Replies

To: PatrickHenry

For those who may be suspicious, the official position of Darwin Central is that we were not involved.

Isn't this odd how this has evolved?

We have some set of events that occurred, most of which are not in dispute, yet the origin/genesis of the process appears unknown but not unknowable.

And check out how the debate has progressed from a statement of the facts, to redefining words, to name calling, to straw men and ultimately psychoanalysis via freep forum to discredit. Just so one side can claim victory. And still the known facts are not in dispute. The parallels are uncanny.

1,015 posted on 02/03/2006 11:16:06 AM PST by darbymcgill

Tinfoil hat ravings placemarker

1,017 posted on 02/03/2006 11:24:56 AM PST by Thatcherite (More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)

We have some set of events that occurred, most of which are not in dispute, yet the origin/genesis of the process appears unknown but not unknowable.

Why don't you just pursue your quest with those who were in a position to know the answers?

Or are you incapable of figuring out who they might be?

1,022 posted on 02/03/2006 12:01:43 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794