Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE ALITO CONFIRMATION(joyful "rub their noses-in-it" read)
The Oregonian ^ | February 02, 2006 | David Reinhard

Posted on 02/02/2006 11:10:50 AM PST by crazyhorse691

Thank you, John Kerry. Or make that, merci beaucoup.

Almost single-handedly, the Massachusetts senator turned a Democratic defeat into an instructive, five-star disaster.

Everyone knew Democrats didn't have the votes to defeat Judge Samuel Alito in an up-or-down vote. Everyone knew they didn't have the 41 votes to sustain a filibuster of President Bush's Supreme Court nominee. But that didn't stop Kerry. Yes, as he might say, who among us doesn't want to launch a futile filibuster of an indisputably qualified nominee to placate the left-wing blogocracy and anti-Alito hysterics on The New York Times' editorial board?

And Monsieur Kerry did all this in his own special way. He phoned in his "Filibuster Alito" call from the ski slopes of Switzerland. C'est magnifique. It provided a moment of exquisite clarification, a confirming coda, in our age's recent court wars.

Most Democrats probably wanted to lick their wounds and fall back to fight another day after the mess Judiciary Committee Democrats made of themselves in the Alito hearings. Alito had answered -- or, where appropriate, refused to answer -- their often-windbag questions with erudition and aplomb. He had set out his philosophy and showed his skills and temperament during four long days. His support in public opinion polls had gone up. Judiciary Committee Democrats, by contrast, had became the object of ridicule, and not just on the right. The efforts of Sen. Ted Kennedy and others to tar Alito as some ethically challenged racist/sexist were worse than ugly: They were lame and ineffective.

The teary exit of Alito's wife, Martha, from the hearing room highlighted the human toll of these attempted "borkings" and might have suggested that the days of these glorified muggings by Senate Democrats were at an end. But it's a measure of the left's bitter zaniness about Alito that her tears only occasioned cheap shots -- "his wife's bizarrely over-covered crying jag," The New York Times said in one of the nicer ones -- and the failure to demonize Alito only produced calls for a filibuster everyone knew would fail.

How to explain a move that was less a tactic than a tantrum? Simple: Alito would not give them the assurances they demanded on certain issues. He would not commit to judicial results they favored.

More specifically, he failed to pass the litmus test of the folks who constantly say they oppose litmus tests: unlimited abortion on demand. He explained his past rulings on both sides of the issue. He promised to give Supreme Court precedents all due consideration. He testified at length about the constitutional issues involved. But he wouldn't make pronouncements on a matter that will inevitably come before the high court in one form or another.

In the end, the fans of outcome-based judging were refighting the 2004 presidential election.

Consider the impact of Kerry's march of folly. Democratic filibusterers have set a new standard for Supreme Court confirmation. Alito spent 15 distinguished years on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Court colleagues -- judges nominated by conservative and liberal presidents -- endorsed Alito. Former clerks -- abortion-rights fans and liberals among them -- praised his nonideological approach to judging. The American Bar Association gave the him a unanimous "well-qualified" grade.

And, still, 24 Democrats not only opposed Alito, but opposed him enough to filibuster. Will Republicans who may oppose the views of a Democratic president's nominee feel free to filibuster? Let's hope not, but Democrats who want to be president won't have standing to complain. Hillary Clinton, Evan Bayh, Joe Biden and Barack Obama all joined Kerry.

Having lost the Alito vote, the filibuster crowd lost credibility and influence in future nomination battles. In fact, Kerry forced many who thought a futile filibuster unwise to go along. California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, for example, had said a filibuster was unjustifiable. This week she filibustered. Kerry no doubt offered her a ready rationale for her flip-flop:

I actually opposed the filibuster before I voted for the filibuster.

David Reinhard, associate editor, can be reached at 503-221-8152 or davidreinhard@news.oregonian.com.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: alito; filibuster; kerry; liberallosers; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I can hear the moonbats gnashing of teeth all over Portland. I predict a big run on antidepressants in the next few weeks and maybe some of them will move(Canada is no longer a safe haven) or take advantage of Oregons law.
1 posted on 02/02/2006 11:10:53 AM PST by crazyhorse691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Ketchup red all over his face.


2 posted on 02/02/2006 11:14:00 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Canada is not a safe haven, and Castro can't live much longer. Maybe they can go to Venezuela or North Korea.


3 posted on 02/02/2006 11:14:18 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

HOORAY FOR JUSTICE ALITO!!

And lots of rejoicing over the moonbats' defeat! :)


4 posted on 02/02/2006 11:14:37 AM PST by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Not exactly what one would call a non-partisan attitude.


5 posted on 02/02/2006 11:15:09 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

This is priceless. One of the best skewerings of Monsieur Kerry I have ever read.


6 posted on 02/02/2006 11:15:41 AM PST by Dems_R_Losers (Only losers boast about how close it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Please, please, PLEASE, Howard Dean. PLEASE nominate John Kerry for Prez in 2008.


7 posted on 02/02/2006 11:17:41 AM PST by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Is no one in charge of the dems? Some cooler head who can tell them when they're behaving like idiots? Someone who, at least, can count? Guess not.


8 posted on 02/02/2006 11:19:15 AM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Ouch, the monsieurbats will not like this one bit.


9 posted on 02/02/2006 11:20:06 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Hee, hee. "It's funny because it's true," - H. Simpson.


10 posted on 02/02/2006 11:20:44 AM PST by Viet Vet in Augusta GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Hehehehehehehe!


11 posted on 02/02/2006 11:22:07 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
Having lost the Alito vote, the filibuster crowd lost credibility and influence in future nomination battles. In fact, Kerry forced many who thought a futile filibuster unwise to go along.
How many Democrats voted in favor of Alito?

How many of the Democrats who voted in favor of Alito were not from redstates - and how many of the Democrats who voted in favor of Alito will not have to stand for reelection this November?

Any?


12 posted on 02/02/2006 11:28:23 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw
Is no one in charge of the dems?

I suppose that would be Dean.

Some cooler head

Strike one.

who can tell them when they're behaving like idiots?

Strike two.

Someone who, at least, can count?

Strike three, they're out!

13 posted on 02/02/2006 11:34:55 AM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
Hey ~ left-wing moonbats:


14 posted on 02/02/2006 11:36:36 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Maybe this is what GWB has been planning for all along - conservatives to the north - get all the libs to move to Mexico, THEN close the border! All the free-loaders behind 1 border.


15 posted on 02/02/2006 11:39:47 AM PST by whatexit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
Lurch wanted to be commander in chief of the United States. Failing to achieve that position in life , he has decided to settle for, to go down in history forever, to be known as,....... Commander in Chief of DUmmy land!...Good luck with your new position Lurch!I'm sure you'll like it!
16 posted on 02/02/2006 11:43:13 AM PST by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

And he wants to be President. How can a guy claim the ability to lead the world's greatest nation if he can lead a few of most liberally rabid of his own party?


17 posted on 02/02/2006 11:49:06 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

The filibuster crowd lost credibility when they put John Fizzlebluster Kerry at the helm. They'd still have failed if they'd chosen a superior leader, but Kerry's personal shortcomings depressed the vote (against cloture). He couldn't get anyone behind him, who wasn't already there anyway (due to reelection concerns).


18 posted on 02/02/2006 11:49:20 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
...who among us doesn't want to launch a futile filibuster of an indisputably qualified nominee to placate the left-wing blogocracy and anti-Alito hysterics on The New York Times' editorial board?

Who indeed? Phoning it in from the Swiss ski slopes was the sort of political gift that keeps on giving. You just can't make that stuff up.

19 posted on 02/02/2006 11:51:41 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
In the Oregonian from Portland?

A reminder of the greatest News Site in the North West... http://orbusmax.com/

20 posted on 02/02/2006 11:53:12 AM PST by tubebender (Always remember that you're unique. Just like everyone else...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson