Skip to comments.
Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar
suntimes ^
| February 11, 2006
Posted on 02/11/2006 4:11:34 PM PST by Revel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 661-663 next last
To: Revel
It would be one thing if he was selling it. But this is just crazy. lazy reporting....no mention if he has past occurences of getting in trouble.
To: BlazingArizona
"But how is it that possession of sugar, or any of the various other foods that look like dope, becomes a felony?" See my post #53.
To: Revel
The district issued a written statement, which said: "The dangers of illegal drugs and controlled substances are clear. The dangers of river-rock dumb adults in charge of minor children are now even MORE clear.
63
posted on
02/11/2006 5:51:19 PM PST
by
TLI
(ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA, Minuteman Project AZ Day -1 to Day 8, Texas Minutemen El Paso, 32 Days)
To: robertpaulsen
"It is unlawful for any person knowingly to possess a look‑alike substance. Any person who violates this subsection (c) is guilty of a petty offense. Any person convicted of a subsequent offense under this subsection (c) shall be guilty of a Class C misdemeanor."
Well, then everybody had better get rid of their powdered sugar, oregano, lawn clippings etc. or better yet get rid of this stupid government and the paranoid freaks who elected it. Maybe it should take a 4/5 vote to pass new laws. That would take it out of the hands of the dumbest 80%.
64
posted on
02/11/2006 5:57:00 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: robertpaulsen
I guess all the pastry chefs in the state are in BIG trouble.
65
posted on
02/11/2006 6:00:10 PM PST
by
Politicalmom
(Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
To: robertpaulsen
The best time for arguing in favor of breathing is before it becomes school policy, not after you violate it. This way, you see, you have more credibility.Absolutely amazing. Sorry I asked.
To: robertpaulsen
We saw it. We just didn't believe it. Perfect opportunity for contempt of court, legislature, governor and law in general.
67
posted on
02/11/2006 6:01:56 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: Revel
yup. kids are silly.
My son took sugar to school in ziploc baggies to "eat" for lunch. He was about 13 and did it to be a dufus.
One day the "baggie" fell out of his book bag in class and he almost got the same rap as this kid. Luckily the vice principal had some sense...believed his story...gave him a stern talking to and called his parents...we discussed what COULD have happened.
He's 15 1/2 now and still does stooopid stuff....he thinks about consequences about 10% of the time - we're making progress.
68
posted on
02/11/2006 6:03:13 PM PST
by
MudPuppy
(Another Day ~ Another Adventure!)
To: robertpaulsen
then they should ban water because it looks like vodka.
and cola looks a little too much like scotch.
i'm not saying that powdered sugar doesn't look like coke (i don't know if it does or not.) i'm saying that the term "look-alike drug" is pretty broad and pretty meaningless.
if a student says to another student (who is drinking water), "that looks like vodka", should the second student be arrested?
is the illegal substance something that looks like a drug, or something that someone says is a drug, or what? the quotation from the handbook did not make this clear.
69
posted on
02/11/2006 6:09:43 PM PST
by
drhogan
To: Born Conservative; DaveLoneRanger; 2Jedismom; StarCMC; Coleus; Tired of Taxes; KylaStarr; Cindy; ...
Could get probation "Look-alike drugs and substances can cause that same level of danger because staff and students are not equipped to differentiate between the two."
The school handbook states that students can be suspended or expelled for carrying a look-alike drug.
Now, let me add to what these charges could be for. Yes, I pinged my Agri list too. This school lunch program iniative is from the same program NAIS is and the money is being funneled through the USDA.
There is now a program being filtered into our governmental offices called Healthy People 2010. One of the focuses of this program is Mandatory School Lunch Program.
Whether we like the school lunches or not, it is not for the NGOs/UN to be throwing money at this problem and applying their terms and conditions with agents sent in for auditing.
The Mandatory School Lunch program makes sugar type foods illegal and enforcable to the full extent of the law.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563271/posts Healthy People 2010
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1561077/posts Animal Tagging and SCHOOL LUNCHES???
70
posted on
02/11/2006 6:10:30 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: robertpaulsen
Every grocery store in the state which sells powdered sugar is in violation of this law. Why aren't all the grocery store owners locked up as felons?
To: robertpaulsen
A look-like drug is a drug.
A drug look-alike is a non-drug that looks like a drug.
The policy as quoted said no look-alike drugs.
To: robertpaulsen
It's unlawful to sell powdered sugar?
To: Revel; Calpernia
added zero tolerance to the keywords.
damn,we used to make gun powder in chemistry class. i guess if we did that today i would be in jail. we used to play with mercury too which is taboo today.
74
posted on
02/11/2006 6:14:42 PM PST
by
Coleus
(IMHO, The IVF procedure is immoral & kills many embryos/children and should be outlawed)
To: robertpaulsen
so it is illegal to possess powdered sugar? why aren't they arresting all the bakers?
75
posted on
02/11/2006 6:14:54 PM PST
by
drhogan
To: robertpaulsen
Thanks. Sounds like the drug equivalent of 'hate crimes'.
Too bad there isn't a statute making it a felony for a politician to impersonate or attempt to impersonate a person with a brain.
76
posted on
02/11/2006 6:17:00 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Mad-Mo! Allah bin Satan commands ye: Bow to him 5 times/day: Head down, @ss-up, and fart at Heaven!)
To: Coleus
These privacy issues are getting scary too.
The schools aren't even obliged to comment to parents on many issues.
Yet, when they sign on for these NGO funded programs, they sign a Freedom of Information Act release.
So the United Nations gets any data they want.
77
posted on
02/11/2006 6:17:19 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Revel
Could get probation "Look-alike drugs and substances can cause that same level of danger because staff and students are not equipped to differentiate between the two."
Someone calling cocaine sugar could cause damage, but not vice versa. These folks at school are the epitome of morons.
78
posted on
02/11/2006 6:17:33 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: ApplegateRanch
Then we'd have to lock up nearly all of Congress if that were the law.
To: muawiyah
We are truly in trouble if our teachers and school administrators are too stupid to tell the difference between cocaine and sugar. Worse than 'trouble' here. . .truly frightening the mentality of the Educational 'collective' here; and their determination to criminalize a misunderstanding. . .not theirs, of course. . .but rather, the child's.
80
posted on
02/11/2006 6:18:08 PM PST
by
cricket
( a)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 661-663 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson