Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist

I recall a time in America when we had free speech AND people weren't placing crucifixes in urine. It is possible to have both.


76 posted on 02/06/2006 10:35:54 AM PST by TAdams8591 (The first amendment does NOT protect vulgar and obscene speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591
"I recall a time in America when we had free speech AND people weren't placing crucifixes in urine. It is possible to have both."

Only if no one in America wants to place a crucifix in urine. You cannot start picking and choosing which statements deserve protection and which do not. Once that happens, free speech no longer exists. Then it will only be speech which is politically correct that is allowed.
92 posted on 02/06/2006 10:59:14 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: TAdams8591
I recall a time in America when we had free speech AND people weren't placing crucifixes in urine. It is possible to have both.

That works in the case of "Piss Christ", because it's not an accidental case of blasphemy. But in the case of the cartoons, any representation of Mohammed constitutes blasphemy; it's not just these cartoons, it's any possible cartoon.

It doesn't end there, either, because other unintended blasphemies can (and do) occur. The logo of Coca Cola makes some blasphemy in Arabic, if viewed the right way. Every container of liquid is potentially somebody's "Piss Christ". You can never say, "I know blasphemy when I see it", because blasphemy exists in the eye of the offended.

108 posted on 02/06/2006 11:47:26 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson