To: iPod Shuffle
Earth to you.
The article being printed falsely dictate that Libby's lawyers have told the prosecutor that they will defend Libby by saying that he revealed the name of Plame as directed by authorities.
That is a LIE.
His lawyers have said so.
Yet the lib media refuses to report it.
Why is that?
6 posted on
02/10/2006 3:12:17 PM PST by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
Don't argue anything about MSM or the lying liberals. They are not worth the breath, they are burying themselves every day by them selves.
12 posted on
02/10/2006 3:24:08 PM PST by
buck61
(luv6060)
To: new yorker 77
The reason for the lie being that the AP continues to try and spin the Libby indictment as having to do with Valerie Plame's covert status (on which Fitzgerald has still not made a determination). The charges against Libby do no deal with Plame's covert status, so whether or not Libby was acting on the President's or Vice-President's orders to disclose Plame's employment is irrelevant to his defense. Only if Libby was claiming that he was told to lie to the grand jury would it be relevant.
To: new yorker 77
I even seen FOX reporting this today on one show.
42 posted on
02/11/2006 1:55:35 PM PST by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson