Lefty rag whining about voter fraud clampdown (which is long overdue). I haven't heard anything about this Ohio initiative.
1 posted on
01/31/2006 12:24:19 PM PST by
Uncledave
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Uncledave
Great 'unbiased' copy -- I'm guessing this is NOT from Fox News . . .
;^)
2 posted on
01/31/2006 12:26:58 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Uncledave
. . . discriminatory voter ID . . . Yeah, it discriminates against illegal aliens. How RUDE!
To: Uncledave
One thing that could cause a problem is the way Ohio law requires that a driver's license (many people's only form of legal ID) be taken at the time of a DUI
arrest (in other words before any conviction). The alternate "State ID" requires that one re-take the driving test before getting their license back.
-Eric
4 posted on
01/31/2006 12:27:57 PM PST by
E Rocc
To: Uncledave
Boy, these guys are just not having a good day...
5 posted on
01/31/2006 12:30:33 PM PST by
Kenton
To: Uncledave
"It will also virtually eliminate the homeless, elderly and impoverished from the voting rolls..."
because, you know, none of them ever have "a photo ID, a utility bill, a bank statement, a government check or other government document." Uh huh.
The real reason the libs are scared is that this will crimp the dead and illegal votes, core Democrap voting blocks.
6 posted on
01/31/2006 12:30:49 PM PST by
piytar
To: Uncledave
Section 35-05.18 of HB3 requires restrictive identification requirements for anyone trying to vote in an Ohio election. Photo ID, a utility bill, a bank statement, a government check or other government document showing the name and current address of the voter will be required. This is the identical requirement used by UPS to pick up a package. Seems reasonable to me.
9 posted on
01/31/2006 12:35:12 PM PST by
bfree
(PC is BS)
To: Uncledave
It will also virtually eliminate the homeless, elderly and impoverished from the voting rolls.Yeah, everybody knows that "those people" don't carry ID. Oh, wait a minute; don't they have to show something to cash their relief checks? < /sarcasm >
10 posted on
01/31/2006 12:35:59 PM PST by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
To: Uncledave
bout damn time, everyone knows that the left truly hates accountability in Ohio.
11 posted on
01/31/2006 12:37:08 PM PST by
mr_hammer
(They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
To: Uncledave
Would they like a litte cheese with that whine?
Dead people and illegal aliens can't vote? I'm Shocked!!!
12 posted on
01/31/2006 12:37:37 PM PST by
Leofl
(I'm from Texas, we don't dial 9-11)
To: Uncledave
Fitrakis is a raving nutjob. He wants the heads of the Rat Senators who voted for cloture.
13 posted on
01/31/2006 12:37:52 PM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: Uncledave
"Restrictive"
Looks like it restricts people to voting only once per election, in their proper district, and only while still alive.
It's tyranny, I tell you!
14 posted on
01/31/2006 12:41:24 PM PST by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Uncledave
Dems. This is really gonna make it hard for us to cheat.
We won't be able to have someone vote for the dead.
We won't be able to bus people from precinct to precinct voting multiple times.
We won't be able to bus in people from out of state to vote.
It's really gonna suck to be us.
15 posted on
01/31/2006 12:42:03 PM PST by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty.)
To: Uncledave
Don't know how much of this story is true, but a driver's license or state issued ID should be enough. Requireing a bank statement and utility bill does seem ridiculous. What if your apartment fee includes utilities, or you simply don't have a bank account?
16 posted on
01/31/2006 12:43:07 PM PST by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
To: Uncledave
My summary: "We should be allowed to cheat as much as we want!"
17 posted on
01/31/2006 12:43:56 PM PST by
mjwise
To: Uncledave
The bill is designed to help end free elections and continue the process of installing the GOP as America's permanent ruling party. Because without the continued ease of voter fraud, 500 people registering as living at a vacant lot, and people voting 5 to 10 times each at every precinct, there is no way the democrats can win.
19 posted on
01/31/2006 12:45:05 PM PST by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: Uncledave
Despite grassroots protests and bitter opposition from Common Cause, the League of Women Voters and other pro-democracy liberal activist groups. There that's much closer to the truth
23 posted on
01/31/2006 12:51:20 PM PST by
Ouderkirk
(Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
To: Uncledave
If Democrats aren't allowed to cheat, they think election are not fair.
To: Uncledave
If Democrats aren't allowed to cheat, they think election are not fair.
To: Uncledave
Excellent news. I'd prefer a photo ID requirement, but it's a start.
26 posted on
01/31/2006 12:53:02 PM PST by
Peach
To: Uncledave
"It's meant to allow Republican "challengers" to intimidate anyone who turns up to vote in heavily Democratic precincts." Translation: This will intimidate anyone who shows up with false identity and attempts to cast an illegal vote, because it will now be a felony to do so.
27 posted on
01/31/2006 12:53:41 PM PST by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson