Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Winston Churchills' view of Islam
Sir Winston Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 (London: Longmans, Green | 1899 | Winston Churchill

Posted on 02/08/2006 9:21:18 AM PST by johnsmith2447

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: churchill; churchillislam; islam; muslim; rop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: johnsmith2447
"and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall"
In all fairness, it looks like Churchill didn't think much of creationists, either.
21 posted on 02/08/2006 9:35:56 AM PST by afz400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnsmith2447

Ah, to long for the days when men could speak honestly.


22 posted on 02/08/2006 9:36:11 AM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies; Fred Nerks; jan in Colorado

hydrophobia-in-a-dog PING.


23 posted on 02/08/2006 9:37:17 AM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnsmith2447
"and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live."

Great gift for the language. I don't think I've ever read a more polite way of calling somebody a thief.

24 posted on 02/08/2006 9:38:12 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnsmith2447
Winston Churchill saw it then, yet our leaders democRAT movers and shakers do not see it now.

There...it's all fixed now.

25 posted on 02/08/2006 9:38:12 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

B.P.C. LOL

Here's more:

http://www.twainquotes.com/Religion.html


26 posted on 02/08/2006 9:39:00 AM PST by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: travlnmn41

England and English institutions even then were fullof Arabists. WC spoke against the received wisdom.


27 posted on 02/08/2006 9:39:10 AM PST by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kenth
You make it sound as if he ranks high enough to be amongst their ranks, when he is the standard by which most others should be measured

Hey, hey, hey, cool your jets.

I WASN'T implying that Winston Churchill was less than Presidents Reagan or Bush.

I was saying that His Conservative Morals & Rock-solid Indomitability would have earned him as much critiscism & vitirol that oru Consrvative Presidents have.

And I fully agree with what Churchill said & wrote; I don't follow the "Religion of Peace" mantra but I'm praying that GOD THE FATHER will show President Bush the Right Way to go in these terrible times.

28 posted on 02/08/2006 9:40:11 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Winston Churchill was the greatest national leader of the 20th Century.

Agreed.FDR couldn't hold a candle to him.

29 posted on 02/08/2006 9:40:16 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: johnsmith2447

These are the comments of a 25 year old English aristocrat 105 years ago. What has changed? Technology hasn't helped them, Politics hasn't helped them, Allah hasn't helped them, nothing has changed because is can't change. The greatest claims against Christianity have come against the RELIGION of Christianity, not its Saviour, its message, or its truth. Religion is not of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, it is the attempt by man to coerce the truth and improve upon it in mans image...an altogether hopeless task.


30 posted on 02/08/2006 9:43:01 AM PST by mhuye (http://theonewhoislost.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
There...it's all fixed now.

It was more accurate before you changed it.

GWB called it a "religion of peace" and—in his latest SOTU address—a "noble faith."

31 posted on 02/08/2006 9:46:37 AM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero

LOL! I think arabs of the time would disagree with you as we had subjugated most of their nations into the British Empire. . .


32 posted on 02/08/2006 9:49:43 AM PST by albionvectis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

I wonder what, if anything, Teddy Roosevelt had to say about Islam.


33 posted on 02/08/2006 9:49:44 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: johnsmith2447

Great Quote. Bump.


34 posted on 02/08/2006 9:50:45 AM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnsmith2447

Great find.


35 posted on 02/08/2006 9:50:48 AM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Liberal Whisperer

The libs wouldn't survive a diversity conference in the Mid East after the religious police make the show.


36 posted on 02/08/2006 9:53:08 AM PST by 308MBR (If fools were objective in their viewpoints, they wouldn't be fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.


37 posted on 02/08/2006 9:53:49 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
They are using political correctness, gay rights, anti-Christian intellectualism as a tool.

B/c they are allowed to use them. Pure & simple. Rememeber, "You can't be a doormat unless you lie down first."

38 posted on 02/08/2006 9:56:54 AM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnsmith2447

BTTT!


39 posted on 02/08/2006 9:57:18 AM PST by Palpatine (Every single liberal is now an enemy of the republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

It may well be that they are more worried about Saudi oil supply continuity than voter views out in the hustings.

Perhaps it is time to admit we are under attack by Islamic whackos in a war they declared on the West.

Bomb 'em, neutron bomb 'em.

Then "All your oil fields are belong to us".\

The Liberals have been whining "It's all about oil." Let's make 'em right.


40 posted on 02/08/2006 9:58:40 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson