Posted on 02/03/2006 5:03:41 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
by Mark Finkelstein February 3, 2006 - 07:52
Let's give Today its due. It devoted extended coverage this morning to the growing nuclear threat from Iran. In Katie Couric's interview of Richard Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations, it was quickly established that Iran does indeed represent a serious danger. Much of the conversation involved a discussion of the various options - none of them ideal - to address the threat. One might argue that Haass' estimate that Iran is about five years away from acquiring a nuclear weapon could be dangerously optimistic, but he did not attempt to downplay the seriousness of the situation.
But, inevitably, Katie turned the talk to what she deemed domestic spying, alternatively dubbing it, with a wry smile, "the terrorist surveillance program."
Katie suggested that the administration offer specific examples of instances in which the program thwarted acts of terrorism. Haass rejected the idea: "I don't think they need to more specific. You don't want to give away intelligence methods."
But Haass claimed the Bush administration is "losing the argument" by asserting "that they can decide who and when to do it against. That they can do this and bypass . . . "
That's when Couric interrupted with her very dark depiction of the Bush administration:
"the sort of unbridled, power, right?"
She continued: "And even if the legislation has to be updated, that I think the American people probably would . . . "
Haass finished her sentence for her: "I think the American are grown-ups, they understand we're living in dangerous times; we've got to protect ourselves. But we can't give the executive branch or the president unlimited power to fight terrorism."
Let's review: Haass claims the Bush administration is "losing the argument" on terrorist surveillance. With whom, beyond the MSM and the left-wing establishment? Certainly not with the American people. From a recent Rasmussen report:
"Sixty-four percent (64%) of Americans believe the National Security Agency (NSA) should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects in other countries and people living in the United States. A Rasmussen Reports survey found that just 23% disagree."
Even 51% of Democrats support the idea, by the way.
And what of Katie's Orwellian view of the president's "unbridled power"? A president who briefed congressional leaders of both parties about the program. A president exercising nothing like the kind of power applied by liberal hero FDR during WWII.
The difference now? First, of course, is the fact that President Bush is a dreaded Republican. Second, in their heart of hearts, do liberals really believe that we are a country at war?
I saw a story of this person on the History channel. It was very interesting. I think he might have even been a Hollywood producer. The entire US government was struggling with the question: how do we show the American people how evil the Nazis are. And this person said: Show them the Nazis. Unembellished. Without comment. Just show what they say. Show their speeches. Show their political cartoons. And it worked.
Her face lift look good.
I bristle at Katie's unbridled stupidity.
I think Katie pines for the days when she wore her Executive kneepads...
I can answer that. Of course they know we are at war. That's why they are rooting so hard for the other side.
Liberal = traitor
Can I get on this ping list - last week was the last straw for me and Katie, but I want to be kept informed still. Thanks.
Ouch! Last week, Katie was tangling with Dan Barlett - who held his own very well - when the Jack Abramoff and GWB pictures came to light. God forbid Ms. Couric not recall every single person she's ever been photographed with - I wish someone at the White House had been better prepared for that question ; )
There's the Katie we all know and love....
Thought she was moving to the "dark side" after lambasting Dean and Kerry last week.
Thanks for your interest - welcome to the list!
Governs
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.