Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State of the Democratic party
Townhall ^ | Feb 2, 2006 | by Tony Blankley

Posted on 02/02/2006 1:33:36 AM PST by Jim Robinson

During an election campaign, political operatives are fond of seeking to induce in their opponent a negative "defining moment." That is to say a highly publicized moment when their opponent portrays everything that is wrong with him. In 2004, John Kerry provided that moment when he said he voted for the $87 billion before he voted against it.

Surely, at the State of the Union address the Democratic Party provided such a moment when, as has already been well commented on by others, they wildly applauded President Bush's statement that Congress failed to pass Social Security reform last year.

As the party of reactionary inertia -- as the party that not only doesn't have any solutions to today's dangers and problems but denies that such problems exist -- the Democrats on the floor of the House Tuesday night demonstrated a flawless, intuitive sense of its new, disfunctional self.

The Democrats' wild applause on behalf of doing nothing was more than a merely tactical political blunder. It displayed a deeper truth about them.

If one recalls, last year, the official position of the Democratic Party was not only that they opposed President Bush's Social Security reform, they argued there was no crisis -- no major problem that required rectification.

(In fact, Social Security has $4 trillion of unfunded liability, and if major changes are not made quickly, we will only be able to pay the retired baby boomers about 70 cents for each dollar of promised benefits.)

Social Security is the single most iconic Democratic Party issue of the past hundred years -- the Democrats created Social Security in 1935, and have won countless elections since then by beating up Republicans for allegedly not supporting it. It was the Democratic Party's sacred virgin. They would lie for it, die for it, steal for it, demagogue for it -- but never cheer its demise or harm, even sarcastically.

Their collective decision to cheer the failure of the body politic to provide for sufficient revenues to pay the benefits was an act of historic shame for the Democratic Party.

Worse than that for the Democrats, it shows how severely degraded their political instincts have become. Tip O'Neil's Democratic Party of 20 years ago would never have cheered the failure of Social Security -- even to try to make a small political point. To be sure, they would demagogue the issue ruthlessly, but never be seen to be walking away from the sacred program.

Until George Bush became president, the Democrats, for better and for worse, were a liberal party. Deformed by hatred of the current president, the Democrats have become a nihilist party.

It is one thing to oppose one's opponent's policies. After all, Benjamin Disraeli, the founder of the modern British Tory Party, once famously observed that the job of an opposition party is to oppose. But he also said they should oppose but not obstruct. And while in the minority he carefully proposed policies he would implement when his party came into power.

But today's Democrats largely refuse to even admit that the problems President Bush is trying to solve even exist. They offer nothing. And this mentality was also on display Tuesday night in Congress. On most of the president's major pronouncements regarding our war against radical Islam, the Democrats sat on their hands.

Or, in the case of Hillary Clinton when a non-response was politically impossible, she would, with an icy look that could freeze a furnace, applaud in a slow, robotic, menacing manner. Woe betide the object of that frigid esteem. On Iraq, on Iran, on intercepting terrorist communications, they have no positive proposals for success.

President Bush caught the essence of today's Democratic Party in a rather elegant double epigram: "Hindsight alone is not wisdom, And second-guessing is not a strategy."

I wouldn't be surprised to see that thought become the strategic negative communication theme for the Republican Party this campaign season. That is the trouble with being a rotten tomato-throwing member of the bleacher crowd. One may develop a small following amongst one's fellow complainers, but no large group of people are going to ask you to come out and lead the team.

But not satisfied to be a head in the sand, reflexively negative opposition party, an increasing number of Democrats and their supporters in the leftish fever swamps have started calling for President Bush's impeachment.

While I haven't seen any polls yet on the subject, I would guess that something less than 10 percent of the American voting public would look forward to seeing the last two years of the Bush presidency consumed with a Democratic Party-controlled Congress trying to impeach the president during a time of war.

Somehow the Democratic Party -- for 180 years the most electorally successful political party on the planet -- has now almost completely mutated into a party too loathsome to be seen in public, and too nihilistic to be trusted with control of even a single branch of government.

Tony Blankley is the author of The West's Last Chance and editorial page editor for the Washington Times.

Copyright © 2006 Townhall.com


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; blankley; democratimplosion; lostdems; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2006 1:33:38 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson


For later today. WAY past my bedtime...lol.


2 posted on 02/02/2006 1:36:14 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
they wildly applauded President Bush's statement that Congress failed to pass Social Security reform last year.

Do you think that might have been a calculated statement on Bush's part?

3 posted on 02/02/2006 1:38:46 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; onyx

Do y'all ever sleep? I have an excuse, I am at work.


4 posted on 02/02/2006 1:47:59 AM PST by SeeRushToldU_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

"....almost completely mutated into a party too loathsome to be seen in public,...."

That description of today's democratic party is as close to perfect as we are likely to get.


5 posted on 02/02/2006 1:48:40 AM PST by billhilly (The Democrat symbol is no longer the donkey, it's a strait Jacket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So; Howlin; BigSkyFreeper; All


Nighty-night for me right now!

Nite all.


6 posted on 02/02/2006 1:49:01 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I love the "wisdom" of: "Hindsight alone is not wisdom And second guessing is not a strategy."

Now there's a statement I can get behind! Perhaps it should be the Republican motto for the next election.


7 posted on 02/02/2006 1:49:48 AM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"Hindsight alone is not wisdom, And second-guessing is not a strategy."

Here's a tagline for somebody.

8 posted on 02/02/2006 1:50:15 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So

The last two night have been the first time I've done this in MONTHS! I have a splint on my arm and it's keeping me up all hours!


9 posted on 02/02/2006 1:50:38 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I can already picture the 2006 campaign ads with the Rats cheering a failure to protect Social Security. Whether or not it will end up being a huge miscalculation we won't know until November, but it certainly can't hurt the Republicans.


10 posted on 02/02/2006 1:51:24 AM PST by Nova442
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
When Harry Reid (in an on the record interview) refuses to say who the leader of the Dem party is...

I think you could say they even loath themselves.
11 posted on 02/02/2006 1:52:55 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Immediately following the SOTU address some talking head madt the comment that President Bush had trapped the dems with that clever applause line. I'm sorry I don't rember who it was, but in hindsight, the timeing of the utterance and the beginning of the applause, could indicate that it was indeed a trap.
12 posted on 02/02/2006 1:53:34 AM PST by billhilly (The Democrat symbol is no longer the donkey, it's a strait Jacket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Sorry folks. My spelling, while never perfect, is not even up to bad yet this morning.


13 posted on 02/02/2006 1:55:34 AM PST by billhilly (The Democrat symbol is no longer the donkey, it's a strait Jacket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BTTT. Perfection in print.


14 posted on 02/02/2006 1:58:19 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Well, it sure left them smiling like fools, didn't it?


15 posted on 02/02/2006 1:58:27 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
has now almost completely mutated into a party too loathsome to be seen in public, and too nihilistic to be trusted with control of even a single branch of government.

Now that bears repeating.

16 posted on 02/02/2006 2:01:43 AM PST by Lurker (In God I trust. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"While I haven't seen any polls yet on the subject, I would guess that something less than 10 percent of the American voting public would look forward to seeing the last two years of the Bush presidency consumed with a Democratic Party-controlled Congress trying to impeach the president during a time of war."

I'd say closer to 30%. Mr. Blankley underestimates the level of truly evil and stupid people currently registered to vote. Some of those troglodytes were on full display yesterday when the President visited here in Nashville.

17 posted on 02/02/2006 2:07:18 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
they wildly applauded President Bush's statement that Congress failed to pass Social Security reform last year.

When I watched this, my immediate thought was "Wow! They may finally capture the title of "The Stupid Party" from the GOP this year".

18 posted on 02/02/2006 2:12:19 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
When Harry Reid (in an on the record interview) refuses to say who the leader of the Dem party is...

None dare openly speak the name of the Chappasquaw.

"Your policies are as dust before the power of the Dim side..."

19 posted on 02/02/2006 2:13:05 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Harry Reid (in an on the record interview) refuses to say who the leader of the Dem party is

The soundbite of 1000 campaign commercials.

20 posted on 02/02/2006 2:13:12 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson