Posted on 02/10/2006 10:18:17 AM PST by SirLinksalot
as to seeing a UFO, so one account seems to have little value scientifically. It can not be reproducibly observed by independent observers.
Hey, the nerlings were real enough!!! I can prove it!! I have their fingerprints on the Reese's Pieces.
but David was so BIG, I never had a chance. Yeah right.
Gotta sling the right song. Actually, give Goliath so drugs. Then he's more apt to get stoned.
Is that your proof intelligent design?
I didn't know his name was intelligent design.
Him to another--"Please, DO try and keep up with the adults. If you don't try, you'll never grow up."
Heck I like it better that way.
Get enough of these replicators to band together and you have the beginnings of a metabolism and "life".
They were a formidable foe to the Goa 'ulds.
Evolution is the hairbrained theory of a disgruntled Theology student with NO solid evidentiary support.
Believing in Evolution is much more a leap of pure Faith than is believing in God and His Son, Jesus... whose proof is everywhere you look.
;-/
If evolution didn't do it, I can't think of any other cause!
I believe there are certain aspects of evolution that are true--even ID necessitates that. I do believe that something was behind it all though. I can't explain it or "prove" it, but I can believe it. I do believe that there were dinosaurs and other fossil life forms, but to what effect it "all" happened I don't know and "how" it happened I don't know exactly. But I'm comfortable with that. It's the "future" that counts more anyways.
I can't think of any other cause!
We homeful hoboes need help. How about that cause?
Perhaps you could explain what is wrong with the theory of evolution rather than just making empty assertions.
Since I'm not on the Baal, maybe I'll take another Loki at the situation. Maybe it could be someone Hera or O-Thor one. Maybe Isis just anyone, by Jupiter.
ather than just making empty assertions.
What if they were full?
Thanks for the explanation.
But, as it is, the assertion was completely empty, devoid of any evidence or rationality.
It was a "designed" response.
How does one even begin to talk with someone who says such things as the above?
As the saying goes "Never argue with a crazy person". My advice is to just let 666 talk to himself.
And just when I thought I was going to get some credit arond here, you had to throw in that last sentence. Thanks for nothing!!!!!!
Wow. That whole posting is taken staight from the Creationism Handbook of Catch Phrases.
That was your implication with this scintillating statement...
Uhhh - nope, that implication was merely your assumption. And what is more amazing, when I corrected you, you make the same mistake - of assuming again. I hope you realize that in a given situation there is often other explanations beyond your original assumption (thus my pointing out your need to get outside the box).
So would you like a final try? I'll give you 2 hints.
1. I have a high regard for pharmaceuticals (so..not a Scientologist).
2. Try re-reading your post #20.
And if you've lost track, my original point it was in reply to your post #20:
"The most ignorant statement made at FR today."
Hopefully this helps...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.