Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother
Actually, when you're bird hunting there's lots of potential for fault. The shooter has to keep the muzzle pointed away from his partners, and not swing across the line, BUT everybody has to keep everybody else notified of their whereabouts. If the victim left his station in the line and moved forward or back, he's supposed to let his partners know. Otherwise, it's as though somebody steps out beyond the firing line on a stationary range -- only more dangerous because there's no set firing line, it's moving all the time.

I've hunted for over thirty years. Everything from upland small game -- rabbits, squirrels, birds, to deer. No waterfowl, no bear.

And while, yes, it is "the responsible thing to do" for a "potential target" to do everything in reason to ensure that he is visible as a human (hence, the near-universal "hunter-orange" clothing laws), the fact remains, that if I pull the trigger on you, I am to blame, period.

It's no different from the ("classic") "rear-end accident."

In fact, when my body was ruined in a "rear-ender", the ***** who flew into me while I was stopped behind another car at the intersection got into a pissing match with the cop, demanding that he ticket ME, because, as she put it, "It was HIS fault!"

The cop finally threw up his hands and said OK, fine -- what should I ticket him for? (This little adventure was related to me after the fact by one of the numerous witnesses.)

Suffice it to say she got the ticket and I nearly bought the farm.

Yeah, I should have had "working brake lights", to warn her that I was stopping. (And I did!) But regardless, it was HER responsiblity to "maintain control over her vehicle".

When you point the muzzle of your gun at something, and you pull the trigger, then you own the results of whatever happens when the load meets the meat.

That is, unless you are of sufficient "rank" to not have to worry about such trivialities.

534 posted on 02/12/2006 3:07:42 PM PST by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]


To: Don Joe
That is, unless you are of sufficient "rank" to not have to worry about such trivialities.

It doesn't seem, from the story, that the Vice-President is trying to shirk responsibility for the shooting.

576 posted on 02/12/2006 3:32:05 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]

To: Don Joe
You seem really exercised about Cheney "pulling rank."

This isn't a rank issue. It happens. It's probably just an accident. And it has absolutely nothing to do with your traffic accident, you can't analogize to brake lights or rear-end collisions. Customs and practices in the field are not Uniform Rules of the Road, and there isn't any legal liability issue here.

618 posted on 02/12/2006 3:56:59 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson