Skip to comments.
A Rosenberg Takes On the Government, This Time Using the Law as a Means of Protest
NY Times ^
| February 5, 2006
| SAM ROBERTS
Posted on 02/05/2006 7:44:29 AM PST by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Steam came out my ears this AM as I read this kissy-face profile of the little spoiled commie brat grand daughter of those stinking spies, the Rosenbergs. The NY Times will NEVER let this story rest--although they say that it is "widely accepted" that those b*stards spied for the USSR and gave them atomic secrets, there are always softening sentencs. Here, "[atomic secrets], most of which the Russians had obtained from other sources."
A pox on you, you filthy, disgusting, NY Times. Are you saying that what the Rosenberg's did was OK? Then, [Sam Kinison voice] SAY IT! SAY IT ALREADY! And Mr. Sam Roberts, fancy guy reporter for the NY Times, why don't you ask this disgusting little commie about the millions of people that her soviet friends exterminated under Stalin? Still covering for Mr. Duranty, Mr. Roberts?
And dontcha just love how she "never thinks about" the issues surrounding the guilt of her grandparents?
And finally, as an American with Jewish blood in me, I can only be so ashamed of these people with whom I share tribal origins with who can only attack the greatest country that ever was, AND, the country that has been THE BEST to the Jews in history! Sorry for the rant, freepers, but this piece was hard for me to take this AM and I figured you would understand.
1
posted on
02/05/2006 7:44:31 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
SO according to her CRIME is not the problem . . . the "system" is.
Sheesh!
2
posted on
02/05/2006 7:47:25 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Pharmboy
Suppose Soviet archives conclusively revealed that her grandfather was a spy? They had Venona codenames. That makes them guilty.
3
posted on
02/05/2006 7:48:44 AM PST
by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
To: nonliberal
Thanks for mentioning Venona...I meant to, but in my typing rage I forgot. And here's the little commie beeyotch:
4
posted on
02/05/2006 7:50:30 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: Pharmboy
"I don't know what they did, but I know they couldn't get a fair trial, that the death penalty was wrong, and that they weren't guilty of what they were convicted of." Lying Stalinist Stooge.
To: BenLurkin
It is only OUR system that is to blame, you see. When it is a commie system it is fine to pull people out of their homes at four in the morning and put them in gulags OR starve them to death by the millions OR shoot them in the back of the head in some Moscow basement.
6
posted on
02/05/2006 7:53:54 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: ClearCase_guy
"I don't know what they did but I know they weren't guilty." Quite a lawyer...
Although I detest her and all her fellow travelers, I loathe the Times even more.
8
posted on
02/05/2006 7:57:00 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: Pharmboy
The NY Times as an organization, every employee there, and every relative thinks the Rosenbergs were innocent.
History has proven them guilty.
9
posted on
02/05/2006 7:57:31 AM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: rlmorel
The NY Times supports the Rosenbergs _because_ it knows they were guilty.
10
posted on
02/05/2006 7:59:03 AM PST
by
cgbg
(MSM and Democratic treason--fifty years and counting...)
To: Pharmboy
Suppose Soviet archives conclusively revealed that her grandfather was a spy? "It's not something I've spent much time thinking about," she replied.If this red diaper baby Marxist had had time to think of her reply,it would have been "false documents could easily have been planted in the files of The Glorious Motherland!"
To: thefactor; aculeus; Doctor Raoul; ELS; blam; SunkenCiv; PatrickHenry; wardaddy; A. Pole; ...
I just had to ping a few of you this morning so I could get your blood boiling as mine is. Just when you think the Times could get no lower...
12
posted on
02/05/2006 8:02:20 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: Gay State Conservative
Now you've done it! You've given her the answer she'll give next time...LOL!
13
posted on
02/05/2006 8:04:15 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: vik
As a bonus, she is defending the people who are currently out to get the Jews bigtime. This bad judgment thing appears to run in this family (in spades!). Odds are that this Marxist,among others in her clan,is an "atheist* Jew and,therefore,sees observant Jews as being dullards,pawns and criminals.
To: cgbg
LOL...thank you for the correction...that is MUCH more logical!
15
posted on
02/05/2006 8:06:39 AM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Pharmboy
The only good thing about the NYT's fixation with the Rosenbergs is that it keeps them from re-hashing Sacco and Vanzetti. :)
To: Gay State Conservative
You are right on. Even Marx himself was an "atheist" Jew.
17
posted on
02/05/2006 8:07:25 AM PST
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: Pharmboy
...A profile of Rachel Meeropol, the lead lawyer for a group of Muslim immigrants suing the United States government...
Well, that just fits perfectly, does it not?
18
posted on
02/05/2006 8:07:52 AM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Pharmboy
"A pox on you, you filthy, disgusting, NY Times."
In the words of Steve Martin, "Die you gravy sucking pigs."
19
posted on
02/05/2006 8:09:06 AM PST
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: Tijeras_Slim
TS, you are too funny, hombre. And, prolly not far from the truth...
20
posted on
02/05/2006 8:09:26 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson