Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Probe of domestic eavesdropping leak expands-Times
Reuters ^ | 2-11-06

Posted on 02/11/2006 5:02:08 PM PST by Indy Pendance

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Federal agents have interviewed officials at several law enforcement and national security agencies in a criminal investigation into The New York Times' disclosure of a U.S. domestic eavesdropping program, the newspaper reported.

In a story posted to its Web site to appear in its Sunday editions, The Times said the investigation was focused on circumstances surrounding its disclosure late last year of the highly classified program.

Officials and others interviewed by the Times said the investigation seemed to lay the groundwork for a grand jury inquiry and possible criminal charges, the Times said.

Many described the investigation as aggressive and fast moving, with the initial focus on identifying government officials who have had contacts with Times reporters, particularly those in the newspaper's Washington bureau.

It said an FBI team had questioned employees at the FBI, the National Security Agency, the Justice Department, the CIA and the office of the Director of National Intelligence, and that prosecutors had taken steps to activate a grand jury.

President George W. Bush has condemned the leak as a "shameful act" and CIA Director Porter Goss told a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on February 2:

"It is my aim, and it is my hope that we will witness a grand jury investigation with reporters present being asked to reveal who is leaking this information."

The Times characterized the case as one that pits the government, for which "the investigation represents an effort to punish those responsible for a serious security breach" and news outlets, for which the inquiry threatens confidentiality of sources "and the ability to report on controversial national security issues free of government interference."

The newspaper's executive editor, Bill Keller, said no one at the paper had been contacted in connection with the investigation, and defended the Times' reporting on the story.

"What our reporting has done is set off an intense national debate about the proper balance between security and liberty," Keller said in the story.

Civil liberties groups, Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans have called for an inquiry into the eavesdropping program, saying it appears to have circumvented the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which requires court approval for eavesdropping on U.S. citizens.

Former Vice President Al Gore has called for a special prosecutor to investigate the government's use of the program, and Michigan Democratic Rep. John Conyers Jr. has said the eavesdropping effort might amount to an impeachable offense.

Among statutes being reviewed by Justice Department investigators are espionage laws that prohibit the disclosure, dissemination or publication of national security information, the Times said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: doj; dojprobe; jamesrisen; leaks; nsa; nyt; spying; surveillance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Alberta's Child
How could the existence of the program be considered classified? That is a good question but I can explain, if a "source" works in the NSA or other agency related to the program and has information of the classified program, no matter how much in the public eye it already is, that source can not disclose anything about it's existence until of which time the program becomes declassified, period. There are exceptions but not the people I'm talking about. A lot of the political posturing right now is because people are scared and want this program declassified to give the leaker's some cover.
21 posted on 02/12/2006 5:07:09 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57
The problem is that that there is always far more leakage of classified information from within administrations (Democratic and Republican alike) than from outside them - Lewis Libby's claims that that he had been "authorized" to disclose classified information to journalists is a good example – and once you get such investigations rolling it’s going to be very difficult to control the directions thay take.
22 posted on 02/12/2006 7:30:13 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros at the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
If I were a Canadian, you might have a point.

See #13. Anyone who thinks the NY Times is any kind of legal trouble over this is really reaching. The Times is going to escape any criminal prosecution in this case for the same reason Scooter Libby wasn't indicted for "leaking" Valerie Plame's identity to the press.

23 posted on 02/12/2006 10:57:19 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother

That's my point . . . the program itself is NOT classified. The identities of certain targets of the program may be, but from what I understand the NY Times did not name any targets of ongoing "secret" surveillance by the NSA.


24 posted on 02/12/2006 10:59:25 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

This is an "I'm-going-to-steal-that-line", bump


25 posted on 02/12/2006 3:43:28 PM PST by Boot Hill ("...and Joshua went unto him and said: art thou for us, or for our adversaries?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson