Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam talked of WMD attack in U.S.
MSNBC ^ | Feb. 15, 2006 | Lisa Myers

Posted on 02/15/2006 5:37:12 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
The bold seems to me to be an explicit admission, and I am sure there is more, but MSM is spinning this as expected.
1 posted on 02/15/2006 5:37:15 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bookmaestro

ping


2 posted on 02/15/2006 5:40:22 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

what a clossal intelligence failure! we should have known about this in 2003!


3 posted on 02/15/2006 5:40:24 PM PST by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Yes, here is Olbermans proof that Iraq was no threat. Blah blah.


4 posted on 02/15/2006 5:41:30 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Importantly, though, many U.S. intelligence experts say the 12 hours of tape does not solve the riddle of whether Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction before the 2003 U.S. invasion...

It does for me Lisa.

5 posted on 02/15/2006 5:44:59 PM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
The MSM, like the FBI, is stuck on the idea that the anthrax attack was mounted by a single person ~ a disgruntled, white male, middle-aged or younger, with knowledge of how to make WMD.

Here we have Saddam Hussein and his guys talking about the stuff and how to do it ~

6 posted on 02/15/2006 5:45:34 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

The leftwing nutcases will simply say that even Saddam did not know he had no WMD.


7 posted on 02/15/2006 5:47:05 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Saddam planned to use his control of Iraq (which was nearly complete) to produce weapons that terrorists could use. They would likely move through many channels before they were employed, to establish distance from Saddam, but he fully intended to help the terrorist groups that would attack us directly.


8 posted on 02/15/2006 5:48:56 PM PST by giobruno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

And, Barbara Boxer was LECTURING Condoleeza Rice today about the NO WMD's failure......SHEESH.....


9 posted on 02/15/2006 5:48:57 PM PST by goodnesswins (Too many idiots....so little time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
“Where was the nuclear material transported to? A number of them were transported out of Iraq.”


It's out of there now...and sitting in Oakridge, TN. Few outside of the UN are complaining.
10 posted on 02/15/2006 5:49:47 PM PST by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
That's ok, if Sadaam himself thought he had WMD, how could we be sure he didn't?

Also, I remember clearly the Iraqi nuke scientist, one of Sadaam's sons brought him centrifuges and said hide these so we can rebuild our nuke program once the UN inspectors leave. The scientist hid them under rose bushes. To me this one incident proves they planned on building nukes first chance they got.

11 posted on 02/15/2006 5:52:03 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Just file this away like they did with the Sarin Gas IEDs from 2004 that were never fully reported...

or the sealed bunked that we weren't allowed to get into BEFORE the war....

or well, just list them....


12 posted on 02/15/2006 5:52:41 PM PST by MikefromOhio (Brokeback Mountain: The ONLY western where the Cowboys GET IT IN THE END!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Apparently this is just a small bit of the tapes as there is much more left to be translated, as well:

"Important to note that Brian Ross tonight on Nightline will stipulate that the Saddam tapes that intelligencesummit.org gave ABC News are just a small part of the assembled tape recordings of Saddam Hussein cabinet/staff meetings over many years. Also Brian Ross stipulates that the remaining available tapes are still undergoing translation." AmSpec Blog

13 posted on 02/15/2006 5:54:52 PM PST by Catphish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Holy smokes, they're already trying to spin this story to an early grave. Four days of non-stop Cheney, but what do you want to bet this story gets buried faster than Vince Foster.


14 posted on 02/15/2006 5:56:47 PM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Importantly, though, many U.S. intelligence experts say the 12 hours of tape does not solve the riddle of whether Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction before the 2003 U.S. invasion...

Well gee, I thought that Bush Lied, people died. I thought we knew for a fact that the WMD didn't exist. Isn't that what they've been telling us all this time?

Now that these tapes are made public, they move the goalpost and pretend that we haven't been insisting all along that the riddle had not been solved, as they claimed.

15 posted on 02/15/2006 5:57:39 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I heard some selected parts of the translated audio on television earlier today and it became obvious to me that anyone who used the WMD card on Bush regarding the US military campaign in Iraq owes him a huge apology. There it was, in Saddam's own voice. Undeniable. The smoking gun. I then came back to earth and realized this would never happen because decorum and honor are nonexistent concepts in today's democratic party and the mainstream media. We saw it at the King funeral. They are nothing but pigs.


16 posted on 02/15/2006 5:57:47 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

But not from Iraq (because we gave them to AQ).


17 posted on 02/15/2006 5:58:46 PM PST by Peach (Hillary ran over a cop and didn't even stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Lisa Myers writes for something called the MSNBC Investigative Unit. Anyone know of anything they have ever actually investigated? Seems all the ever do is regurgitate leftist "nose pickings" from the NYT or WP.


18 posted on 02/15/2006 5:59:16 PM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
PAY NO ATTENTION TO THIS INFORMATION PROPLE. PAY NO ATTENTION TO THIS INFORMATION. Nothing can conflict with the MSM template that Bush lied.

/s

19 posted on 02/15/2006 6:00:52 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

MSM and the Democrats also have a lot invested in the idea that there were no WMDs in Iraq. The more the people believe that there were WMDs in Iraq, the bigger hit they take.


20 posted on 02/15/2006 6:01:29 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson