1 posted on
02/08/2006 2:29:53 PM PST by
weegee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: weegee
If this guy's company is getting paid by our government, there's something amiss.
To: weegee
Um...correct me if I'm wrong but weren't the cartoons published in the WEST, not the ISLAMIC WORLD?
3 posted on
02/08/2006 2:32:25 PM PST by
Lekker 1
("Computers in the future may have only 1000 vacuum tubes..." - Popular Mechanics, March 1949)
To: weegee
Muslims make a point of not insulting Christians about their faith. I guess beheading the infidels doesn't count as "insulting".
4 posted on
02/08/2006 2:32:28 PM PST by
Argus
To: weegee
In a world that is more of a global village than ever before, there must be compromises. Muslims make a point of not insulting Christians about their faith. But, bash Jews every chance they get.
5 posted on
02/08/2006 2:33:20 PM PST by
Nachum
To: weegee
The West does not care about the state of culture in the ME, so long as the oil can be produced. Columbus was trying to find an alternate route to Indian and China so shipping didn't have to go through the ME. Nobody wanted to ship through the ME. Still don't.
6 posted on
02/08/2006 2:33:49 PM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: weegee
"In a world that is more of a global village than ever before, there must be compromises. Muslims make a point of not insulting Christians about their faith."
? ? ? ? ?
What global village is missing this idiot?
To: weegee
"Muslims make a point of not insulting Christians about their faith. "
Broke my BS meter.
No mention of the Jews I note.
8 posted on
02/08/2006 2:34:31 PM PST by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: weegee
...West's absolutes have limits in Islamic world Hey, Einstein, you're missing the point. The problem is that Islamic absolutes are not limits on the West. At least they weren't until the MSM was taken over by cowards and hypocrites.
(steely)
In the West, freedom of expression is considered sacred. For some, that freedom is absolute, even allowing someone to insult a person's faith. In Muslim countries, there are equally absolute standards regarding Islam, and there, nothing and no one is above Islam, and love and respect for the Prophet are requirements for adherents to the Muslim faith.
In Islamic nations, nothing is above Islam, other faiths are beneath Islam (in respect and civil rights), and everyone must have love and respect for "THE Prophet" even if you are not an adherent to the Muslim faith. Supremacist belief system at its finest.
To me, your sacred prophet is just another Antichrist figure leading the flock astray.
10 posted on
02/08/2006 2:34:37 PM PST by
weegee
(We are all Danes now.)
To: weegee
Muslims make a point of not insulting Christians about their faithUh, blatantly false!
Virtually every week newspapers throughout the Muslim world run stories and cartoons, nasty, disgusting cartoons, about Christians and Jews.
These are also printed in books, taught to school children, etc.
This author is making excuses for barbaric behaviour.
12 posted on
02/08/2006 2:36:39 PM PST by
technomage
(NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
To: weegee
His whole premise, that in the West freedom of speech is an absolute, is wrong. Even here in the US where freedom of speech is still being fought for more successfully than some other areas in the Western world, we put limits on speech such as the much trotted out "can't yell fire in a crowded theatre."
13 posted on
02/08/2006 2:37:17 PM PST by
Bahbah
(An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
To: weegee
In Muslim countries, there are equally absolute standards regarding Islam, and there, nothing and no one is above Islam, and love and respect for the Prophet are requirements for adherents to the Muslim faith.Bully for them. Move back there if that is so important to you.
Otherwise, realize the absolute fallocy of expressing views in an American newspaper that freedom of speech is subservient to your religion.
14 posted on
02/08/2006 2:37:40 PM PST by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: weegee
Fundamentalist Islamic fascism is not the global yard stick by which those in free societies measure their liberty.
16 posted on
02/08/2006 2:38:19 PM PST by
Hexenhammer
( Oregon: She dies by her own prescriptions)
To: weegee
Where have all these apologists for violent Muslim reaction to CARTOONS,for pete's sake,been when Christian icons have been insulted and Christians offended? Oh that's right,offended Christians will at most boycott their commie papers-they probably don't subscribe in the first place-they certainly won't burn buildings and decapitate people. So the apologists are on solid safe ground when Christians or Jews are offended. Now all of a sudden they're defending a concept that has heretofore been foreign to them-with freedom comes responsibility. Because they're SCARED. What a lot of two-faced hypocritical cowards.
17 posted on
02/08/2006 2:38:24 PM PST by
mrsmel
(Men possess talent. Genius possesses men.)
To: weegee
In Muslim countries, there are equally absolute standards regarding Islam, and there, nothing and no one is above Islam, and love and respect for the Prophet are requirements for adherents to the Muslim faith everyone. The difference is that in muslim countries, if anyone disagrees the muslims threaten, intimidate or murder them. That's more than a subtle difference.
18 posted on
02/08/2006 2:38:44 PM PST by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: weegee
"To most Muslims, the West appears content about the state of backwardness, obscurantism and darkness that currently prevails in Muslim countries in the Middle East and elsewhere. And along comes bin Laden, who voices anger over the state of affairs in the world of Islam. People do not necessarily buy into his murderous philosophy of transnational terrorism, but they agree with his criticism of what is wrong with the world of Islam and why it remains backward."
This clown is a groveling, sniveling apologist for terrorism, period. He should not be receiving any US government money, and he should not be accorded the slightest respect by anyone who is not also an apologist for Bin Laden. Does any sane, rational person think that Bin Laden's movement is about making the world of Islamo-fascists any less "backward" when their most fervent hopes and goals are all about going back to medieval Sharia and a worldwide "Caliphate"?????? This author is a nutcase....
19 posted on
02/08/2006 2:38:58 PM PST by
Enchante
(Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
To: weegee
So how to end the confrontation? Sooner or later the Muslims (if allowed) will attack the west with WMD and will be defeated by massive retaliation.
20 posted on
02/08/2006 2:39:31 PM PST by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: weegee
Newsflash: Islamofacists will find the motivation to riot, rape, kill and pillage on a cereal box. Anybody who thinks otherwise is stupid and dangerous.
22 posted on
02/08/2006 2:39:42 PM PST by
msnimje
(SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
To: weegee
"To most Muslims, the West appears content about the state of backwardness, obscurantism and darkness that currently prevails in Muslim countries in the Middle East and elsewhere."An obvious lie.
Why does Texas put up with the Houston Canker?
Most people aren't aware of this, but Philip Anschutz has already pre-bought most of the Top-50 markets viz www. ___________examiner.com; he needs to get the Examiner rolling in Houston post-haste.
23 posted on
02/08/2006 2:40:35 PM PST by
StAnDeliver
(Move over Nostradamus, make room for StAnDeliveramus)
To: weegee
"Muslims make a point of not insulting Christians about their faith. "Except that if we don't convert to their devil "god" we should be killed.
Does this moron think he can spout this cr*p and we'll nod our heads in agreement?
24 posted on
02/08/2006 2:41:03 PM PST by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson