Posted on 02/06/2006 8:30:10 PM PST by CaliFReeper1
Nice work bro..Basically the Muslims are strong arming the public and mostly people are cowering and running scared. Be prepared for sever times ahead. we need to stop Islamics rom coming to the US YESTERDAY. I see here in the NYC area their population swelling by the day . The suburbs are loaded , the malls , everwhere. I dont trust them at all.
I think a little collective punishment is headed their way.
I just got home from Detroit
Locked the front door...Oh boy!
Since when did Motown turn into West Najaff?
Religion of peace comes in, who knows what they're bringing?
Chorus:Doo, doo, doo, sneakin’ through our back door.
Our cities have these lurkers, dirty nukes in burqas.
Look at all those Mooselimb people walking cross my lawn.
dynamite ayatollahs issue jihad fatwas
Chorus:Doo, doo, doo, sneakin’ through our back door.
Donkeys and the elephants don't seem to understand.
They just close their eyes, bunch of blind ol' fools
Doo, doo doo.
Harsh words of sedition called a "peaceful" religion.
Chorus:Doo, doo, doo, sneakin’ through our back door.
Donkeys and the elephants don't seem to understand.
They just close their eyes, bunch of blind ol' fools
Doo, doo doo.
Fight the war in iraq
leave the back door unlocked.
Chorus:Doo, doo, doo, sneakin’ through our back door.
Screw those troubles in Detroit! locked MY front door, oh boy!
Look at all those mooselimb people walking cross my lawn.
Fight the war in iraq
leave the back door unlocked
doo doo doo sneakin' through our back door!
It's two guys on the street acting crazy. But the photo seems screwy to me. There's a weird tint to the guy on the left and a pair of legs with no body under the sign. Was this photo shopped?
"what's that seal in the corner"
Official UAC seal
United American Committee
They're not, except with a court order that is. And we know they've gotten lots of those.
Here's what the state department said, seems fairly strong ins the defense of freedom of speech and the press to me. State Dept. Daily Briefing for Feb 03, 2006
Our response is to say that while we certainly don't agree with, support, or in some cases, we condemn the views that are aired in public that are published in media organizations around the world, we, at the same time, defend the right of those individuals to express their views. For us, freedom of expression is at the core of our democracy and it is something that we have shed blood and treasure around the world to defend and we will continue to do so. ....
No. I think I made it very clear that our defense of freedom of expression and the ability of individuals and media organizations to engage in free expression is forthright and it is strong, you know. This is -- our First Amendment rights, the freedom of expression, are some of the most strongly held and dearly held views that we have here in America. And certainly nothing that I said, I would hope, would imply any diminution of that support.
Then the next day, the White issued a statement that said:
We stand in solidarity with Denmark and our European allies in opposition to the outrageous acts in Syria today.
Then on Monday the state department official spokesman, assistant secretary of state Scott McCormack, "clarified" the mistaken impression some MSM reports had promulgated earlier :
QUESTION: Can I just follow up on that? I mean, you have -- am I right in saying -- condemned the publication, criticized the publication of the cartoons, but what about free speech and --
MR. MCCORMACK: I'm not sure that that's what was said, Jonathan. I think we've said that we understood why many Muslims found the cartoons offensive. We found -- we talked about the fact that we found, on Friday, the cartoons offensive. But we also spoke out very clearly in support of freedom of the press. As to what appears in newspapers, what is broadcast over the air waves, those are decisions in free countries for a free media to make, for journalists as well as editors to make. So just you can finish your question but I just wanted to make clear what it is that we said on Friday.
QUESTION: I mean, is there anything that you can do to support countries like Denmark that are facing these acts of violence?
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, we put -- the White House put out a statement over the weekend talking about our support for the Danish Prime Minister and the statements that he has made on the subject. Secretary Rice has also spoken with the Danish and Norwegian foreign ministers over the weekend in the wake of the attacks on their embassy as well. What we can do is to speak out very clearly in support of freedom of expression, freedom of the press, and urge understanding and tolerance, tolerance not violence. And I think that is what you're hearing from many quarters around the world concerning this issue.
That would suck. UAC would have -100 credibility.
Perhaps it was the uhs and ums that made the statements seem wishy washy, but I still think they were exactly that - wishy washy.
New meaning for "MOTown," wouldn't you say?
If they don't know it is because they don't care.
It's on tape don't worry, and there are plenty of accounts to back up these slimebags being there, there were 25-30 people at the UAC rally
That didn't sound right, I ment to say to back up THAT these slimebags were there, not to back up the slimebags :)
"and a pair of legs with no body under the sign."
It looks like the "headless horseman" there does have an arm near the left side of the sign. I can't really tell if it is a kid or small frame person and the rest of them is hidden behind the sign, or someone ducking down to avoid being photographed?
Perhaps whomever took this photo could provide more details.
uh, perhaps you should reflect and admit that ny has mucho tolerance for muslims protesting something or other at ground zero. or are you saying the photo is fabricated?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.