To: MRMEAN
we all know , or have known stoners, some of whom we like , some we don't, much like alcoholics.
The question we must answer is this.. do we want our sons and daughters operating vehicles or other dangerous equipment around and/or with people who are "legally" stoned? We don't want them doing it with those who are " illegally" drunk. Why should being stoned be any more acceptable?
19 posted on
02/15/2006 2:40:00 PM PST by
pipecorp
(Let's have a CRUSADE! , the muslims never stopped. a 2010 useless reply odyssey.)
To: pipecorp
1. Alcohol is a legal and controlled (via state law) substance.
2. Every draconian law ever passed in this country for the past century has been "for the children." "For the children" has replaced "protecting white womanhood" as the excuse for politicians to pass the most asinine, moralistic laws.
27 posted on
02/15/2006 2:45:56 PM PST by
Clemenza
(I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked...)
To: pipecorp
do we want our sons and daughters operating vehicles or other dangerous equipment around and/or with people who are "legally" stoned? We don't want them doing it with those who are " illegally" drunk. Why should being stoned be any more acceptable?
Are you high? Once we legalize marijuana, we can't possibly have any drunk driving laws that apply to people that are high on whatever substances?
239 posted on
02/16/2006 12:26:54 AM PST by
Quick1
(Censorship: the worst obscenity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson