This isn't a rank issue. It happens. It's probably just an accident. And it has absolutely nothing to do with your traffic accident, you can't analogize to brake lights or rear-end collisions. Customs and practices in the field are not Uniform Rules of the Road, and there isn't any legal liability issue here.
No, I merely observed a political reality. YOU seem "really exercized" about me pointing out the obvious.
This isn't a rank issue.
Sez you. Rather unconvincingly, I might point out. You can try repeating it a few more times, but I doubt that will do the trick. :)
It happens.
Wow. "It happens" is now an affirmative defense to a negligent gunshot injury? Kowabonga!
The list of "it happens" things is endless. I find your novel defense theory to be quite... amusing.
It's probably just an accident.
LOL!
Oh, THAT makes it all OK then. It was an accident!
Just out of curiosity, can you deconstruct the phrase "Negligent Discharge", and tell me the meaning of the first word, in the context of that phrase, and what relationship it has to real-life events featuring two humans, a firearm a bullet, and an impact?
And it has absolutely nothing to do with your traffic accident, you can't analogize to brake lights or rear-end collisions. Customs and practices in the field are not Uniform Rules of the Road, and there isn't any legal liability issue here.
Oh, this is rich. You can SHOOT someone, and as long as you were "merely" negligent, it's no-harm, no-foul, NO LEGAL LIABILITY ISSUE???
Good Lord, you ARE saying that! You said EXACTLY that!
Please do your "hunting" far away from "me and mine", OK? Your grasp of firearms safety issues and lack of any comprehension of the potential for LIABILITY if you "have an accident" that kills me, add up to what can only be construed as a menace!