Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China, Iran Near Huge Oil Deal
AP - Yahoo News ^ | 2/17/2006 | ELAINE KURTENBACH - AP

Posted on 02/17/2006 7:10:50 AM PST by Jeff Head

SHANGHAI, China - China and Iran are close to setting plans to develop Iran's Yadavaran oil field, according to published reports, in a multibillion-dollar deal that comes as Tehran faces the prospect of sanctions over its nuclear program.

The deal is thought potentially to be worth about $100 billion.

According to Caijing, a respected financial magazine, a Chinese government delegation is due to visit Iran as early as March to formally sign an agreement allowing China Petrochemical Corp., also known as Sinopec, to develop Yadavaran.

The Wall Street Journal also reported in Friday's editions that the two sides are trying to conclude the deal in coming weeks before potential sanctions are imposed on Iran for its nuclear ambitions. The report cited unnamed Iranian oil ministry officials familiar with the talks.

The deal would complete a memorandum of understanding signed in 2004.

In exchange for developing Yadavaran, one of Iran's largest onshore oil fields, China would agree to buy 10 million tons of liquefied natural gas a year for 25 years beginning in 2009, the Caijing report said, citing Sinopec board member Mou Shuling.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmedinejad; chicoms; chinesebuildup; chinesecommunists; dragonsfuryseries; energy; freeperjeffhead; hujintao; irannukes; iranthreat; lng; naturalgas; oil; radicalislam; redchinathreat; worldwariii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
This is exactly the type of thing we should all be very concerned about...Red China stepping into this and through their economic and military interests, blocking any effort to put a halt to Iran's nuclear efforts.

China is in the middile of this mix, and, IMHO, they certainley aren't on our side of the fence.

Terribly similar to the fictional Dragon's Fury Series scenario.

1 posted on 02/17/2006 7:10:53 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...

FYI...not good.


2 posted on 02/17/2006 7:12:25 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Looking too similar, IMHO.


3 posted on 02/17/2006 7:14:39 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
China, Iran, Syria, N. Korea, Venezuela...all aligning. Russia playing both endss against the middle...but swinging more to that camp.

We need to stand firm and resolute...and we'd best have a lot of steel in our composition the way this is shaping up. I hope I am completely wrong.

4 posted on 02/17/2006 7:17:58 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

It will be tough to drill for oil when everything glows.


5 posted on 02/17/2006 7:18:09 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

But maybe there is an upside to this - along the lines of a typical "protection racket". China wouldn't want any "accidents" to happen that would disrupt deliveries of their petroleum products, would they? Remember (cough, cough) that little matter of the unfortunate Clinton-era bombing error that took out the Chinese embassy in Yugoslavia? Unless the Iranian regime suddenly becomes very, very cooperative on the nuclear front, some innocent bystanders could be hurt (cough, cough). But a little insurance could be had if China would twist a few mullahs' arms, which would guarantee that the gas deliveries continue uninterrupted (hint, hint)...


6 posted on 02/17/2006 7:18:41 AM PST by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

So far, you are only wrong with the Indians---and that could be a big "except."


7 posted on 02/17/2006 7:19:00 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LS
Even India is keeping its options open...making deals and conducting exercises with both sides.

The new carrier they are refitting is Russian and will be filled with Russian aircraft and defense systems. They have conducted exercises with the Chinese military right along with the ones they conduct with us.

We need, IMHO, to be much more active in recruiting and brining them solidly into our camp. I hope and pray...and believe...we shall.

8 posted on 02/17/2006 7:23:20 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
FYI...not good.

I don't think so either, Jeff.  Thanks for the ping!

9 posted on 02/17/2006 7:24:26 AM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
I hope you are right and that we can have that type of influence...but I don't think we can count on it in the least.

The Chinese are aware of and applying this Sun Tsu saying..."All warfare is deception."

10 posted on 02/17/2006 7:24:56 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Just two bands of crazed thugs making a deal. Nothing to see here.


11 posted on 02/17/2006 7:26:09 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Yes, and they will use similar techniques against us (you wouldn't want to have any "accidents" with Los Angeles, would you?).


12 posted on 02/17/2006 7:26:49 AM PST by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

March 15, 2006 is just down the road, but I don't think the Chic*nts will make any moves until after the 2008 Olympics...until then, they want to look good, to the extent that any barbaric thugocracy can actually do so.


13 posted on 02/17/2006 7:28:29 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
It definitely adds to the pot. and its not a good mix.

I was wondering if we send in ground troops what would be China's take on protecting her economic assets.

14 posted on 02/17/2006 7:28:31 AM PST by tonycavanagh (We got plenty of doomsayers where are the truth sayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Is all of this gas and oil going to China via land routes?


15 posted on 02/17/2006 7:28:46 AM PST by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

And in the context could keep Pakistan in by acting as an "honest broker" between the two.


16 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:11 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Unless it is Oil for Nukes!Which I would not put past the friends of klinton.
17 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:22 AM PST by Steveone (Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Good political move by China...

The wreckless dolts with their heads in the sand running the American gub'mint had better realize we're further suseptible to economic blackmail if we continue to ignore our own oil resources and refineries, and developing alternative fuel sources besides oil. AND QUICK.

18 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:41 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Agreed. 2008 with the Olympics and an election here in the US is much more likely a time frame.


19 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:49 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
As an aside this long war is going to have an effect on the shaping of the Military, would it still be able to fight a conventional war as well as a whole series of insurgencies and nation building operations around the globe.
20 posted on 02/17/2006 7:30:03 AM PST by tonycavanagh (We got plenty of doomsayers where are the truth sayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson