No, I just don't fool so easily. ;-)
If you take Mr. Lee's article at face value, perhaps you should reconsider your claim....
I'm quite serious about this: Mr. Lee is essentially claiming that the likes of ex-Father O'Neill is an agent of a conspiracy. But is that really necessary?
Mr. Lee's article contains some very useful descriptions of the power of delusion, desire, and rationalization. He should have left it at that, as it's a sufficient explanation.
When he tries to build it into something more than that, I begin to distrust him. Seriously: do you really believe that the owners of Lobo's would spend scads of money on fake stock, just to lure homos to the pornography in back? Pshaw. There's no need to assume it.