Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing 777-200LR Worldliner Certified to Carry Passengers Around the World
Boeing.com ^ | Feb. 02, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 02/02/2006 1:38:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

SEATTLE, Feb. 02, 2006 -- The world's longest-range commercial jetliner, the Boeing [NYSE: BA] 777-200LR Worldliner, now is certified by U.S. and European authorities to enter into passenger service with airlines around the world. The 777-200LR (Longer Range) is the fifth and newest member of the market-leading 777 airplane family.

Certification approval by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) formally recognizes that the 777-200LR has successfully completed all testing and safety requirements during its six-month flight-test program.

"The 777-200LR will revolutionize the way people travel with the ability to connect just about any two cities around the world," said Lars Andersen, vice president and program manager, 777 Program, Boeing Commercial Airplanes. "The 777-200LR is more fuel efficient, has more range, and carries more passengers and cargo than the competition."

The FAA and EASA certifications grant an amended type certificate for the 777 and a production certificate authorizing Boeing to build the 777-200LR and deliver it to airlines for passenger service. The first 777-200LR will be delivered to Pakistan International Airlines later this month.

"The 777-200LR performed very well throughout its comprehensive flight test program for certification," said Bob Buchholz, chief engineer, 777 Safety, Certification and Performance. "In addition, the certification work will benefit us as we continue to develop the 777 Freighter."

Two 777-200LR flight test airplanes completed 886 flight hours on 328 flights, and 318 ground test hours. On both test airplanes, 27.8 miles of wiring were installed for the instrumentation used to record flight test data. More than 73 terabits (73 followed by 12 zeros) of data were recorded and analyzed. Boeing kept an online journal of the 777-200LR flight test activity, which is available at http://www.boeing.com/commercial/777family/200LR/flight_test/.

To develop the 777-200LR, Boeing strengthened the airplane's primary structure to accommodate an increased gross weight for takeoff and a higher engine thrust. Also, provisions were added to allow the 777-200LR to carry up to three additional fuel tanks. This work enables the airplane to carry more fuel, which allows it to fly farther and to serve as the platform for the 777 Freighter.

The 777-200LR uses many of the same advances developed with the 777-300ER (Extended Range), such as raked wingtips and other drag reducing improvements, and tail-strike protection. The 777-200LR is powered exclusively by the GE90-110B1L, a re-rated version of the powerful GE90-115BL used on the 777-300ER.

The 777-200LR is capable of connecting virtually any two cities in the world nonstop. In service it can carry 301 passengers up to 9,420 nautical miles (17,445 kilometers).

In addition to Pakistan International Airlines, EVA Air, Emirates, Air Canada, and Air India have ordered the 777-200LR. To date, 44 airlines around the world have ordered 827 777s.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 777; 777200lr; boeing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: jmq
"I ain't going over any pond with only two engines. Period. I betcha the gas mileage is good though."

You aint kidding. I've worked with aircraft all my life, and I'll never get on an airplane crossing an ocean with only two engines. If you lose one, you lose 50 percent of your power.

That's Boeing and airline stupidity, period. Lets risk the lives of our passengers to save a few bucks per trip.
41 posted on 02/02/2006 2:23:19 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
The circumference of the earth at its widest point is about 25,000 miles, or a jet needs about a 12,500 range to fly half-way around the earth. However, many international flights go over the North Pole, e.g., to shorten the distance.

Ah, but there's a little bit of optimistic specmanship going on here: The distance to a city that is exactly half-way around the world is the same, North Pole route or not.

42 posted on 02/02/2006 2:24:33 PM PST by Skibane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Why would anyone want to fly around the world? You end up where you started.


43 posted on 02/02/2006 2:25:46 PM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Why would anyone want to fly around the world? You end up where you started.


44 posted on 02/02/2006 2:25:59 PM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skibane

Besides distance, you are also dealing with prevailing winds and other considerations.


45 posted on 02/02/2006 2:29:59 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jmq
I ain't going over any pond with only two engines.

I went to CH via DeGaul on 767 within a few months of the FAA allowing twin engine flights. Must have been around 1985.

IIRC, they had to fly further North to be within X amount of time of land at any given time.

46 posted on 02/02/2006 2:34:25 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead
There are planes on the drawing board that could take off from St. Louis and land back in St. Louis in less than 10 minutes.

When I was very new to flying I could land, take off, land, take off, land, take off and finally land, all if a very few seconds!

47 posted on 02/02/2006 2:35:46 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The arrival of the 777-200LR in airline service means that we are very close to QANTAS flying between Sydney and London non-stop using this plane.


48 posted on 02/02/2006 2:36:34 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Denver Ditdat

heehee Thats quicker than 10 minutes!


49 posted on 02/02/2006 2:37:24 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dead
There are planes on the drawing board that could take off from St. Louis and land back in St. Louis in less than 10 minutes

Why would anyone want to go from St Louis to St Louis?

50 posted on 02/02/2006 2:38:20 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
<g>
51 posted on 02/02/2006 2:42:24 PM PST by Denver Ditdat (No Islam = Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
Why would anyone want to fly around the world? You end up where you started.

I don't right the headlines. I just ridicule them.

52 posted on 02/02/2006 3:07:26 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Thanks for the map site. Thats cool!


53 posted on 02/02/2006 3:09:38 PM PST by JOE6PAK (...diagonally parked in a parallel universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Maybe they could install a rotary ALCM launcher and sell some B-777's!
54 posted on 02/02/2006 3:18:47 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
And in reality it would need to go a few hundred extra miles up and then back down to get out of the atmosphere. Unless the plane can handle er... like mach 180 at sea level? That speed will vaporize all know materials and kill millions with the shockwave.
55 posted on 02/02/2006 3:22:43 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Godwinson; jmq
According to engineers - more engines means more probablity something will go wrong with an engine.

The let's pass laws prohibiting planes from having any engines. Then flying will be completely safe.

That being said, I've crossed the Atlantic on planes with 2, 3 and 4 engines. (707, DC-8, 747, A-340; L-1011; 767, 777.) Anything that's going to cause 2 engines to fail is probably going to cause all of the engines to fail.

56 posted on 02/02/2006 3:23:53 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"But doesn't it only have the range to go a little less than half way around the world?"

For Boeing, all that matters for now is that the plane can fly from Sydney to London and back, non-stop, at all times of the year, and with a profitable load. The 777-200LR may be coming up a bit short for now, but Boeing will find a way to meet this goal for Qantas and British Airways.

57 posted on 02/02/2006 3:32:01 PM PST by CALawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
The -200LR has already done "Hong Kong to London" non-stop.

Looking at a map, the distances seem roughly equivalent.

58 posted on 02/02/2006 3:41:04 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dead

It may be able to take off and land in less than 10 mins but it still takes you 3 hours to get through security.


59 posted on 02/02/2006 3:55:15 PM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead

Lol, I have a remote control airplane that can do that...


60 posted on 02/02/2006 4:02:52 PM PST by LonghornFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson