Skip to comments.
Poland's Leader Hopes to Gain From Support Of U.S. Policies-(Time to pay Poland)
Washington Post ^
| February 7, 2006
| Craig Whitlock
Posted on 02/07/2006 4:26:46 AM PST by Flavius
WARSAW -- Poland's new president, Lech Kaczynski, said his country might keep troops in Iraq until sometime in 2007 if necessary, in an extension of its military commitment there, even as other nations are withdrawing or making plans to do so.
In an interview in advance of a visit this week to Washington, where he is to meet President Bush and other U.S. officials, Kaczynski said Poland had no second thoughts about joining the multinational invasion and occupation of Iraq. He defended the removal of Saddam Hussein as "the right thing to do," despite the failure to find weapons of mass destruction and the continuing Iraqi insurgency.
At the same time, Kaczynski said he would look for reassurance from Washington that Poland's strong support of U.S. policy would be rewarded with military aid, increased trade and other benefits. Poland stands out in Europe as one of America's most reliable allies, although opinion surveys show that many Poles feel their backing of the United States has not paid off as much as they would like.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kaczynskivisit; poland
1
posted on
02/07/2006 4:26:48 AM PST
by
Flavius
To: Flavius
When will the world start paying us?
2
posted on
02/07/2006 4:30:06 AM PST
by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: Flavius
A July poll commissioned by the German Marshall Fund of the United States found that 52 percent of Poles approved of Bush's foreign policy -- by far the highest level in Europe and higher even than for Americans who were questioned in the same survey.
3
posted on
02/07/2006 4:30:11 AM PST
by
Tarkin
(Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito...one more to go)
To: mtbopfuyn
Don't you think it's better to give some military aid to a staunch ally that to send billions of dollars to countries that hate the United States? For a not-so-wealthy country like Poland the intervention in Iraq was a very hard choice not only politically but also financially. IMHO it's not a bad thing to reward allies, especially these allies which are much poorer than the US but nevertheless contribute to the common cause.
4
posted on
02/07/2006 4:42:50 AM PST
by
Tarkin
(Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito...one more to go)
To: Tarkin
I think $30 million for 1500 troops is pretty steep already.
5
posted on
02/07/2006 5:24:59 AM PST
by
ClaireSolt
(.)
To: ClaireSolt
***I think $30 million for 1500 troops is pretty steep already.***
$30 mil is peanuts in 'D.C. money' - 67% of the cost of that Bridge to Nowhere in Alaska ($45 mil).
6
posted on
02/07/2006 5:52:32 AM PST
by
Condor51
(Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
To: mtbopfuyn
Probably not until we quit whining, and probably not even then.
7
posted on
02/07/2006 5:56:17 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: lizol
8
posted on
02/07/2006 5:58:05 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: PzLdr; Camel Joe; BubbaTheRocketScientist; Tuxedo; Issaquahking; Matrix33; Loud Mime; okstate; ...
Eastern European ping list
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Eastern European ping list
9
posted on
02/07/2006 6:16:33 AM PST
by
lizol
To: ClaireSolt
What do you mean ? Too much ?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson