Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: new yorker 77

all the lawyer is saying is that he did not tell the court or special counsel that they'd use a "following orders" defense. he's not saying such a defense will not be used. he's not saying it will be used either.

no lawyer in his right mind is going to telegraph his trial strategy a year in advance of the trial.


4 posted on 02/10/2006 3:09:41 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: iPod Shuffle
Earth to you.

The article being printed falsely dictate that Libby's lawyers have told the prosecutor that they will defend Libby by saying that he revealed the name of Plame as directed by authorities.

That is a LIE.

His lawyers have said so.

Yet the lib media refuses to report it.

Why is that?
6 posted on 02/10/2006 3:12:17 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle
all the lawyer is saying is that he did not tell the court or special counsel that they'd use a "following orders" defense. he's not saying such a defense will not be used.

I agree. That's the only way to interpret the article.

14 posted on 02/10/2006 3:27:55 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Torie; AntiGuv

ping


33 posted on 02/10/2006 4:17:38 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson