Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: holymoly

To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public.


36 posted on 02/01/2006 7:24:45 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: popdonnelly
To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public.

"Assault weapon" is a propaganda term. It is used to demonize virtually any type of firearm anti-gunners don't like, including handguns, rifles and shotguns.

Semi-automatic rifle,s such as the AK-47 look-alikes (WASR-10) and SKS Carbine, function no differently than a semi-automatic "hunting rifle". Pull the trigger, and it fires one bullet, and one bullet only.

People in many states hunt white-tail deer with WASR-10, SKS Carbines, and similar rifles. The 7.62x39 cartridge, for which these firearms are chambered, is virtually identical to one of the most popular hunting cartridges in America - the .30-30 Winchester.

Furthermore, in this country I don't need a "reason" to own one of these firearms. This is the United States, not the Peoples Republic of China.

39 posted on 02/01/2006 7:30:19 AM PST by holymoly (Ahhhhh. Beer so cold it hurts my teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

I don't either. Self defense weapons and militia weapons, OTOH ... there's no such thing as "too many".


40 posted on 02/01/2006 7:32:31 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly
To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public.

Do you know what an "assault weapon" is? If you do, please elucidate. Do you think that the public should have fewer options regarding choice of personal firearms than the police?

42 posted on 02/01/2006 7:33:17 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

The Warsaw Ghetto.
Treblinka.
Auschwitz.
Sobibor.
Majdanek.
Belzek.

Should I go on?


43 posted on 02/01/2006 7:34:48 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly
To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public.

The 2nd amendment to the Constitution affirms my God-given right to protect my family and my freedoms from those who would take them away. That's all the reason I need.

44 posted on 02/01/2006 7:34:57 AM PST by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

Uh, right. So, in your mind "too much" of whatever is automatically a "bad" thing? And you propose to quantify "too much" how? Maybe "too much" is defined as "more than I have"?

Too much horsepower, firepower, audio power. Yeah, maybe we DO need to limit these kinds of things. I mean, what if our Police start running up against more and more thugs who work out for three hours five days a week and are so ripped that they can fold the cops up like a piece of paper and drop them through a mail slot? Yeah. Nobody oughta be allowed to be so buffed. Gottta regulate gyms.

And it's awfully hard to catch a ZR1 'vette when all you've got is a 3.4L Lumina -- even with radio. The Proshces and even the Audi A4's -- can't catch 'em. Nobody should be allowed to buy a car with more power than, say, a 1966 VW Beetle.

Also, there's this thing about loud music. Even in traffic some people just have to have their mariachis blasting out so everyone can hear it for a block or two. Nobody needs that kind of audio power. CAr stereos should be regulated by the DOT and limited to 12 watts per channel. And none of these bolted-into-the-trunk power amps, either; those things are definitely OUT.

Finally, you know there are some houses in town that are just obscene. They really hog up the land and nobody needs that kind of space. We oughta limit home construction to an absolute max of 3,500 sq. ft. Those big places just have too many electrical outlets and too much plumbing, and don't even get me started on heating and cooling costs. Oy vey!

Yeah, THAT'd be "Wonderland", alright. Sheer Nirvana 24/7.

Dream on, pal, we're not buying into your panty-waist nightmare. The misuse of power on the part of the few in no way invalidates the possession of power on the part of the many.


47 posted on 02/01/2006 7:44:15 AM PST by HKMk23 (I am God. Even from eternity I am He, and there is none who can deliver out of My hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

Consider it like Pornography, it is available to those who want it.


50 posted on 02/01/2006 7:50:12 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

Why should I have to show you a reason? So long as I don't cause harm to anyone elses life, liberty, or property with one, what's the problem?


51 posted on 02/01/2006 7:53:41 AM PST by Tree of Liberty (requiescat in pace, President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

Because they're fun to fire. Is that a good enough reason for you, Mrs. Brady?


55 posted on 02/01/2006 8:11:17 AM PST by flada (Posting in a manner reminiscent of Jen-gis Kahn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

Based on the definition of an assault weapon, which you didn't scroll down the thread to read before popping off, an Assault Weapon is actually a powered down version of the OEM rifle. I assume to reduce collateral damage in an assault.


62 posted on 02/01/2006 8:37:26 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (Enemy Idealogies: Pacifism, Liberalism, and Feminism, Islamic Supremacism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly
To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public.

It's called the Second Amendment.

65 posted on 02/01/2006 8:47:34 AM PST by Centurion2000 (SUPPORT THE DANES! BURN A KORAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public.



You seem to be forgetting the entire purpose of the Second Amendment. Those of assault weapons are precisely the kind of weapon the founders would have it tended to be sold to the public. Maybe you could take a lesson from a Democrat:

"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible"

Senator Hubert H. Humphrey (D) Minn.
"Know Your Lawmakers" Guns (magazine), February, 1960, p. 4.


86 posted on 02/01/2006 10:08:16 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly
To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public.

To be honest, people like you scare me.

93 posted on 02/01/2006 10:49:30 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly

Spoken like a true Liberal. If the government ever goes bad, you would want a gun (the deadlier the better) to preserve your personal liberty. Or do you prefer to be led away to the gulag like a sheep to the slaughter? You say it can't/hasn't happened? Fool.


95 posted on 02/01/2006 11:52:15 AM PST by TexasRepublic (BALLISTIC CATHARSIS: perforating uncooperative objects with chunks of lead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly
popdonnelly said; "To be honest, I don't see any reason assault weapons should be sold to the public."

You don't expect the manufacturers to just give them away, do you? How else is the public supposed to get them?

Or are you buying into the counter-revolutionary nonsense of the liberals? The men at Lexington and Concord who risked or sacrificed their lives to protect your freedoms did so in order to deny the government the power to confiscate the arms of the citizenry. Why do you wish to make their sacrifices worthless?

98 posted on 02/01/2006 1:41:12 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson