The bold seems to me to be an explicit admission, and I am sure there is more, but MSM is spinning this as expected.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Bookmaestro
2 posted on
02/15/2006 5:40:22 PM PST by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Anti-Bubba182
what a clossal intelligence failure! we should have known about this in 2003!
3 posted on
02/15/2006 5:40:24 PM PST by
minus_273
To: Anti-Bubba182
Yes, here is Olbermans proof that Iraq was no threat. Blah blah.
4 posted on
02/15/2006 5:41:30 PM PST by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Importantly, though, many U.S. intelligence experts say the 12 hours of tape does not solve the riddle of whether Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction before the 2003 U.S. invasion... It does for me Lisa.
To: Anti-Bubba182
The MSM, like the FBI, is stuck on the idea that the anthrax attack was mounted by a single person ~ a disgruntled, white male, middle-aged or younger, with knowledge of how to make WMD.
Here we have Saddam Hussein and his guys talking about the stuff and how to do it ~
6 posted on
02/15/2006 5:45:34 PM PST by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Anti-Bubba182
The leftwing nutcases will simply say that even Saddam did not know he had no WMD.
7 posted on
02/15/2006 5:47:05 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: Anti-Bubba182
Saddam planned to use his control of Iraq (which was nearly complete) to produce weapons that terrorists could use. They would likely move through many channels before they were employed, to establish distance from Saddam, but he fully intended to help the terrorist groups that would attack us directly.
8 posted on
02/15/2006 5:48:56 PM PST by
giobruno
To: Anti-Bubba182
And, Barbara Boxer was LECTURING Condoleeza Rice today about the NO WMD's failure......SHEESH.....
9 posted on
02/15/2006 5:48:57 PM PST by
goodnesswins
(Too many idiots....so little time.)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Where was the nuclear material transported to? A number of them were transported out of Iraq.
It's out of there now...and sitting in Oakridge, TN. Few outside of the UN are complaining.
10 posted on
02/15/2006 5:49:47 PM PST by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Just file this away like they did with the Sarin Gas IEDs from 2004 that were never fully reported...
or the sealed bunked that we weren't allowed to get into BEFORE the war....
or well, just list them....
12 posted on
02/15/2006 5:52:41 PM PST by
MikefromOhio
(Brokeback Mountain: The ONLY western where the Cowboys GET IT IN THE END!!!)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Apparently this is just a small bit of the tapes as there is much more left to be translated, as well:
"Important to note that Brian Ross tonight on Nightline will stipulate that the Saddam tapes that intelligencesummit.org gave ABC News are just a small part of the assembled tape recordings of Saddam Hussein cabinet/staff meetings over many years. Also Brian Ross stipulates that the remaining available tapes are still undergoing translation." AmSpec Blog
13 posted on
02/15/2006 5:54:52 PM PST by
Catphish
To: Anti-Bubba182
Holy smokes, they're already trying to spin this story to an early grave. Four days of non-stop Cheney, but what do you want to bet this story gets buried faster than Vince Foster.
14 posted on
02/15/2006 5:56:47 PM PST by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Importantly, though, many U.S. intelligence experts say the 12 hours of tape does not solve the riddle of whether Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction before the 2003 U.S. invasion...Well gee, I thought that Bush Lied, people died. I thought we knew for a fact that the WMD didn't exist. Isn't that what they've been telling us all this time?
Now that these tapes are made public, they move the goalpost and pretend that we haven't been insisting all along that the riddle had not been solved, as they claimed.
15 posted on
02/15/2006 5:57:39 PM PST by
alnick
To: Anti-Bubba182
I heard some selected parts of the translated audio on television earlier today and it became obvious to me that anyone who used the WMD card on Bush regarding the US military campaign in Iraq owes him a huge apology. There it was, in Saddam's own voice. Undeniable. The smoking gun. I then came back to earth and realized this would never happen because decorum and honor are nonexistent concepts in today's democratic party and the mainstream media. We saw it at the King funeral. They are nothing but pigs.
16 posted on
02/15/2006 5:57:47 PM PST by
SpaceBar
To: Anti-Bubba182
But not from Iraq (because we gave them to AQ).
17 posted on
02/15/2006 5:58:46 PM PST by
Peach
(Hillary ran over a cop and didn't even stop.)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Lisa Myers writes for something called the MSNBC Investigative Unit. Anyone know of anything they have ever actually investigated? Seems all the ever do is regurgitate leftist "nose pickings" from the NYT or WP.
To: Anti-Bubba182
PAY NO ATTENTION TO THIS INFORMATION PROPLE. PAY NO ATTENTION TO THIS INFORMATION. Nothing can conflict with the MSM template that Bush lied.
/s
To: Anti-Bubba182
""We shouldnt be surprised to see a car bomb with nuclear [material] explode [in] Washington, either germ or chemical," Saddam tells aides. "So this is coming, Saddam says on the tapes, but not from Iraq," he adds, seeming to indicate that Iraq would not be the source of any such attack.[snip]..."
this is interesting, as it is the same thing many here have worried about for a long time. Hussein apparently could see what the democrats could not and can not.
To: Anti-Bubba182
Where was the nuclear material transported to? A number of them were transported out of Iraq. He also says: We will confess, but not to the biological program.
It certainly shows that he was trying to deceive the U.N., but it doesn't show that he actually had weapons in his possession at the time of the invasion, says Bill Harlow, a former CIA spokesman and an NBC News analyst.
Uhhhhh... sorry Bill, but the liberal argument has always been that he didn't have them AT ALL, not that he didn't have them at the start of the invasion. Also, Hussein isn't waxing hypothetical, he's speaking in a literal sense about tangible objects and factual information.
24 posted on
02/15/2006 6:08:23 PM PST by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
To: Anti-Bubba182
MSNBC adds its own editorial comment above the story saying essentially 'Saddam's obsession with WMD does not prove he had them.' Jerks! Saddam's WMD were moved by Russian troops secretly to Syria just before we invaded Iraq. Everybody knows the truth. But the MSM refuses to print the truth.
27 posted on
02/15/2006 6:22:45 PM PST by
ex-Texan
(Matthew 7:1 through 6)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson