Skip to comments.
Ohio Poll: 3 to 1 Margin Supports Teaching Evolution Controversy
DISCOVERY INSITITUTE NEWS ^
| 02/13/2006
Posted on 02/15/2006 10:25:06 AM PST by SirLinksalot
|
Discovery Institute News
1511 3rd Ave Suite 808 - Seattle, WA 98101 - (206) 292-0401 x107 |
Ohio 2006 Poll Results Executive Summary |
By: Staff Discovery Institute February 13, 2006 |
This was a telephone survey of Ohio likely voters conducted by Zogby International 2/2/06 thru 2/3/06. The target sample is [601] interviews. The margin of error is +/- 4.1 percentage points.
Click here to see the complete poll results.
Which of the following two statements come closest to your own opinion? A) Biology teachers should teach only Darwins theory of evolution and the scientific evidence that supports it. B) Biology teachers should teach Darwins theory of evolution, but also the scientific evidence against it. C) Neither/Not Sure
In 2006 in Ohio: A = 19% B = 68.8% C = 12%
In 2002 in Ohio: A = 19% B = 65% C = 16
Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the following statement: When Darwins theory of evolution is taught in school, students should also be able to learn about scientific evidence that points to an intelligent design of life. 1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure
In 2006 in Ohio: 1. Strongly agree 56.4% 2. Somewhat agree 19.3% Agree 75.7% 3. Somewhat disagree 5.0% 4. Strongly disagree 13.0% Disagree 18% 5. Not sure 5.9%
In 2002 in Ohio: Strongly agree 55% Somewhat agree 23% Agree 78% Somewhat disagree 3.0% Strongly disagree 10% Disagree 13% Not sure 9.0%
Some other interesting findings:
Of those that agreed: Biology teachers should teach Darwins theory of evolution, but also the scientific evidence against it.
- 78.6% of Republicans agreed, 58.6% of Democrats agreed, and 67% of Independents agreed.
- 70% of men agreed, and 67.8% of women.
- 51% had some high school, 69% graduated high school, 67.8% had some college, 70% had college degrees.
Of those that agreed: When Darwins theory of evolution is taught in school, students should also be able to learn about scientific evidence that points to an intelligent design of life.
- 84.3% of Republicans agreed, 66.2% of Democrats and 75.2% of Independents agreed.
- 73.1 of men agreed, and 78.1% of women.
- 67.2% had some high school, 81% graduated high school, 82.5% had some college, 69.6% had college degrees.
Click here to see the complete poll results.
|
Discovery Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan, public policy think tank headquartered in Seattle and dealing with national and international affairs. For more information, browse Discovery's Web site at: http://www.discovery.org. |
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: controversy; crevolist; evolution; id; ohiopoll; scienceeducation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: Elsie; God
To: cogitator
To: Coyoteman
Or sunset, depending on where the shot was taken?
63
posted on
02/17/2006 8:07:17 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: editor-surveyor
64
posted on
02/17/2006 8:14:57 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Coyoteman
Well THAT sure led me off for a while!
65
posted on
02/17/2006 1:37:27 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: editor-surveyor
You must be speaking of a different Stephen Gould than the one that wrote Wonderful Life, since in that book he plainly stated that Darwin's theory was in complete 180 degree disagreement with the observable fossil evidence. I very much doubt it. Citation please, with context.
Gould even went so far as to dub the fossil record as a "cone of decreasing diversity" rather than the "cone of increasing diversity that is required by Darwin."
Context please.
To: curiosity
"
Context please." I gave you the context. Read the book for yourself.
67
posted on
02/18/2006 11:40:01 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: Dan(9698)
That is as strong a statement of faith as I have seen. No, it's a qualitative probability estimate based on observation. Nice try though... ;-)
To: SirLinksalot
So how is Gould's theory a logical fallacy? Gould's theory is not a logical fallacy ... it is a brilliant display of 'find the nut under the shell' game, with one difference ... there's no nut under there. Gould realized that the fossil record does not contain what Darwin requires ... "innumerable transitional forms." Rather, it contains a record of rapid appearance, stasis, and extinction. Evolution occurs too rapidly to leave any visible remains.
The evo-fundies on FR often maintain that its critical for a 'real' scientific theory to make predictions.
Well Gould had finally come up with the best theory possible to explain evolution ... his theory actually predicts that you won't find any evidence to support it!
69
posted on
02/20/2006 7:53:24 AM PST
by
dartuser
(My sincere prayer for terrorists everywhere ... may they rest in pieces.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson