To: vincentblackshadow
There is no denying the fossil evidence and the progression from Australopithecus to Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus to Homo Sapien
So if they found a modern skull that was dated at 2,000,000 years, would your theory still be true?
To: microgood
I just posted something similar to this. Actually why don't we see the fossil record full of animals that are exactly as they are today? Should we not see a 300 million year old mammal? Or even a 300 million year old modern human. If you found one of those, then I would say there was a real problem with evolution.
The problem is, there isn't unless you know something I do not.
38 posted on
02/18/2006 2:16:28 PM PST by
trashcanbred
(Anti-social and anti-socialist)
To: microgood
So if they found a modern skull that was dated at 2,000,000 years, would your theory still be true? Is this a hypothetical or do you have evidence of such?
43 posted on
02/18/2006 2:21:54 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson