Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth About the Homosexual Rights Movement (Caution, graphic contents)
New Oxford Review ^ | February 9, 2006 | Ronald G. Lee

Posted on 02/09/2006 8:10:43 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last
To: r9etb
" They're completely wrapped up in trying to justify their actions."

In order to continue in that sort of behavior, don't you think one would have to go to great lengths to rationalize it? That's true regarding ANY bad behavior.

41 posted on 02/09/2006 10:21:24 AM PST by TAdams8591 (The first amendment does NOT protect vulgar and obscene speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Wow! What a powerful essay! God bless this man and his journey in faith.


42 posted on 02/09/2006 10:21:47 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

bump for later


43 posted on 02/09/2006 10:25:06 AM PST by Lacey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K; FormerLib; xzins
Thanks for the pings. It's long but well worth it.

I Do Exist
People Can Change
Research Shows Change is Real

A Parent's Guide to Preventing Homosexuality
How Might Homosexuality Develop? Putting the Pieces Together

Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links

44 posted on 02/09/2006 10:27:12 AM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
And it's not just homosexuals.

I uised to closely follow the arguments for the ordination of women to the priesthood in the Catholic Church. Like with the gays, there are a lot of bright, verbally agile advocates out there: there was a lot of fancy Biblical exegesis, and a lot of historical digging, reassembling, reassessing, reconfiguring.

Then one day, I heard a feminist nun give a supposedly Scriptural pro-women-priesthood talk. Another nun, sitting next to me in the audience, grinned and whispered to me, "That's what I love about Sr. Virginia Ann. She makes it all sound so plausible.

A little shock went through me when I realized that she herself didn't think it was true, and didn't even care whether it was true: it was enough, for her, that it was "plausible."

I think that it all goes back to an epistomological assumption, that there IS no Good or Evil, Right or Wrong, True or False: all there is is a struggle for power.

45 posted on 02/09/2006 10:27:48 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("What is truth?" Pontius Pilate, Postmodern Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SirKit

This is a powerful essay!


46 posted on 02/09/2006 10:30:41 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John O
Yes but how many on the side have they had.

No idea. I don't ask, he doesn't offer. I get the impression, though, that since my boss is 50 and his partner 60, they aren't out in the bars much and are pretty much happy homebodies at this point. Mostly I hear what Netflix DVD they watched that night.

47 posted on 02/09/2006 10:30:59 AM PST by Heyworth ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad
"It is a choice, not a genetic trait"

When did the genome project determine that nobody is born that way? I am sure it is BOTH and more than likely for those that it is a choice they are the most vocal.

To me, the cause of the predisposition does not matter. Acting on those desires violates just about any norm you can think of. We all have desires, however, being intelligent humans we do not act on the ones that society frowns upon.

I, for one, would like to exterminate a certain group of excrement claiming to have a religion that is offended by everything. I have not acted on that burning desire. Why can't the butt pirates keep it in their pants?

48 posted on 02/09/2006 10:34:38 AM PST by Wurlitzer (The difference between democrats and terrorists is the terrorists don't claim to support the troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer

bump


49 posted on 02/09/2006 10:34:56 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

Quite the reverse...what's called homophobia is now considered to be a mental illness.


50 posted on 02/09/2006 10:38:16 AM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Of course, he speaks from many years of experience. Is your cynicism as well founded?


51 posted on 02/09/2006 10:40:43 AM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Because rump rangers are not responsible for their own behavior and we need to give them entitlements.


52 posted on 02/09/2006 10:44:20 AM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
I agree with a great deal of what you said. The gay men I knew 20 years ago are all now either celibate or dead. And those who used to be almost euphorically "pro-gay" now seem shriveled, sad and disappointed.

The part I don't agree with is your idea that it's a sin for even a husband and wife to have sex if they're not trying to make a baby.

This is not, and never has been the teaching of the Catholic Church (though there were douibtless some Jansenistic Irish priests and nuns who said so.) At the very least, marital intercourse was always seen as a "remedy for concupiscence" ("It is better to marry than to burn" --- St. Paul) and as an act expressing the unitive (bonding and belonging) meaning of marriage.

Pope John Paul II went a lot farther than that in discussing the mutual self-giving of marital sexuality as an image of Divine love --- whether or not the couple are physically capable of pregnancy.

And I think Pope John Paul was right. There's a depth of meaning there, for those who are spiritually able to discern it.

53 posted on 02/09/2006 10:48:12 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Make love. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
In order to continue in that sort of behavior, don't you think one would have to go to great lengths to rationalize it? That's true regarding ANY bad behavior.

Sure. The question is whether it's necessary to explain a place like Lobo's as the result of a conscious conspiracy, as Mr. Lee's article depicts it to be.

Delusion is enough to explain the place -- there's no need to assume it's actually a front organization for a larger conspiracy.

54 posted on 02/09/2006 10:49:25 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

No, I just don't fool so easily. ;-)


55 posted on 02/09/2006 10:49:32 AM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

And this guy is absolutely correct when he talks about the homosexual activists can count on the support of anyone who prefers to be outside of Judeo-Christian sexual morality.

If the Church can be forced to sanction homosexual couplings, how could it ever condemn fornication or even adultery?


56 posted on 02/09/2006 10:51:49 AM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

The rest of us need to change that.

It was modified wrongly, and it can be corrected.

I, too, believe and quite completely that homosexuality is a mental illness and a spiritual evil. And that it requires that the rest of us respond with helps to reduce and solve the problems, not efforts to enable and "encourage the disease" so to speak.

This man's testimony is remarkably sane. Quite a tortured route he has had, but he is, thanks be to God, over that now.


57 posted on 02/09/2006 10:59:26 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; TAdams8591
It's clearly more of a fraud that it is a conspiracy.

It anyone ever attempted to shut down the place because of the homosexual porn, they'd be confronted at the door by a group of homosexuals and homosexual cheerleaders shaking their copies of Walt Whitman and wailing to the assembled media that this is what those mad "homophobes" were really trying to ban.

And the media would lap it up like dogs and report many stories about "homophobes" being delusional and rambling about conspiracies. Yes, leftists have a limited bag of tricks in these things.

It's all about maintain a facade of plausible deniability because the public would never tolerate their true nature.
58 posted on 02/09/2006 10:59:39 AM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
Of course, he speaks from many years of experience. Is your cynicism as well founded?

First, I'd say that my take on the matter is well-founded, based on numerous discussions I've had. I'm not a homosexual, so I cannot claim to have looked at it from anything other than a heterosexual perspective; nevertheless (or perhaps precisely because of that) everything I've seen points to delusion and rationalization as the driving factor.

None of this is to deny the existence of a homosexual agenda -- it's quite obviously there.

Where I take issue with this article is in Mr. Lee's claim that places like Lobo's are actually "fronts" for an active conspiracy. That's just plain silly, and also unnecessary. Delusion and rationalization are sufficient to explain it.

59 posted on 02/09/2006 11:00:32 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

This was a very long piece and it never really strayed from its central theme that sex itself, the act, the chase, the culmination, the "afterglow", were the driving forces for the author and all those he personally encountered along his way.

Now, when he seems to feel that his journey has reached a point at which he may at least rest, he sets off again, this time in print, chaste and chastened but still fervid in his opinion that there must be passion to fuel his trip to make it worthwhile.

So, in his newfound passion to mend old fences and build new bridges, he careers back along his wrecked path, righteous and indignant at the same time, flinging the bits and scraps of his past behind him in the vain hope the road itself can be set right and made ready for the next traveler with a firmer foot.

The trouble is, the passion consumes him; there is no place for him to rest, one day he will simply stop searching, for his own feet will carry him no further.


60 posted on 02/09/2006 11:01:37 AM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson