Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: new yorker 77

The reason for the lie being that the AP continues to try and spin the Libby indictment as having to do with Valerie Plame's covert status (on which Fitzgerald has still not made a determination). The charges against Libby do no deal with Plame's covert status, so whether or not Libby was acting on the President's or Vice-President's orders to disclose Plame's employment is irrelevant to his defense. Only if Libby was claiming that he was told to lie to the grand jury would it be relevant.


18 posted on 02/10/2006 3:41:14 PM PST by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: MarcusTulliusCicero
The charges against Libby do no deal with Plame's covert status, so whether or not Libby was acting on the President's or Vice-President's orders to disclose Plame's employment is irrelevant to his defense.
Excellent point.

27 posted on 02/10/2006 3:53:39 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson