Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deputy shoots airman after 100-mph chase (w/video)
MSNBC ^ | 9:42 a.m. ET Feb. 1, 2006 | AP

Posted on 02/01/2006 8:26:30 AM PST by Smogger

CHINO, Calif. - A videotape released Tuesday shows a sheriff’s deputy shooting an unarmed Air Force policeman who recently returned from Iraq as he appeared to obey an order to get up off the ground.

...

'Get up' Carrion is heard telling the officer he is unarmed and is in the military.

At one point, a voice is heard saying several times: “Get up.”

Carrion says: “I’m gonna get up.” As he rises, at least four shots are fired and Carrion collapses, crying out in pain.

“Shots fired! Shots fired!” someone shouts.

In a telephone interview conducted in Spanish, Valdez said after the shooting, Carrion asks the deputy, “Why did you shoot me if you told me to stand up?” That alleged exchange cannot be heard on the video.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: badcopnodonut; bang; banglist; california; chino; crime; donutwatch; govwatch; highspeedchase; jackbootedthugs; sheriff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last
To: Smogger

I can promise you there will be some of the boot-int-the-face crowd that will defend this and dispute any accusation of wrongdoing.

With no video, the soldier would have little legal recourse.


201 posted on 02/01/2006 9:56:14 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

" Take him off the police force and never let him carry a gun again."

That is pretty tough punishment. Do you think I can get similar treatment for losing my temper and putting 4 rounds in a person I had never seen in my life until the event?


202 posted on 02/01/2006 9:59:23 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: djf

"The perp in this case (the deputy) shouldn't be allowed to have a drivers license, much less be sanctioned to carry a gun in the name of the law."

You mean that is what they will do to me if I take 4 shots at an unarmed person obeying my orders and only hit 3 without killing?


203 posted on 02/01/2006 10:08:05 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Tactical

"I see the case going to Federal court for prosecution of the Deputy for a Civil Rights violation."

Lenient. BTW, what do you do different from the target in this case if a cop tells you to get up?


204 posted on 02/01/2006 10:12:49 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1569430/posts?page=193#193


205 posted on 02/01/2006 10:14:06 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

WAS there a 100mph chase? Is there video? It is to be assumed the cop was going to lie about the circumstances of the shooting, so the circumstances of the stop might very well be fabrication.


206 posted on 02/01/2006 10:15:12 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
IMHO, the cop had severe tunnel vision. he was saying, "get up!"

then, when the kid tried to get up and the deputy shot him, the deputy says, "you don't get up!"

the cop seems to be totally fried and was running on adrenaline. which is understandable after a 100mph chase. why was this kid in the chase in the first place? tough to be on someones side after you have been speeding away from them at 100mph. but he did not deserve to be shot.

207 posted on 02/01/2006 10:20:26 PM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Given the double bind, the less risky option would be to freeze in a visibly harmless position and ask "I can't understand you, what did you say," slowly, two or three times. But no way there should be a legal requirement to guess your way to safety.


208 posted on 02/01/2006 10:26:36 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
why was this kid in the chase in the first place? tough to be on someones side after you have been speeding away from them at 100mph. but he did not deserve to be shot.

You'd have to ask the driver, the Airman was the passenger, just "along for the ride" so to speak.

209 posted on 02/01/2006 10:50:19 PM PST by El Gato (The Second Amendment is the Reset Button of the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Thinking doubtless "I did nothing wrong, I have nothing to fear." Bzzzzzzt!


210 posted on 02/01/2006 10:52:25 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

You can say that again.

There is a group here that will always defend LEOs regardless.

I can't see why the deputy shot the guy....looked like several times.

I clearly heard someone saying get up before the guy started to get up and got shot.

Reminds me of that crazy woman cop misfiring her gun....we had that video around here somewhere.

I support the police but they make mistakes and this looks like one. I see nothing racial about this though the MSM thinks otherwise.


211 posted on 02/01/2006 10:54:38 PM PST by wardaddy (Southern American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Shortstop7
Four shots fired? At close range?
Ridiculous..........

YUP! It is.

212 posted on 02/02/2006 4:49:26 AM PST by Tactical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
"I see the case going to Federal court for prosecution of the Deputy for a Civil Rights violation."

Lenient. BTW, what do you do different from the target in this case if a cop tells you to get up?

From what I've read the FBI is looking at the case and if the Feds prosecute, there isn't going to be anything lenient about it at all. Big blocks of time in custody with the Feds and other civil penalties that will ruin the cops life if convicted.

The kid that was shot appears to have done everything right, up to the point of following the Deputy's instructions to "get up". From that point on, it was out of his control.

I would like to see the entire video though, as to how the kid was acting prior to being put on the ground. Who knows what he was doing? Still doesn't look good for the Deputy at this point.

213 posted on 02/02/2006 4:55:35 AM PST by Tactical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

Does your title mean that this links to the video mentioned in the story? Because I don't see it anywhere.

Dan


214 posted on 02/02/2006 5:05:13 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Watch the video.

... maybe I'll wait for the "America's Most Wanted" re-enactment.

215 posted on 02/02/2006 5:15:09 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Ben Mugged wrote:
I guess he could have been sitting at the side of the road thinking "the next Corvette that comes by at 100mph I'm going to chase it down and shoot the passenger".

REPLY:

That sounds as plausible as any excuse cops use to kill or maim their prey, err, victim, err perp.........

Until robots take over their will always be the human element to police brutality.

When did it become OK to shoot to kill just because someone didn't instantly obey an insane cops command.
216 posted on 02/02/2006 5:19:29 AM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
I watch "Cops" on court teevee once or twice a week. In easily 75% of the arrests they make of a previously fleeing perp (knowing full well that the cameras are running) they continue to beat on the perp well after he is subdued and/or cooperating. The same is true for most live telecasts of car-chases.

I'll bet the Deputy here didn't know he was being filmed.

217 posted on 02/02/2006 5:21:49 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
A. He would not shut his mouth. B. I never heard anyone tell him get up. C. You do not tell the police what you are gonna do...you obey what they say do.

Which, exactly, of those behaviors rises to the level of requiring the officer to use deadly force to stop said behavior?

218 posted on 02/02/2006 5:39:03 AM PST by Terabitten (The only time you can have too much ammunition is when you're swimming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus
Having said all that, it seems like a situation where the cop should have used phyisical restraint rather than deadly force. Can LEO Freepers comment on that?

The purpose of using deadly force of any variety is to stop the behavior that the suspect is engaging in. That is the SOLE purpose of deadly force for a law enforcement officer, or a private citizen for that matter.

219 posted on 02/02/2006 5:44:43 AM PST by Terabitten (The only time you can have too much ammunition is when you're swimming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
hispanarepublicana wrote:
Ruiz said he immediately turned a tape over to the Sheriff's Department after the incident, but he has retained an attorney because of incidents that have happened since then. Luis Carrillo, a South Pasadena attorney, said he's helping Ruiz to make sure his rights are not violated. Carrillo said over a 12-hour period after the video tape was handed over to deputies, Ruiz was pulled over three times by officers. "His whole vehicle gets searched. It was totally unnecessary," Carrillo said. Staff writer Wendy Leung contributed to this story.

REPLY:

This is not a brown or black thing it is about police over stepping their authority.

These pull overs by the cops is an attempt to intimidate this guy into doing anything so that the cops can retaliate.

Bad cops and some good cops ignorantly hang together to misguidedly protect one of their own.

If I was Ruiz I would be very careful when away from his home.

There is no protection for civilians when rogue cops come to get you.
220 posted on 02/02/2006 5:49:52 AM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson