To: Jhohanna
It is IMPOSSIBLE that a woman's health can be improved by a partial birth abortion -IMPOSSIBLE!!
The procedure is to induce labor, stop the labor with some part of the child still inside the woman and then KILL THE BABY. This actually TAKES MORE TIME than simply inducing labor and delivering the baby.
If they were really concerned about the mother's "Health" why take up precious time to kill the precious baby?
Why not skip the step that kills the baby?
15 posted on
01/31/2006 1:01:29 PM PST by
msnimje
(SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
To: msnimje
See, this is the exact news that I think needs to get out there, is that it only can serve HARM. *sigh* *hug* I just want to go cry now.
Jeez. You would think with as many childless women like me out there that WANT children, NEED them in their lives... we might get a chance to talk to one stupid girl and save a baby's life. But do you think they are trying to put in a plan for that??? But no, they deliever a child that cannot live on its own and justify killing a living human. What on EARTH is this world coming to?
28 posted on
01/31/2006 1:08:31 PM PST by
Jhohanna
(Born Free)
To: msnimje
29 posted on
01/31/2006 1:08:49 PM PST by
agrace
(Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me if you know so much. Job 38:4)
To: msnimje
" The procedure is to induce labor, stop the labor with some part of the child still inside the woman and then KILL THE BABY. This actually TAKES MORE TIME than simply inducing labor and delivering the baby."
As I understand it, you skipped one important step, first the baby is turned around breach so it can be delivered feet first, stopping just short of delivering the head so it's skull can be punctured and it's brain sucked out.
So why is it that during a normal birth, it's supposed to be bad for the mothers health if the baby is breach???
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson