Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reject Notion That We're Winning War on Drugs
The Southwest News-Herald ^ | February 15, 2006 | By JACOB G. HORNBERGER

Posted on 02/15/2006 2:22:52 PM PST by MRMEAN

Conservatives never cease to fascinate me, given their professed devotion to “freedom, free enterprise, and limited government” and their ardent support of policies that violate that principle.

One of the most prominent examples is the drug war. In fact, if you’re ever wondering whether a person is a conservative or a libertarian, a good litmus-test question is, How do you feel about the war on drugs? The conservative will respond, “Even though I believe in freedom, free enterprise, and limited government, we’ve got to continue waging the war on drugs.” The libertarian will respond, “End it. It is an immoral and destructive violation of the principles of freedom, free enterprise, and limited government.”

The most recent example of conservative drug-war nonsense is an article entitled “Winning the Drug War,” by Jonathan V. Last in the current issue of The Weekly Standard, one of the premier conservative publications in the country.

In his article, Last cites statistics showing that drug usage among certain groups of Americans has diminished and that supplies of certain drugs have decreased. He says that all this is evidence that the war on drugs is finally succeeding and that we just need to keep waging it for some indeterminate time into the future, when presumably U.S. officials will finally be able to declare “victory.”

Of course, we’ve heard this type of “positive” drug-war nonsense for the past several decades, at least since Richard Nixon declared war on drugs back in the 1970s. What conservatives never tell us is how final “victory” will ultimately be measured. Like all other drug warriors for the past several decades, Last doesn’t say, “The statistics are so good that the drug war has now been won and therefore we can now end it,” but rather, “Victory is right around the corner. The statistics are getting better. Let’s keep going.”

Last failed to mention what is happening to the people of Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, where drug lords compete violently to export illegal drugs into the United States to reap the financial benefits of exorbitant black-market prices and profits that the drug war has produced.

Recently, drug gangs fired high-powered weapons and a grenade into the newsroom of La Manana, killing Jaime Orozco Tey, a 40-year-old father of three.

Several other journalists have been killed in retaliation for their stories on the drug war, and newspapers are now self-censoring in fear of the drug lords. There are also political killings in Nuevo Laredo arising out of the drug war, including the city's mayor after he had served the grand total of nine hours in office.

According to the New York Times, “In Nuevo Laredo, the federal police say average citizens live in terror of drug dealers. Drug-related killings have become commonplace.” The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists says that the U.S.-Mexico border region is now one of the world’s most dangerous places for reporters.

Not surprisingly, Last did not mention these statistics in his “We’re winning the drug war” article.

During Prohibition, there were undoubtedly people such as Last claiming, “Booze consumption is down. We’re winning the war on booze. Al Capone is in jail. We’ve got to keep on waging the war on booze until we can declare final victory.”

Fortunately, Americans living at that time finally saw through such nonsense, especially given the massive Prohibition-related violent crime that the war on booze had spawned. They were right to finally legalize the manufacture and sale of alcohol and treat alcohol consumption as a social issue, not a criminal-justice problem.

Both conservatives and liberals have waged their war on drugs for decades, and they have reaped nothing but drug gangs, drug lords, robberies, thefts, muggings, murders, dirty needles, overcrowded prisons, decimated families, record drug busts, government corruption, infringements on civil liberties, violations of financial privacy, massive federal spending, and, of course, ever-glowing statistics reflecting drug-war “progress.”

Americans would be wise to reject, once and for all, the war on drugs, and cast drug prohibition, like booze prohibition, into the ashcan of history.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: barfalert; chemicaldependency; crappywodthread; druggies; drugs; dudewheresmybong; libertarians; losertarians; mrleroy; pagingmrleroy; soros; substanceabuse; thatsmrleroytoyou; warondrugs; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-288 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2006 2:22:54 PM PST by MRMEAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

Not all conservatives support the war on drugs, as every thread on the topic shows.


2 posted on 02/15/2006 2:24:25 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
More libertarian nonsense.

