Dr. George Weinberg, a New York City psychologist and researcher, commented that the aversion to Brokeback Mountain is definitely homophobia. He said the film is the idea of one mans adoration for another. A love affair more deep and lasting and romantic than with their wives. He advised that those who are uneasy about the film first understand you have this problem. At least by acknowledging it, thats a start. Its like saying, I have a fear of heights.
So...if I don't want to pay $10 to watch two guys humping, I'm homophobic and don't love my wife enough. If I don't want to watch hetero porn, does that mean I am heterophobic and don't love my wife enough? Geez, these days some college degrees might as well be from a Crackerjack box. (Credit to my wife for pointing out the homo/heterophobic fallacy in this guy's already silly reasoning.)
There are links to further information at the source document.
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: 351 Cleveland; AFPhys; agenda_express; almcbean; ambrose; Amos the Prophet; AnalogReigns; ...
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
2 posted on
02/07/2006 8:29:05 AM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(GOP Blend Coffee--"Coffee for Conservative Taste!" Go to www.gopetc.com)
To: Mr. Silverback
...the whole manual reflects social context.
She's right you know. The DSM is a political document not a scientific one. Just another reason why these modern day witch-doctors and the poison potions they prescribe should be completely avoided.
To: Mr. Silverback
...prompting co-star Heath Ledger to claim the cancellations are akin to racism. He added: "I heard a while ago that
West Virginia was going to ban it. But
thats a state that was lynching people only 25 years ago, so thats to be expected. . . . Personally, I dont think the movie is [controversial] but I think maybe the Mormons in Utah do. I think its hilarious and very immature of a societyif two people are loving. I think we should be more concerned if two people express anger in love, than love."
I didn't realize lynching was such a big problem in 1980. Inspired by the election of Reagan no doubt.
5 posted on
02/07/2006 8:42:25 AM PST by
Sans-Culotte
(Meadows Place, TX-"Tom DeLay Country")
To: Mr. Silverback
The original research dealt with people who could not function in ordinary life, could not use the elevator, pick up a newspaper, or buy food because they feared it might have been contaminated by homosexuals. I would guess this to be a particular manifestation of OCD, rather than a disorder that had its origin in a fear of homosexuals.
They might want to rethink this, if we start claiming homophobia is a disability and they can't discriminate against homophobes.
Mrs VS
To: Mr. Silverback
Yep. Funny how the people that like to refer to themselves as "progressives" have such regressive ideas.
7 posted on
02/07/2006 8:50:30 AM PST by
Mulch
(tm)
To: Mr. Silverback; Clint N. Suhks
...from the bathhouse to the marriage altar.I've no doubt that most of them will promptly head from the marriage altar right back into the bathhouse for the Reception.
8 posted on
02/07/2006 8:52:34 AM PST by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Mr. Silverback
Well I think a person is at least morally corrupt -- in some cases also mentally ill -- if they are not repulsed by homosexuality. So there! Oh healthy conscience where art thou? No one seems to sport those these days.
9 posted on
02/07/2006 8:53:45 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Mr. Silverback
Liberalism is a mental disease.
10 posted on
02/07/2006 8:54:03 AM PST by
SwinneySwitch
(Liberals-beyond your expectations!)
To: MillerCreek
To: ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; arete; ...
According to a December 10, 2005, Washington Post article, Psychiatry Ponders Whether Extreme Bias Can Be an Illness, it seems there is a serious move afoot to formally designate those who are repulsed by homosexual practice as suffering from a pathological neurosishomophobia. In other words, a person who views the legitimization of homosexuality as sinful, immoral, or destructive to society may have a mental disorder!
That analysis was offered by a number of mental health professionals, including UCLA psychology professor Edward Dunbar, who equates so-called homophobia with racial bias and suggests the disorder should be included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Celebration of Diversity bump!
14 posted on
02/07/2006 9:00:49 AM PST by
A. Pole
(Joanne Senier-LaBarre: "We Wish You a Swinging Holiday!")
To: Mr. Silverback
If I have a mental illness, when does the government start sending me my check?
15 posted on
02/07/2006 9:00:52 AM PST by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: Mr. Silverback
Turned the tables, eh? Homosexuality has gone from being a mental disorder, to not wanting anything to do with it being a mental disorder.
Crazy.
17 posted on
02/07/2006 9:02:06 AM PST by
sandbar
To: Mr. Silverback
You know, we could make this work in our favor...If we are suffering from a mental illness, wouldn't we be entitled to compensation? I mean, they can't make us work for a livng if they decide we must all be sickos, can they?
(oh yeah, sarcasm off now)
18 posted on
02/07/2006 9:06:45 AM PST by
Desert_Girl
(A scar is what happens when the world is made flesh)
To: Mr. Silverback
>>>It does seem to be almost culturally universal that heterosexual men can have a deep repulsion to overt homosexuality, but there is no study I know of to ascertain whether this is a biologically based trait.>>>
MEN? I thought I was going to throw up when Liam Neesom unexpectedly frenched that guy in Kinsey. I keep asking people, ok, so we KNOW they were doing 'stuff' in Brokeback Mountain, is it AUDIBLE? When I heard it was I said, nope, that's it. I would be physically repulsed by hearing two guys going at it. And I'm a pretty openminded woman who doesn't care if two people are gay. I just don't want to hear it/see it. Doesn't make me homophobic, and don't really care if it does.
So all this time I've heard gays say "It makes us just as sick to see two hetero's going at it", does that mean they have this same disorder?
19 posted on
02/07/2006 9:06:53 AM PST by
sandbar
To: Mr. Silverback
20 posted on
02/07/2006 9:09:30 AM PST by
VOA
To: Mr. Silverback
Psychology is not a science.
To: Mr. Silverback
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
To: Mr. Silverback
They imagine people are going to do all kinds of bad things and hurt them, and feel they have to do something to protect themselves. When they reach that stage, they are very impaired. . . . They cant work and function; they cant hold a job. They would benefit from treatment of some type, particularly medication.
There is already a disorder in the DSM that this describes. It's called paranoia and it has nothing to do with homophobia!
To: Mr. Silverback
In reality it is not unusual, nor is it immoral, for a man to have a deep and affectionate bond with another man, but not the erotic relationship described by Dr. Weinberg. As a case in point, men often experience a sacrificial, moral love among comrades in arms, which is called agape love. The greatest example of such love was the sacrificial death of Jesus on the cross: For God so agapao the world, He gave His only begotten Son . . .
Homosexual activity has absolutely NO correlation to agape love!! Zip, Zilch, Nada.
26 posted on
02/07/2006 9:29:09 AM PST by
gidget7
(Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
To: Mr. Silverback
There is a sizable group who have a demonstrated bias against what they call breeders, and not all among this group are homosexual; there are scattered pockets (often in prisons, jails and inner-city neighborhoods) of those who have a professed distrust of white people generally and show this by disorderly behavior in the form of riots, looting and mayhem; there are honored and recognized groups who maintain that all men are pigs, regardless of race or ethnic identification; and then there are those whose very livelihood depends on the continued friction among the sexes, the races, the ethnics and the classes.
Who is immune?
28 posted on
02/07/2006 9:57:25 AM PST by
Old Professer
(Fix the problem, not the blame!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson