Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lefty rag whining about voter fraud clampdown (which is long overdue). I haven't heard anything about this Ohio initiative.
1 posted on 01/31/2006 12:24:19 PM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Uncledave
Great 'unbiased' copy -- I'm guessing this is NOT from Fox News . . .
;^)

2 posted on 01/31/2006 12:26:58 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
. . . discriminatory voter ID . . .

Yeah, it discriminates against illegal aliens. How RUDE!

3 posted on 01/31/2006 12:27:55 PM PST by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
One thing that could cause a problem is the way Ohio law requires that a driver's license (many people's only form of legal ID) be taken at the time of a DUI arrest (in other words before any conviction). The alternate "State ID" requires that one re-take the driving test before getting their license back.

-Eric

4 posted on 01/31/2006 12:27:57 PM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Boy, these guys are just not having a good day...


5 posted on 01/31/2006 12:30:33 PM PST by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

"It will also virtually eliminate the homeless, elderly and impoverished from the voting rolls..."

because, you know, none of them ever have "a photo ID, a utility bill, a bank statement, a government check or other government document." Uh huh.

The real reason the libs are scared is that this will crimp the dead and illegal votes, core Democrap voting blocks.


6 posted on 01/31/2006 12:30:49 PM PST by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
Section 35-05.18 of HB3 requires restrictive identification requirements for anyone trying to vote in an Ohio election. Photo ID, a utility bill, a bank statement, a government check or other government document showing the name and current address of the voter will be required.

This is the identical requirement used by UPS to pick up a package. Seems reasonable to me.

9 posted on 01/31/2006 12:35:12 PM PST by bfree (PC is BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
It will also virtually eliminate the homeless, elderly and impoverished from the voting rolls.

Yeah, everybody knows that "those people" don't carry ID. Oh, wait a minute; don't they have to show something to cash their relief checks? < /sarcasm >

10 posted on 01/31/2006 12:35:59 PM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
bout damn time, everyone knows that the left truly hates accountability in Ohio.
11 posted on 01/31/2006 12:37:08 PM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Would they like a litte cheese with that whine?

Dead people and illegal aliens can't vote? I'm Shocked!!!


12 posted on 01/31/2006 12:37:37 PM PST by Leofl (I'm from Texas, we don't dial 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Fitrakis is a raving nutjob. He wants the heads of the Rat Senators who voted for cloture.


13 posted on 01/31/2006 12:37:52 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
"Restrictive"

Looks like it restricts people to voting only once per election, in their proper district, and only while still alive.

It's tyranny, I tell you!

14 posted on 01/31/2006 12:41:24 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
Dems. This is really gonna make it hard for us to cheat.

We won't be able to have someone vote for the dead.

We won't be able to bus people from precinct to precinct voting multiple times.

We won't be able to bus in people from out of state to vote.

It's really gonna suck to be us.
15 posted on 01/31/2006 12:42:03 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Don't know how much of this story is true, but a driver's license or state issued ID should be enough. Requireing a bank statement and utility bill does seem ridiculous. What if your apartment fee includes utilities, or you simply don't have a bank account?


16 posted on 01/31/2006 12:43:07 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

My summary: "We should be allowed to cheat as much as we want!"


17 posted on 01/31/2006 12:43:56 PM PST by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
The bill is designed to help end free elections and continue the process of installing the GOP as America's permanent ruling party. Because without the continued ease of voter fraud, 500 people registering as living at a vacant lot, and people voting 5 to 10 times each at every precinct, there is no way the democrats can win.
19 posted on 01/31/2006 12:45:05 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
Despite grassroots protests and bitter opposition from Common Cause, the League of Women Voters and other pro-democracy liberal activist groups. There that's much closer to the truth
23 posted on 01/31/2006 12:51:20 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

If Democrats aren't allowed to cheat, they think election are not fair.


24 posted on 01/31/2006 12:52:09 PM PST by Pittsburg Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

If Democrats aren't allowed to cheat, they think election are not fair.


25 posted on 01/31/2006 12:52:21 PM PST by Pittsburg Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Excellent news. I'd prefer a photo ID requirement, but it's a start.


26 posted on 01/31/2006 12:53:02 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
"It's meant to allow Republican "challengers" to intimidate anyone who turns up to vote in heavily Democratic precincts."

Translation: This will intimidate anyone who shows up with false identity and attempts to cast an illegal vote, because it will now be a felony to do so.

27 posted on 01/31/2006 12:53:41 PM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson