[Bloody Sam Roberts]

He said actual sex acts are needed to help win prostitution convictions.

And one more thing....bullcrap.

The sex act isn't illegal. Taking money for it is. Once money changes hands for the promise of sexual favors, the arrest can be made. No other "evidence" is necessary.
Talk about horny flatfoots.

[MortMan]

Hmmm... Johns are arrested after naming a price, but the prostitutes themselves have to get serviced first?

[Emmett McCarthy]

Clinton clearly missed a perfect defense - he was just trying to "get evidence" on Monica. Oh, no, wait - he DID get evidence on Monica, well, on her dress anyway.

[El Gran Salseron]

"The sex act isn't illegal. Taking money for it is. Once money changes hands for the promise of sexual favors, the arrest can be made. No other "evidence" is necessary."

Laws vary from county to county, city to city and state to state so your flat statement is moot for people in other counties, cities and states.

[Terabitten]

The sex act isn't illegal. Taking money for it is. Once money changes hands for the promise of sexual favors, the arrest can be made.

Ding ding ding!

[Jersey Republican Biker Chick]

"The sex act isn't illegal. Taking money for it is. Once money changes hands for the promise of sexual favors, the arrest can be made. No other "evidence" is necessary."

To prevent arrest, a lot of these parlors have a pay after the service is completed policy. Because in the past, the officers could not engage in the sex act. Thus weeding out the undercover cops. This policy now gives law enforcement a leg up, so to speak.