Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vincentblackshadow
There is no denying the fossil evidence and the progression from Australopithecus to Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus to Homo Sapien

So if they found a modern skull that was dated at 2,000,000 years, would your theory still be true?
30 posted on 02/18/2006 2:12:29 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: microgood

I just posted something similar to this. Actually why don't we see the fossil record full of animals that are exactly as they are today? Should we not see a 300 million year old mammal? Or even a 300 million year old modern human. If you found one of those, then I would say there was a real problem with evolution.

The problem is, there isn't unless you know something I do not.


38 posted on 02/18/2006 2:16:28 PM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: microgood
So if they found a modern skull that was dated at 2,000,000 years, would your theory still be true?

Is this a hypothetical or do you have evidence of such?

43 posted on 02/18/2006 2:21:54 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson