Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: abortion law unconstitutional
MSNBC.com ^ | 1/31/2006 | AP

Posted on 01/31/2006 12:54:25 PM PST by Jhohanna

SAN FRANCISCO - An appeals court ruled Tuesday that the federal law banning 'partial-birth' abortion is unconstitutional, saying the measure is vague and lacks an exception for cases in which a woman’s health is at stake.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; 9thcourt; abortion; murder; partialbirth; pbaban; prolife; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last
I *hate* the 9th Court. Of course they would rule this unconstitutional. But how can it be?
1 posted on 01/31/2006 12:54:27 PM PST by Jhohanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

This is the 9th Circus. They'd say that the declaration of independence was unconstitutional if a Republican said that it wasn't.


2 posted on 01/31/2006 12:55:27 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna
Bring it on, 9th Circus. There's at least two new sheriffs in DC.
3 posted on 01/31/2006 12:56:14 PM PST by 50sDad (Racist: Anyone who is winning an argument with a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

Sounds to me like a nice test case for for our new Supreme Court. Just in time.


4 posted on 01/31/2006 12:56:23 PM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

Excellent. We will now get to see what the new Supreme court is made of.


5 posted on 01/31/2006 12:56:27 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

On it is - to the Supreme Court!


6 posted on 01/31/2006 12:56:28 PM PST by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

You know where this is going?

PAGING JUSTICE ALITO!!!


7 posted on 01/31/2006 12:56:41 PM PST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

The most overturned court ever.


8 posted on 01/31/2006 12:56:55 PM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

I'm looking forward to some major smackdowns on the 9th Circus from the reinvigorated, newly conservative SCOTUS.


9 posted on 01/31/2006 12:57:29 PM PST by mkjessup (Thank YOU Jimmy F'in Carter, you chicklet-grinning SOB, for stabbing the Shah of Iran in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

Hopefully the 9th circuit will retain the title of being the most overturned court in the federal system. We will know where Alito stands sooner rather than later.


10 posted on 01/31/2006 12:57:58 PM PST by Timedrifter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna
How's this for an argument: being forced to feed your children for 18 years amounts to forced labor, which is of course slavery. Therefore, any law preventing a parent from killing his underage chlldren is unconstitutional, and also violates the emancipation proclamation.

Let's run that baby through the 9th circuit, and see what they come up with.

11 posted on 01/31/2006 12:58:12 PM PST by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAY

Before you all grab your flaming torches like the villagers in "Frankenstein" remember this has also been blocked by courts as diverse as New York and Nebraska; it's not just this one court. The Supremes don't tend to take cases that several lower courts have agreed with each other about.


12 posted on 01/31/2006 12:58:32 PM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna
The 9th Circus continues to dig themselves deeper into the pit of judicial contempt which will define them in the history books.
13 posted on 01/31/2006 12:59:59 PM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
I'm looking forward to some major smackdowns on the 9th Circus from the reinvigorated, newly conservative SCOTUS.

I don't think it'll happen in the abortion issues yet. Given previous votes, I think the court still tilts 5-4 pro-abortion even after Alito and Roberts.

14 posted on 01/31/2006 1:00:47 PM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna
It is IMPOSSIBLE that a woman's health can be improved by a partial birth abortion -IMPOSSIBLE!!

The procedure is to induce labor, stop the labor with some part of the child still inside the woman and then KILL THE BABY. This actually TAKES MORE TIME than simply inducing labor and delivering the baby.

If they were really concerned about the mother's "Health" why take up precious time to kill the precious baby?

Why not skip the step that kills the baby?
15 posted on 01/31/2006 1:01:29 PM PST by msnimje (SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

The question is if we can get another justice in before this makes it to the SCOTUS. That would GREAT.


16 posted on 01/31/2006 1:01:48 PM PST by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna
Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Roberts, Alito.

Yup, that's 5.

9th overturned again.

17 posted on 01/31/2006 1:03:03 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

Yep, this is the 9th Circuit. This district needs broken up really bad.


18 posted on 01/31/2006 1:03:25 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna
...lacks an exception for cases in which a woman’s health is at stake.

WTF? What possible kind of health issues could there be in a case where the child has been 95% delivered with maybe it's foot left in the birth canal, and then someone comes along and sucks it's brains out? Sounds to me like the only health issues at stake in PBA are those of the child.

It just reinforces my opinion that the legal system in this country (or maybe it's just this particular court, but there have been other cases elsewhere that make me wonder) is being run by a bunch of clueless idiots who can't think through a problem, but only worship legal process and stare decisis (and abortion) as their God. My God, for a gruesome practice like PBA, where the child has been delivered for all practical purposes, there can't be any health benefits to the mother that would be gained from slaughtering the child.

19 posted on 01/31/2006 1:04:58 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Kennedy?

I'm not so sure.
Kennedy's pretty wobbly.

4-4, with 1 swing vote, is now where things stand.


20 posted on 01/31/2006 1:04:58 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson