Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill
[All I did was post the actual quotes which longshadow had alluded to. Period. I didn't even provide any comment of my own.]

Your response was to #658.

Yes, just as I already mentioned.

Please re-read #2 as you say for comprehension.

I did.

And you want us to believe post #719 has nothing to do with #658.

Get a grip -- I didn't say it had "nothing to do with #658" -- I already mentioned that it was a reply to that post, of *course* it had "something to do" with it. Sheesh.

That doesn't, however, justify the strange and bizarre things you managed to read into the mere fact that I replied by posting the quote he was describing especially since I did so without comment. I was providing historical context, not arguing a case for or against linking versus pasting, nor "attacking" the author of the quotes, nor anything else you've managed to fantasize about my post.

Whatever your emotional issues are which cause you to be able to "read" all sorts of things into the simple posting of a quote that had been mentioned, please work them out before you reply again.

I was born at night, but not last night....

That's not how it appears.

[We didn't get Gore3000 banned, with or without a conspiracy.]

Now who's hallucinating?

You are, as I've already documented.

Please post where I said you were part of the conspiracy. In other words as you say so often...

"We" being Freepers. As I already documented, and you've failed to acknowledge, Gore3000 was banned not as the result of any "conspiracy", but because he self-destructed in a very public and foolhardy way.

923 posted on 02/02/2006 5:41:06 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon; longshadow; andysandmikesmom; Stultis; whattajoke; js1138
Criminitly... I don't know if I can address all the contradictions in one post, but I'll give it a shot.

First I'm told I shouldn't read anything into a post from I'mon that isn't there, then Stultis tells me When Ichneumon said "we" I think it's obvious he meant freevolutionists, whether specifically including himself or not.

I specifically didn't name names or say who was involved in a conspiracy. I only said he was conspired against. I based that statement on this post by js1138. Are you guys calling him a liar?

"We" being Freepers. As I already documented, and you've failed to acknowledge,

You mean in this post?

As for your assertion that Gore3000 was "conspired against and banned", you are again hallucinating. We didn't get Gore3000 banned, with or without a conspiracy. He was banned for being insane enough to personally attack Jim Robinson, repeatedly. My favorite bit of craziness was when Gore3000 accused JimRob of having an "anti-Christian agenda", among other things, and chided him for "not being God". Read this and the thread it links to get a clue. We didn't "conspire against" Gore3000, he self-destructed when his stupidity and emotional problems peaked at the same time.

Am I supposed to "acknowledge" the second "we" or the first "we" as freepers? Was I supposed to infer we = freepers from some other post you made to me or did you hide it in one of your soliloquies to someone else that I was supposed to acknowledge?

Whatever your emotional issues are which cause you to be able to "read" all sorts of things into the simple posting of a quote that had been mentioned, please work them out before you reply again.

Can I post again now sir? I think I have a grip on my emotions now but I'm still a bit dizzy from all the circular logic the backtracking going on here.
961 posted on 02/02/2006 10:03:23 PM PST by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson