Posted on 02/17/2006 3:43:01 PM PST by outofhere2
Michael Savage is talking to Chuck Schumer at this very minute.
"So according to you, everyone who listens to Savage is a stupid degenerate who enjoys watching fat chicks fight."
Until they're on the same side of some future issue, in which case Savage's IQ will jump 50 points and the fightin' fatties will be banished to Springer until they're politically useful again. Savage gets on my nerves. He strikes me as more than a bit unhinged. But, that doesn't make him always wrong.
Impeachment.... you got it! You should change your name to Psychic-Freep!!!
Pukin Dog, in your case I don't think it, I know you are.
The quality of some newbies is so lacking.
"If they don't even feel the need to come out and support their actions and policies, and fight back against the merciless slander the left throws at them, why should I spend my time, for free, to do it?"
Maybe because you are a Patriot and love your country. You know what the alternative would bring.
I agree we need a PROACTIVE PRESS in the Whitehouse!
LLS
In other words, anyone who will listen.
It's simple. If the Repubs want back in. They got to do two major things. Secure our borders. No more talk about a guest worker program because we all know what that is and its a joke. Secondly, no more deals like this one and Unesco because it makes our intervention in Iraq looked stupid. How can you say you are for National Security and hand over 6 major ports to a country where I believe they were rioting recently over cartoons?
He has already joined several other legislators in drafting the request to sanction an inquiry for impeachment. He listed the charges, and there are many. This is no trivial matter! They are dead serious and we need to realize it!
I concur with your conclusions about the real effects of the buyout. We all realize the perception of the buyout concerning national security will carry the greatest weight in this case. Logical or not, we will never convince the majority of Americans and their representatives in Congress differently.
As a member of management for a Fortune 500 petrochemical company, I had personal experience with a similar acquisition when our former USA company was purchased in the 1990’s by a consortium controlled by the Kuwaitis. There was no change (or “infiltration”) by the Kuwaitis in operation, policies, security, or personnel; absolutely none even after ten years. Other than references to the Kuwaitis in the annual report, we never knew they existed. Many of these acquisitions by Arab interests are simply financial vehicles to invest their oil revenues, and they have zero interest in the inner workings and management of the companies they acquire.
So if the Republicans don't acquiesce to your demands you will vote for who???? A Democrat? .... and they will do what you want because???? ...???
Do you really think they will be a better choice for accomplishing your goals? Have they ever been?
I don't understand your reasoning.
And all you have to do is get the ship into the port. You never have to unload it to do major damage.
Yes, same scenario both before and after this purchase.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.