down.

Nobody in their right mind would vote for liberal America-hating backstabbers for janitor, much less responsible elective office.

197 posted on 02/19/2006 4:47:11 PM PST by Euro-American Scum (A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
One of the best "point" posts I've ever read on FR..

sw

198 posted on 02/19/2006 4:56:16 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/international-affairs/exon-florio/ Introduction. The United States has traditionally welcomed Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and provided foreign investors fair, equitable and nondiscriminatory treatment with few limited exceptions designed to protect national security. The Exon-Florio provision is implemented within the context of this open investment policy. The intent of Exon-Florio is not to discourage FDI generally, but to provide a mechanism to review and, if the President finds necessary, to restrict FDI that threatens the national security. The Exon-Florio provision is implemented by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ("CFIUS"), an inter-agency committee chaired by the Secretary of Treasury. CFIUS seeks to serve U.S. investment policy through thorough reviews that protect national security while maintaining the credibility of our open investment policy and preserving the confidence of foreign investors here and of U.S. investors abroad that they will not be subject to retaliatory discrimination. EXCERPT
199 posted on 02/19/2006 4:57:18 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow (Oust the IslamoCommies here and abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow

oops

http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/international-affairs/exon-florio/


200 posted on 02/19/2006 4:58:31 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow (Oust the IslamoCommies here and abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson