[vincentblackshadow]

Evolution would be considered a law if it wasn't for Christian Fundamentalists. There is no denying that Africa was once full of trees. When the climate became more arid and the trees in Africa became scarce, arboreal pre-hominids became nomadic. Fossil records prove the transition from arboreal 'ape like' species to a bipedal hominid.

1. big toes become larger and begin to position for balance

2.spine becomes more curved, providing cushion for walking
3.muscles in legs grow stronger in certain places to support long distance walking
4.cranium begins to grow larger (signs of spatial thinking growth) and eyes position to enable better peripheral vision.
5.hips widen to support torso

There is no denying the fossil evidence and the progression from Australopithecus to Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus to Homo Sapien

If a certain Freeper denies those fossil records, do you also refute the existence of dinosaurs?

[05 Mustang GT Rocks]

Evolution WAS the law in all the communist countries. Let's count how many people got murdered. And that is why we keep our guns ready for the time you atheist commies try to re-educate us. Then through the law of natural selection you are going to be extinct.
By the way, care to cite all the "fossil evidence" you blabber about in more detail?
Go back to North Korea, Kim!

[microgood]

There is no denying the fossil evidence and the progression from Australopithecus to Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus to Homo Sapien

So if they found a modern skull that was dated at 2,000,000 years, would your theory still be true?

[aligncare]

Other world religions also believe there is a 'creator'. No need to single out Christians.

[Tribune7]

There is no denying the fossil evidence and the progression from Australopithecus to Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus to Homo Sapien

Well, yes there is.

A. africanus used to be regarded as ancestral to the genus Homo (in particular Homo erectus). However, fossils assigned to the genus Homo have been found that are older than A. africanus. Thus, the genus Homo either split off from the genus Australopithecus at an earlier date (the latest common ancestor being A. afarensis or an even earlier form), or both developed from an as yet possibly unknown common ancestor independently.

[Doctor Stochastic]

Evolution would be considered a law if it wasn't for Christian Fundamentalists.

Not really. Evolution is, was, and will always be a theory. Laws describe observed regularities; theories attempt to explain observations.

[AnalogReigns]

The differences between Australopithecus to Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens are quite large...enough (as shown by the names) to qualify as each an entirely different species. Transitional forms between them...showing direct lineage are absent; quite a different matter than the existance of dinosaurs.

Your logic about evolution is fine, but based on a whole lot of assumptions.

Interestingly the USA and England have some of the most fundamentalist Darwinists in the world. Places in the developed world which are MORE secular, with almost no fundamentalist Christians, like France and Germany, have more scientists who openly question strict Darwinism today. Your theory blaming Christians is bogus.

[Havoc]

Evolution would not be considered a law. Sorry, there is an unwritten law of the universe that denies the possibility of evolution. It is simple. If I plant corn, corn and only corn will grow from the planted corn seed. This is proven day in day out zillions of times every year across millions of acres of farmland and has been so for recorded history. The same is true for any other planted seed. Change is not the law, constancy and reliability is. And that is a disproof of evolution all by itself. What's more, there is no arguing it.
And that's why I like it so much. It is an undeniable proof against evolution.

QED