Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US sides with Muslims in cartoon dispute
Yahoo! News ^ | 02/03/06 | Yahoo! News

Posted on 02/03/2006 9:04:55 AM PST by thesharkboy

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Washington on Friday condemned caricatures in European newspapers of Islam's Prophet Mohammad, siding with Muslims who are outraged that the publications put press freedom over respect for religion.

"These cartoons are indeed offensive to the belief of Muslims," State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said in answer to a question.

"We all fully recognize and respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility. Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aarielsharonism; absolutebushism; absurd; americandhimmies; americanjihad; appeasers; barfalert; breaking; brokebackstatedept; bungling; cartoons; christianhypocrites; dhimmi; dhimmitude; dim; dos; empty; fakers; foolish; gofigure; govwatch; incompetent; ineffective; islam; jihad; laughable; libertarians; meaningless; muslims; notbright; ofnouse; ofnovalue; pansyazzofficials; pathetic; ridiculous; rinowatch; selfimportant; statedepartment; trop; useless; weak; worsethanthefrench; worthless; xistianhypocrites
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-356 next last
To: thesharkboy

I am certain of a really, REALLY bad year for Islamolunatics who demand no Mohammed cartoons...


181 posted on 02/03/2006 10:03:09 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Maybe I've got my `head in a bottle' (quite likely) since I get a lot/most of my news here, it is so slanted elsewhere . . .
But I've noticed that issues ventilated here are showing up a few days or week or so later, some almost verbatim,
in National Review, Weekly Standard and on Fox's `Beltway Boys'.
Yeah, that's us: opinion leaders, `movers & shakers'.


182 posted on 02/03/2006 10:04:55 AM PST by tumblindice ("Animal's all right--just toss a grenade at him every now and then." 8-Ball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

This really isn't about civility and good manners.

It's about whether by large scale protests, one religious faith can abrogate the civil liberties of other people, in spite of the local laws, because something bothers their religious sensibilities.


183 posted on 02/03/2006 10:06:33 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

you put the question perfectly. This PC crap is outrageous.


184 posted on 02/03/2006 10:06:43 AM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Don't let Ben Sargent here about this!


185 posted on 02/03/2006 10:07:37 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
"We all fully recognize and respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility. Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable."

Buzzzziitt. Wrong Answer.

I am intolerant of other people's intolerance. If Islamics cannot tolerate our press freedom, then screw them!

Publish the damn cartoons in every venue possible. Spray paint them on water towers across the country until these bozos recognize that their intolerance will no longer be tolerated.

186 posted on 02/03/2006 10:08:26 AM PST by narby (Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
I just called the WH and went off on the poor lady answering the phone. I kept it clean, no cussing, but I was infuriated and let her know. I brought up how useless Condi is at the SD. I said so many things. She just kept trying to get off the phone with me.
187 posted on 02/03/2006 10:08:57 AM PST by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

You are correct (in all but my talents as a cartoonist ;} ). I disagree about giving the State Department "freedom of speech". They supposedly speak for the current Administration and they should remember that.

Only individuals can be granted freedom of speech; that freedom is freedom FOR speech, not freedom FROM others' speech. IOW, there is no "freedom from offensiveness".

You want that, then turn off the TV, radio, and don't set foot outside your house. (Make sure you get the teenagers out of the house first, however) ;)


188 posted on 02/03/2006 10:09:18 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

It figures.

Of course they do not give a damn about the babies getting up and school girls getting their heads chopped off.


189 posted on 02/03/2006 10:10:11 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reelfoot

Not to mention using the Bible as toilet paper and defiling Christian churches.


190 posted on 02/03/2006 10:10:28 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Paradox; Peach
Of course, they wouldn't be threatening to burn the place down, but that is besides the point.

No, that's precisely the point. Muslims can avoid any honest examination or appraisal of their "prophet" because the Koran tells them they must. Well, isn't that just so convenient for Islam.

I'd expect this from the UN, not the US State Dept. Bad form from State, who's silence is deafening when God or Christ are villified publically.

Additionally, the Counterterrorism Blog is reporting that some Muslims have Fabricated cartoons to worsened Danish controversy. Throwing fuel on the fire to justify their "anger" at the West. As if they ever needed any reason before.

191 posted on 02/03/2006 10:11:35 AM PST by prairiebreeze (God bless our fine military and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Argentine-Firecracker

And.... Why can Moslems build mosques in every western city in the World and Christians cannot in their lands? Why the double standard and when is the west going to take a firm, principled stand based on truth ?? They are out to get us,with a deliberate, very well thought out plan....and this is only the beginning...


192 posted on 02/03/2006 10:13:29 AM PST by Mad in Madrid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: dead
"Those are issues of taste and decorum, and it is not the business of our State Department to comment on such matters."

Agreed. It isn't in their job description to tell Americans how or what to think. It's their job to insure we have the freedom to think and protect our shores, borders and air space.

The gummint does not speak for the Citizens. It protects Citizens right to speak for themselves. They are carrying this 'nanny' federalism crap just a little too far, declaring such a murderous cult as a 'religion of peace and love' when we know better and the gummint knows better.

It's not diplomacy, it's hypocricy, and yes, it sends the wrong message. Not only makes the person who said it an idiot, but makes us all look like frightened idiots when just the opposite is the truth.

Note to terrorists: Don't mistake what some un-official spokesperson might say could be prompted by fear and is indicatative of the general state of the population in America.

We are not fearful. We are in a state of absolute anger. Be wise and discern the difference.

193 posted on 02/03/2006 10:13:45 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

How are they on inciting political hatred? Oh, right, that's free speech.
Sedition, good; poking fun at Muslims, evil. Got it.


194 posted on 02/03/2006 10:14:28 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger

Thanks FD.

State Dept? Pffft, its the US Dept of Dhimmitude. Even friends of mine who work at State will admit it.

Good to see you around, BTW. ;o)


195 posted on 02/03/2006 10:14:40 AM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: cinives


I wonder if the State Dept. would appreciate this.

WHY ARE CAMELS CALLED THE "SHIPS" OF THE DESERT?...BECAUSE THEY'RE FULL OF MUSLIM SEAMEN.
196 posted on 02/03/2006 10:15:12 AM PST by One4Indictment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
It's about whether by large scale protests, one religious faith can abrogate the civil liberties of other people, in spite of the local laws, because something bothers their religious sensibilities.

I agree with you there. The absurd threats made in the protests are very revealing about the extent to which islamo-fascism has penetrated Muslim populations in the West.

197 posted on 02/03/2006 10:15:57 AM PST by colorado tanker (We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
"These cartoons Muslim suicide bombers are indeed offensive to the belief of Muslims everyone else."
198 posted on 02/03/2006 10:17:40 AM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
Can you believe our State Department? What about the freedom of speech they are always talking about? This applies to everyone except muslims? The State Dept. can kiss me where the sun don't shine BUMP!
199 posted on 02/03/2006 10:18:47 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Why make fun of someone's belief system, when it's so much more to the point to satarize their bad behavior?

How about asking that question to the "artist" that put a crucifix in a jar of urine, or the "artist" that did a portrait of the Virgin Mary with elephant dung?

200 posted on 02/03/2006 10:19:45 AM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-356 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson