[birbear]

You know damn well if it had been somebody like say Al Gore, who had shot somebody, we'd be screaming for Al Gore to be frog marched into prison.

[VRWCmember]

You know damn well if it had been somebody like say Al Gore, who had shot somebody, we'd be screaming for Al Gore to be frog marched into prison.

That's because if algore shot somebody, it wouldn't have been a hunting accident.

[frogjerk]

You know damn well if it had been somebody like say Al Gore, who had shot somebody, we'd be screaming for Al Gore to be frog marched into prison.

Speak for yourself. Maybe you, but if it was a genuine accident (your Gore hypothetical), why would I want an innocent man go to jail? I don't think Freeper would support putting an innocent man in jail. That sounds very DU like...

[Jalapeno]

You know damn well if it had been somebody like say Al Gore, who had shot somebody, we'd be screaming for Al Gore to be frog marched into prison.

You should have worded your sentence this way:

"...if it had been somebody like say Al Gore, who had shot somebody, accidentally..."

Of course, then the argument makes no sense.

[Flavius Josephus]

That doesn't follow and it isn't true. Speak for yourself.

[stuartcr]

Absolutely correct.

[HOTTIEBOY]

I think you are right. But the argument would switch to the fact that the dems are supposed to be anti-guns and don't shoot the helpless (delicious) quail.

And your dog is not cuter than mine. No way.

[PackerBronco]

You know damn well if it had been somebody like say Al Gore, who had shot somebody, we'd be screaming for Al Gore to be frog marched into prison.

Well, if we're going to accuse people using hypotheticals, let me add mine: "You know damn well if Al Gore had shot somebody, he would've covered it up and had someone else in the hunting party take the blame."