That said, some changes need to be made. First of all, possession and use of drugs should not be nearly the crime it is. I don't think it should be any worse than running a stop light. You get a citation and a fine for it. Selling illegal drugs, however, should be a felony with serious prison time associated with it.
3 posted on 02/15/2006 2:25:39 PM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

Anybody watch Frontline last night? We are NOT winning the war on drugs.


4 posted on 02/15/2006 2:26:30 PM PST by BigTex5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigTex5

"We are NOT winning the war on drugs."



No, but if we only spent more of our tax money and created even more fed. gov't, we would.

/sarc


5 posted on 02/15/2006 2:27:48 PM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

/sarcasm is so true. We affectively shutdown Qualudes by making the chemical companies STOP making one chemical. Frontline was on Meth use. Turns out its Effedrin that is the key ingredient. US gov't wanted to do the same thing, but regulate who buys the effedrin from suppliers. The drug companies stepped and lobbied. The drug companies won.


6 posted on 02/15/2006 2:30:19 PM PST by BigTex5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigTex5

"We are NOT winning the war on drugs."

And we never will in a free society.


7 posted on 02/15/2006 2:30:30 PM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

At least he admits there is a big difference between conservatives and libertarians.


8 posted on 02/15/2006 2:30:32 PM PST by CWOJackson (Tancredo? Wasn't he the bounty hunter in Star Wars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

No we are not right now, but if we tried to win we would if we got rid of dope smoking greeners like you.


9 posted on 02/15/2006 2:30:36 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigTex5

Without secure borders, the situation will only get worse.... The first order of business in this war should be to secure the Mexican border. That would help in the war against illegal aliens invading us...


10 posted on 02/15/2006 2:30:40 PM PST by seamusnh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

Do you also want to build more prisons? At least 50% of prison populations are for drug related charges.


11 posted on 02/15/2006 2:31:30 PM PST by BigTex5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
The conservative will respond, “Even though I believe in freedom, free enterprise, and limited government, we’ve got to continue waging the war on drugs.” The libertarian will respond, “End it. It is an immoral and destructive violation of the principles of freedom, free enterprise, and limited government.”

Guess that makes me a libertarian, then. Tend to be suspicious of any political philosophy that needs to include phrases like "even though".
12 posted on 02/15/2006 2:32:09 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
And we never will in a free society.

In a truly free society, we wouldn't even be having this discussion, because there would be no "war on drugs".
13 posted on 02/15/2006 2:33:05 PM PST by augggh (Falsehood is invariably the child of fear in one form or another. - AC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BigTex5

I have an idea!!!! Since most drugs come from Mexico anyway, lets bus all the prisoners for drug related charges to Mexico. By this time the wall will be in place, so they can smoke dope all they want now!


14 posted on 02/15/2006 2:33:45 PM PST by BigTex5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
Libertarians, sigh.

I am all for legalizing drugs after you end welfare. You can’t do one without doing the other first.

15 posted on 02/15/2006 2:33:47 PM PST by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

How are people going to get the drugs unless someone sells them?


16 posted on 02/15/2006 2:35:23 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad
but if we tried to win we would

So we are fight a wart on drugs, but not trying to win? I guess if they won, they'd be out of a job, must perpetuate...

17 posted on 02/15/2006 2:35:28 PM PST by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: augggh

"In a truly free society, we wouldn't even be having this discussion, because there would be no "war on drugs"."

No arguement here.


18 posted on 02/15/2006 2:36:13 PM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
we all know , or have known stoners, some of whom we like , some we don't, much like alcoholics.
The question we must answer is this.. do we want our sons and daughters operating vehicles or other dangerous equipment around and/or with people who are "legally" stoned? We don't want them doing it with those who are " illegally" drunk. Why should being stoned be any more acceptable?
19 posted on 02/15/2006 2:40:00 PM PST by pipecorp (Let's have a CRUSADE! , the muslims never stopped. a 2010 useless reply odyssey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Was this article paid for by George Soros? If the Carly Bruglia murderer's account of his drug induced killing frenzy didn´t make anyone realize the need for drug control, I don´t know what will.

Remember that millions of dollars go into lobbying and the push for an open drug market. For our kids sake, don't fall for it.

20 posted on 02/15/2006 2:40:00 PM PST by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-288 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson