Some people are saying that the boy must have felt homosexual tendencies before the seminar, or he wouldn't have been interested in attending in the first place.
I swear, you people keep acting as if this notion that goofy awkward boys cant be led into this sort of thing. You scream like it is not plausible in the least.
When you were a goofy awkward boy, could someone have led you into this sort of thing? Did anyone?
Get an Effin clue!
Do you think using faux profanity gives your point more credibility, or is that the only way you know to express yourself?
What are you saying?
When you were a goofy awkward boy, could someone have led you into this sort of thing? Did anyone?
The question is moot. First -you ignore the fact that parents and not the state decide what their children are exposed to -especially when it comes to morality -this so that you can posit your so what -what is the problem argument... Do you understand the fact that our laws recognize children as children -not as mature adults able to fend for themselves and enter into contracts etcetera... The fact that you may be willing to sacrifice children of your own in such a manner and further advocate others into making such a sacrifice for the village of liberal utopia you imagine is really not noteworthy nor relevant to this discussion which primarily entails opposing the homosexualization of society...
If you wish to turn a blind eye to this stuff then do it elsewhere...
Maybe a nice morally liberal forum would be best for you to express your liberal thoughts on?
Gay bogeymen don't haunt my dreams either.
I was raised a Catholic, have a cousin who is gay and I love her dearly. Several friends at my Catholic college realized that they were gay after years of deluding themselves in heterosexual relationships, engagement and marriage. I don't care what the science says, it was NOT a choice for any of the numerous gay people that I know, many of whom are devoted sole caretakers for aging parents and friends whose "heterosexual" families are too busy for them.
I also believe that our President has stated publicly that he believes that homosexuality is not a choice, based on the compassionate comments that he made during the twisted media flap over Dick Cheney's daughter.
Are Camille Paglia, Andrew Sullivan and the Log Cabin Republicans all part of the "Gay Agenda"?
Do heterosexuals not engage in sodomy, pedophilia and sexual acts that are considered sinful?
Zot me all you want, I don't give a rat's !#$%.
People are gay- it's a fact of life and has always been.
doesnt matter, the fact is that a seminar of this sort could persuade one into homosexuality, it definintely glorifies it.
When you were a goofy awkward boy, could someone have led you into this sort of thing? Did anyone?
Not likely. But again, that is not the issue. I have yet to read someone that claimed that every person could be led to this behavior and I also did not make that claim. All I stated was that it is completely rational that someone could be led into it. It happens all the time in many different areas. My own history has no bearing on the fact that children are impressionable and people could be ushered into this lifestyle.
Do you think using faux profanity gives your point more credibility, or is that the only way you know to express yourself?
It doesnt lend credibility, what it does is illustrate my frustration with the likes of you and your buddies on this board. Obviously its not the only way I know how to express myself because my previous posts have been essentialy void of such "faux profanity." I (and others) have presented evidence and plausible circumstances to verify my (our) points, while you and your friends who prefer to look away from facts and evidence and instead ask me if I'm gay or my kids are or this or that, you have brought nothing to the table and are essentially just making most people read more than they have to. Stop wasting everyones time with the same ol same ol.